So why are journalists not covering it?
Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid”. The 15-page article chronicles the gargantuan struggle being waged by frontline doctors on all continents to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them.
Because of ivermectin, Capuzzo says, there are “hundreds of thousands, actually millions, of people around the world, from Uttar Pradesh in India to Peru to Brazil, who are living and not dying.” Yet media outlets have done all they can to “debunk” the notion that ivermectin may serve as an effective, easily accessible and affordable treatment for Covid-19. They have parroted the arguments laid out by health regulators around the world that there just isn’t enough evidence to justify its use.
For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with [his] own eyes the other side [of the story]” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets.
“I really wish the world could see both sides,” Capuzzo laments. But unfortunately most reporters are not interested in telling the other side of the story. Even if they were, their publishers would probably refuse to publish it.
That may explain why Capuzzo, a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist best known for his New York Times-bestselling nonfiction books Close to Shore and Murder Room, ended up publishing his article on ivermectin in Mountain Home, a monthly local magazine for the of the Pennsylvania mountains and New York Finger Lakes region, of which Capuzzo’s wife is the editor. It’s also the reason why I decided to dedicate today’s post to Capuzzo’s article. Put simply, as many people as possible –particularly journalists — need to read his story.
As Capuzzo himself says, “I don’t know of a bigger story in the world.”
Total News Blackout
On December 8 2020, FLCCC member Dr Pierre Kory gave nine minutes of impassioned testimony to the US Homeland Security Committee Meeting on the potent anti-viral, anti-inflammatory benefits of ivermectin. A total of 9 million people (myself included) saw the video on YouTube before it was taken down by YouTube’s owner, Google. As Capuzzo exhaustively lays out, both traditional and social media have gone to extraordinary lengths to keep people in the dark about ivermectin. So effective has this been that even in some of the countries that have benefited most from its use (such as Mexico and Argentina) many people are completely unaware of its existence. And this is no surprise given how little information is actually seeping out into the public arena.
A news blackout by the world’s leading media came down on Ivermectin like an iron curtain. Reporters who trumpeted the COVID-19 terror in India and Brazil didn’t report that Ivermectin was crushing the P-1 variant in the Brazilian rain forest and killing COVID-19 and all variants in India. That Ivermectin was saving tens of thousands of lives in South America wasn’t news, but mocking the continent’s peasants for taking horse paste was. Journalists denied the world knowledge of the most effective life-saving therapies in the pandemic, Kory said, especially among the elderly, people of color, and the poor, while wringing their hands at the tragedy of their disparate rates of...
Read More HERE
Not unwise to carry some yourself. Sure beats the jab for actually, functionally, working.
ReplyDeleteThey use it for horses. Not saying you should supply that way. And I don't recommend you looking up the weight dose usage.
Actually. I do. Not sure if I would mix it and the jab... or two... or is it up to three now? Not sure, either, if you have already had it... as I have. If I could get going, I would buy some. Cheap. Easy to obtain at any farm and implement type store. But... it's on you. Some things have consequences. Actually, all things do. Good luck.
the government:
ReplyDeletehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
also the government:
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
the government doesn't have your interests in mind
Thanks for posting this. I've been following the FLCCC gang online for over a year now. Billionaire Steve Kirsch is also making a heroic and expensive effort to fund studies, web sites, and to try to win over media and government. Visit his website. Ivermectin is the thing, but Ivermectin along with Fluvoxamine is an even bigger and better thing.
ReplyDeleteIf I were to use livestock IVM, I'd use the liquid version made by Durvet. While it is injectable, it is usually given orally. 1cc of the stuff has 10mg of IVM, and a standard human dose of the prescription only pills is 0.3mg/kg. Which means if you weigh 220lbs, which is 100kg, the dose would be 30mg, which is 5 of the 6mg pills, or 3cc of the liquid, taken orally. Don't forget that it's absorbed much better with a high fat meal. Durvet's page has all kinds of warnings saying how if humans take this they will explode, catch on fire, grow an extra eyeball out their butt, and die in more pain than when Joffrey was poisoned on Game of Thrones, so don't ever ever do such a stupid thing. Durvet also makes several of the horse pastes too. Never ever consider using one of those either, especially the kind that have other kinds of wormer medicine. Seriously, all snark aside, avoid the stuff with other medicines in it.