90 Miles From Tyranny : 2023-07-30

Visage à trois #1601

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:





Three Additional Bonus Videos:

Visage à trois #1600

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:




Three Additional Bonus Videos:

BOMBSHELL: Spokesperson Admits During Tyrannical Australian Senate Hearing That Pfizer Employees Were Given Special Batch Of Vaccine, Different From What Was Distributed To Public (VIDEO)


In a shocking revelation during a Senate hearing in Tyrannical Australia, a Pfizer spokesperson revealed that the pharmaceutical giant had imported a special batch of COVID-19 vaccines solely for their employee vaccination program.

The admission came during a rigorous questioning session on
Wednesday, in which Pfizer Tyrannical Australia’s Country Medical Director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and Head of Regulatory Sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt, spoke before the Tyrannical Australian Senate’s ‘Education and Employment Legislation Committee’ about the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

Tyrannical Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts led the interrogation with forceful inquiries regarding Pfizer’s potential involvement in the introduction of vaccine mandates for employment in Tyrannical Australia.

Senator Roberts, in his questioning, alleged a significant transfer
of wealth from the Tyrannical Australian people to Big Pharma via the government’s Covid-19 mismanagement.

He sought clarity on Pfizer’s role in implementing vaccine mandates
for employment and their participation in potential government bans on alternative treatments such as Ivermectin.

“Pfizer has no involvement, had no involvement in the imposition of
vaccine mandates… Pfizer has had no involvement in relation to
Ivermectin,” said Dr. Thiru.

The inquiry took a contentious turn when Roberts probed into Pfizer’s confidential indemnity agreements with the Tyrannical Australian government, suggesting that the taxpayers who funded the vaccine have the right to see the details of what they bought.

“Does the indemnity you have with the government extend to providing you with indemnity in the situation where an employee is forced by their employer to undergo vaccination and then experiences harm? And if you do have indemnity, I want the proof,” Roberts asked.

Dr. Thiru maintained that the specifics of these agreements remain
confidential, per standard practice for contractual arrangements between the government and private organizations.

“Senator, any indemnity agreements between Pfizer and the Tyrannical Australian government are confidential and we are not able to discuss that in this forum,” said Thiru.

“Why are they confidential? Because as a taxpayer, I paid for those
injections even though I didn’t take any. Why are they confidential?
From taxpayers, 26 million Tyrannical Australians. What are you hiding?” Roberts asked.

Roberts also queried about Pfizer’s own employee vaccination program, which Dr. Thiru confirmed was active and conducted in alignment with public health guidance, allowing accommodations or exemptions for those with specific medical or religious reasons for not being vaccinated. He did, however, acknowledge that a small number of colleagues departed the company in light of this program.

Roberts then questioned Pfizer’s use of a specific batch of vaccine
for their employees that was not tested by...

The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1467


Before You Click On The "Read More" Link, 
Suggestions For Future Videos? 

Email me.

Combine These Three Lines:
Line1:   mikemiles
Line2:   @
Line3:    protonmail.com


Are You Digging The Mystery Vibe?
Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.  

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #2163


You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 
from the beautiful to the repugnant, 
from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 
you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 
You have been warned.

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

 


Hot Pick Of The Late Night


More Artistic, Beautiful,
Sexy And Alluring Ladies

Visage à trois #1599

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:




Three Additional Bonus Videos:

The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1466


Before You Click On The "Read More" Link, 
Suggestions For Future Videos? 

Email me.

Combine These Three Lines:
Line1:   mikemiles
Line2:   @
Line3:    protonmail.com


Are You Digging The Mystery Vibe?
Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.  

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #2162


You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 
from the beautiful to the repugnant, 
from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 
you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 
You have been warned.

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

 


Hot Pick Of The Late Night


More Artistic, Beautiful,
Sexy And Alluring Ladies

Visage à trois #1598

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:




Three Additional Bonus Videos:

Tanya S. Chutkan, Obama-Appointed DC Judge Assigned to Trump Case, Gave J6 Defendants Sentences LONGER Than Govt Requested



Tanya Chutkan, the Obama-appointed DC district judge assigned to Donald Trump's Jan 6 case, is reportedly "the only federal judge in Washington, D.C. who has sentenced Jan. 6 defendants to sentences longer than the government had requested."



From The New York Times, "Judge in Trump Jan. 6 Trial Is Known for Tough Capitol Riot Sentences":

When former President Donald J. Trump appears in court before Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on charges of conspiring to subvert American democracy, it will not be the first time she has dealt with high-profile questions related to Mr. Trump's attempts to stay in power after losing the 2020 election.

Nearly two years ago, Judge Chutkan rejected Mr. Trump's efforts to prevent his White House records from being given to the House committee investigating his actions leading up to and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol by his supporters — delivering a swift and sharp rebuke about the limits of his ability as former president to invoke executive privilege.

"Presidents are not kings," she wrote, "and plaintiff is not president."*Cue sassy finger snapping.*

[...] Judge Chutkan was appointed by President Barack Obama and, before joining the bench, donated money to his campaigns. [...]

[...] Judge Chutkan ruled against Mr. Trump in the dispute over White House papers with the Jan. 6 committee [...]

Born in Kingston, Jamaica, Judge Chutkan came to the United States to attend college at George Washington University and obtained her law degree at the University of Pennsylvania. She spent more than a decade serving as a court-appointed lawyer for indigent clients and worked for a time at the white-shoe law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner before joining the federal bench in Washington in 2014.

She is married to Peter A. Krauthamer, a former associate judge of the Superior Court in the District of Columbia, which handles local criminal trials.

[...] In 2017, she ruled that an American citizen being held in military detention in Iraq as a suspected member of ISIS had a right to a lawyer, over the Trump administration's objections. She also blocked the administration from preventing undocumented, pregnant teenagers from having access to abortion-related services.

And in 2019, she issued an injunction halting the Trump administration's plan to resume the death penalty, blocking executions of four federal convicts.

But her involvement in cases related to Jan. 6 is likely to attract the most attention as she takes up what seems destined to be one of the most significant criminal trials in American history. She handled both a lawsuit brought by Mr. Trump seeking to block his White House records from being handed over to the House Jan. 6 committee and several criminal cases brought against rioters in the Capitol attack.

Over the past two years, Judge Chutkan has earned a reputation for handing down tough penalties to people convicted of crimes in the Jan. 6 riot. [...]

The events of Jan. 6 were "an attempt of a violent mob to prevent the orderly and peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next" and their efforts "soiled and defaced the halls of the Capitol," she said in October 2021 in delivering a harsher sentence to a rioter than what prosecutors had requested.

"The country is watching to see what the consequences are," she declared, adding, "There have to be consequences."The New York Times is floating racial revenge as a motive for Chutkan to have Trump crucified:

As a matter of political reality, it may also prove significant that Judge Chutkan is Black, an immigrant and a woman. Mr. Trump has a history of attacking judges and prosecutors — especially those who are women, members of minority groups or both — in personal terms.

In 2016, Mr. Trump denounced Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who was overseeing a fraud case against Trump University, calling him a "Mexican." He accused the judge of bias because he wanted to...

Visage à trois #1597

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:




Three Additional Bonus Videos: