Saturday, September 29, 2012

Obama's Plan To Seize Control Of Our Economy And Our Lives


Wow, this is really scary.  The main stream media (the propoganda arm of the democrat party) completely ignored this.  Imagine if George W Bush had signed THIS executive order, there would have been chaos in the streets as the Democrats would have (correctly) protested this naked grab of power.

Please read this article: com/sites/jimpowell/2012/04/29/obamas-plan-to-seize-control-of-our-economy-and-our-lives/2/    

Tyranny is at hand.  Government exists to serve the people, it must remain small and do everything it can to not interfere, interject or impose itself on individuals.  Government is FORCE, it must be kept in check, it must be humbled, it must be subservient to the individual. 

If we continue to remain silent as Goverment grows beyond its intended role, we will no longer have individual rights, no freedom of choice, no liberty, no pursuit of happiness, and if the Government so deems, no life.

Government is the Leviathan, the wriggling serpent. We must "break the heads of Leviathan in pieces".

Do whatever you can to vote the Leviathan out of the Whitehouse.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Women with Weapons


New Sketch for Saturday Night Live Revealed!


SNL, (Saturday Night Live) will be airing a new sketch on November 3rd centered around a school lunchroom. SNL will be introducing a new cast member in this Glee like production done to the tune of Hips don't lie. The new cast member will be playing Michelle Obama in the sketch. In an interview, Lorne Michaels stated, "We didn't have to worry much about those haunches because we can just add padding for that, the hard part was finding someone who could make her weird mouth expressionisms" (sic). The new skit will feature New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg himself getting caught sneaking out of a janitors closet drinking a 64 oz. Big Gulp and then launching into a rendition of the Soda


Song: Coca-Cola came to town. Diet Pepsi shot him down. Doctor Pepper picked him up. Now they all drink Seven-Up. Michelle Obama then chases Michael Bloomberg while bludgeoning him with a large clump of celery stalks. The backdrop to all of this is the students singing about how they are starving with the new Michelle Obama lunch menus. As the students slowly succumb to starvation, they fall on the floor and pass out as Michelle chases Michael offstage. The scene then cuts to an interview with Debbie Wasserman Schultz where she categorically denies that Michael Bloomberg was actually holding a big gulp soda as the video of it plays behind her. The interviewer gives up in total frustration and walks off stage as Michael, Michelle and Debbie all high five each other. The confidential source for this article was Senator Harry Reid.



Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Women with Weapons


How teachers unions reward bad teachers and punish good teachers.



 Only one out of every 1000 teachers are fired for performance related reasons compared to one out of 97 lawyers and one out of every 57 doctors. This is because of anti-learning, anti-student contracts made by teachers unions. This criminal gang doesn't care if a teacher cannot teach or even is the teacher is a child molester as long as the teacher is on the unions side and is available to extort union dues from in order to pay off their political cronies thus funding and perpetuating the criminal activity.

In Sacramento, the teacher of the year, Michelle Apperson had to be laid off of due to Union tenure and seniority rules. Imagine if a private company laid off their best salesperson? The company would deserve to go out of business and so do teachers unions. In New York City, over 700 teachers were being paid to do nothing. Many of these teachers are sexual molesters, pedophiles, malcontents and miscreants; however, they cannot be fired due to union contracts, so your taxes continue to pay for them to do nothing which is actually an improvement over having these loyal union members in the classroom. 66 year old millionaire Pedophile Alan Rosenfeld sits in a New York City "rubber room" today collecting a six figure salary plus benefits because the school system cannot fire him, union rules stipulate that there is no mandatory retirement age and the school system cannot allow this pedophile into the classroom to molest and harass young girls. Why do teachers unions protect and reward pedophile teachers? Loyalty to the cause: perpetuating the corrupt unions.

What is happening in our schools today is a NATIONAL EMERGENCY! Involuntary teachers unions dues go to pay off politicians that then vote for pro-union, anti-student legislation. We need to begin to diminish the power of these anti-learning unions by recognizing that federal and state government unions are unnecessary and counter-productive to good government and good schools.

The excellent, motivated teachers receive nothing from their hard work and dedication. Shouldn't we compensate and reward those teachers that inspire and motivate our children? We WANT these teachers to stay in the system and create a legacy of students that are inspired and stimulated. These teachers have the potential to fundamentally change the lives of students in the most fundamental and meaningful ways yet the current system only punishes them and treats them the same or worse than moribund clock watchers.

What can you do? Become informed and vote for politicians that are not paid off by the teachers unions.

Here are three great documentaries to watch:
 
The Lottery                The Cartel                 Waiting for Superman

No Idolatry here.

