Well. If you’ve been paying attention, you know the reason for this is that the DOJ and the FBI insisted members of Congress be allowed to review and take notes about the documents (after months of resisting even that), but not be allowed to keep copies. You can’t provide the evidence if you’ve been trying to get the evidence and you’ve been denied access to it.
But you want Nunes to provide evidence? He’s trying to get it, and now he’s going directly after what was said in FISA court hearings on the Carter Page wiretap warrant hearings:
Writing to Rosemary M. Collyer, the presiding judge at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Nunes asked for transcripts of “any relevant FISC hearings associated with the initial FISA application or subsequent renewals related to electronic surveillance of Carter Page.”
The Page surveillance warrant, first granted in October 2016, and the evidence used to secure it are at the heart of the controversial memo Nunes and the White House released last week on alleged surveillance abuse.
The Republican staff-authored memo claimed that the unverified anti-Trump dossier was critical for the surveillance warrant application, and that the government omitted key information about its political funding. Lawmakers have clashed over that document for weeks, and a Democrat-authored rebuttal memo could be released as early as Friday.
Transcripts from the application hearings could speak to a central issue in the debate: to what extent the FBI and DOJ relied on the dossier.
This information will be essential in telling us how much the FBI really relied on the Steele dossier to get this warrant, and also whether the FISA court really did its job in scrutinizing everything the FBI presented as evidence of probable cause. No one can say for sure how complete these...Read More HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Test Word Verification