During an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday, Harris was asked why her and Biden aren’t doing more to abolish the Second Amendment.
“We actually, as an administration, have taken action. The president issued executive orders, for example, on ghost guns, and there is only so much, however, that a president can do through executive action,” Harris told host Dana Bash.
“This president, Joe Biden, has a long-standing history of speaking very clearly and unambiguously about the need for smart gun safety laws, back from the time that he was in the Senate through today. But I guess that emphasizes the point that both he when he was in the Senate when I was in the Senate, same thing, we were pushing for legislation. Congress has to act. Because we have to codify, that’s a fancy word for make permanent, make the law, that we agree.”
Infowars.com reports: Harris then evoked the Sandy Hook shooting as justification for banning “assault weapons.”
“We should have background checks. That’s just reasonable gun safety laws. We should have an assault weapons ban. Assault weapons have been designed to kill a lot of people quickly. They are weapons of war, and Congress has to account, Dana,” Harris said.
“I mean, you know, I was recently in Connecticut. Senators Murphy and Blumenthal and the governor there, so many people, the families of Sandy Hook. You know, I honestly thought that when those babies, 26 seven-year-old children, were slaughtered, I thought Congress would act. I thought that would be the thing, and it didn’t happen.”
Bash asked, “But do you think it can happen?”
Harris said, “It has to happen.”
Gun owners across the country have...
Read More HERE
Go ahead.
ReplyDeleteMake my day.
I have wondered won't ANYONE (like me) challenge a politician with this phrase = "you say these are weapons of war and they are so that means the people of this country can wage war against a tyrant government. Like our own American Government. Right? Or do you want the American population defenseless against your own attack?" That is exactly what my "weapons of war" are for. To wage war against any who wage war against me.
ReplyDeleteWhy is that whore always cackling? She can't utter that gibberish & keep a straight face?
ReplyDeleteAnyone know where we can find a lawyer willing to challenge each of the EOs in a friendly court, and get them tossed on the basis of they violate enumerated rights, and also sue the president under 18 USC SS252 - Deprivation of Rights under color of law?
ReplyDeleteSo codify means to make permanent? When I move to another state, will I codify my new address? So scary to think the dumbest people in the world are in charge! Hey Cameltow, codify means to put into law, as in US Criminal Code xx.x, for example.
ReplyDelete