Might upset other pedophiles.
Australian reporters working for ABC Tasmania were angered when they were advised by top brass to stop using the word “pedophile” to refer to an accused serial child molester because it could discourage other pedophiles from seeking help.
“Oh, won’t someone think of the poor pedophiles!”
A senior producer at the network informed employees that Sexual Assault Support Service (SASS) had “mentioned their concerns” about describing former nurse James Geoffrey Griffin as a pedophile.
Griffin, who subsequently committed suicide, was accused by numerous women of sexually abusing them as children and police later found “a significant amount of child exploitation material” during a search of his home.
“We should avoid [the term pedophile], unless we know he had a clinical diagnosis of paedophilia and instead use serial sexual offender / predator, or a sexual abuser of children and young people,” the producer wrote in an email.
The missive also cited the SASS in advising that there are many “people with paedophilia” who “do not act on those impulses,” if they “reach out for and receive professional psychological help.”
The producer claimed that labeling Griffin a pedophile “could discourage” non-offending pedophiles “from seeking help, making it more likely that they go on to abuse children.”
Reporters were apparently “concerned and angered” by the email and were later told by the network that the word “pedophile” hadn’t been banned but that the SASS’s advice should be considered.
Some respondents saw this as yet another example of how society is becoming increasingly tolerant of pedophilia, which some on the far-left have tried to re-define as an alternative sexual orientation.
“Yes, by all means, let’s not hurt pedophiles feelings,” remarked one.
“This is what happens to empires/societies that live too soft too long and don’t face enough adversity or threats to its existence,” added another. “They go weird and can’t even call a spade a spade.”
Last summer, a controversy erupted when Netflix released Cuties, a movie that depicts underage children in a sexually exploitative manner.
However, many on the left defended the movie, claiming it highlighted the problem of sexually exploiting children.
Which would be like actually torturing animals to highlight the problem of...
Read More HERE
Australian media is mindless. Several years ago a reporter interviewed a gay married couple who had adopted a young child from Russia. Oh she gushed on and on about their lovely family unity as the child happily played with the animals around him. It looked so LUVERLY. She presented them as such a wholesome fam and the entire gay parenting lifestyle.
ReplyDeleteTHEN reality struck.
The child was found to be heavily trafficked from the start, it was a pedophile set up. In fact both men have been imprisoned, one in America. This event was used to start the gay situation and Putin a few years back because it was then he put a stop to foreign adoption of Russian children.
The reporter who gushed was, of course, embarrassed but never apologized for presenting what she saw was the truth.
Also, having known many in the justice system of Australia, I know from many that pedophilia and child sacrifice in Australia is rampant and protected. It is, in these regards, a satanic nation. The UK shipped hundreds of thousands of child slaves to Australia (as well as Canada and Rhodesia). I knew many of those Australians as adults. Their lot was horrific even as adults due to trauma. This went on until 1964 this shipping of STOLEN children to Australian institutions. They had no identity legally until the whole mess was uncovered but few ever found their original families.
Almost all I knew suffered horrific child abuse that left me a tad stunned ... I was still pretty naive regarding the underbelly of the beast back then. Not so much any more.