Depictions of Muhammad


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The permissibility of depictions of Muhammad, the founder of Islam, has long been a concern in the history of Islam. Oral and written descriptions are readily accepted by all traditions of Islam, but there is disagreement about visual depictions.[1][2] The Quran does not explicitly forbid images of Muhammad, but there are a few hadith (supplemental teachings) which have explicitly prohibited Muslims from creating visual depictions of figures.
 Most Sunni Muslims believe that visual depictions of all the prophets of Islam should be prohibited[3] and are particularly averse to visual representations of Muhammad.[4] The key concern is that the use of images can encourage idolatry.[5] In Shia Islam, however, images of Muhammad are quite common nowadays, even though Shia scholars historically were against such depictions.[4][6] Still, many Muslims who take a stricter view of the supplemental traditions will sometimes challenge any depiction of Muhammad, including those created and published by non-Muslims.[7]
The question of whether images in Islamic art, including those depicting the Prophet, can be considered as religious art remains a matter of contention among scholars.[8] They appear in illustrated books that are normally works of history or poetry, including those with religious subjects; the Qu'ran is never illustrated: "context and intent are essential to understanding Islamic pictorial art. The Muslim artists creating images of Muhammad, and the public who beheld them, understood that the images were not objects of worship. Nor were the objects so decorated used as part of religious worship".[9] However, scholars concede that such images have "a spiritual element", and were also sometimes used in informal religious devotions celebrating the day of the Mi'raj.[10] Many visual depictions only show Muhammad with his face veiled, or symbolically represent him as a flame; other images, notably from before about 1500, show his face.[11][12][13] However, depictions of Muhammad were rare, never numerous in any community or era throughout Islamic history,[14][15] appearing almost entirely in the private medium of Persian and other miniature book illustration.[16][17] The key medium of public religious art in Islam was and is calligraphy.[15][16]
File:Maome.jpg
 
 
 
Muhammad delivering The Farewell Sermon, 17th century Ottoman copy of an early 14th century Persian image.[46]

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

CBS News deliberately lies in its headline about Romney's comment on Teachers Unions Contributions.

On cbsnews.com in an article written by Matthew Shelley, the headline read "Romney: Limit teacher contributions to politicians" when in the Interview with NBC's Brian Williams, Romney is clearly talking about teacher's unions. Romney Stated: "I think we have to get the money out of the teachers unions going into campaigns." The headline clearly falsely and intentionally mischaracterizes Romney's comments to fuel media supported false stereotypes and to provide a narrative for unsophisticated readers with no intellectual curiosity to read beyond a headline.

Furthermore, as I parsed through Mr. Shelleys articles, it was stunning to see how the Media propogandists use selected unflattering photos of Republicans in general and Romney in particular to create a narrative that matches their own negative stereotypes of non-leftists.

Dishonesty in the mainstream media. No one should be surprised by this, but we should always be disappointed.


The article is here: http://www.cbsnews.com/8300-503544_162-503544.html?contributor=10471225&tag=contentMain;contentBody
Pictured Above: Useful Idiot Matthew Shelley

Girls with Guns

Never Forget.

Bacon shortage coming?


Say it isn't so!
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57519703/global-bacon-shortage-unavoidable-group-says/





Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Why Freedom of Speech in the USA will be determined by the status of a French Cartoon.

First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. Their decision to publish the Islamic Prophet Mohammed was a profile in courage, an act of bravery and integrity.

So, why is it so important that it was published and should be allowed to be published in the USA and the world? In the US, we have freedom of speech, even if that speech offends or is even considered hate speech. While we cannot yell "fire!" in a movie theater, anything short of this is legal and free. If an intolerant group are allowed to determine what we say by simply becoming violent then we have no free speech. The intolerent group can then effectively legislate what we are allowed to say, for instance: If I said, "I think that the practice of forced female circumcism is a violation of human rights" and a particular group stormed a US embassy in say, an Islamic country, because they believed that this showed hatred towards their religion and expressing that belief then became illegal, groups everywhere would learn that all they had to do to suppress free speech would be to become violent.

One of the founders of our great nation, George Washington once said: "If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." And here is my quote: "When you allow others to determine the definition of evil; hear no evil, speak no evil, have no freedom of speech".

Elements of the islamic world are calling for the banning of this cartoon and the unfinished poorly done video "The innocence of Muslims", however we may or may not dislike them, we must protect them as if our lives depended upon it.

I call on free newspapers throughout the world to print images of the so called "Prophet" every day until we have 1 day without Muslim violence.