Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
Oh man, you were almost there. You were that close. Then you strayed to take wrong turn. Your understanding is incomplete. Do not let your bias interfere with gaining knowledge.
Commerce says by growing your own, you are harming commerce by reducing your purchases. This is an actionable offense which brings criminal or civil charges.
Note that intent to sell to the market need not be a factor.
That’s based on a depression era Supreme Court decision that used the commerce clause in the constitution to essentially gut the 10th amendment. Everything can be tortured into an interstate commerce connection.
This decision was about a farmer growing grain for animal feed. He didn’t have a quota to grow so much, so the FedGov landed on him for exceeding what he was allowed to produce. Even though it was for his own farm, they found him guilty. SCOTUS upheld the conviction because feed he didn’t buy affected “commerce”.
Yes, those (((powers))) are still in control & leading Biden into a wider ME war for the glory of Israel.
ReplyDeleteOh man, you were almost there. You were that close. Then you strayed to take wrong turn. Your understanding is incomplete. Do not let your bias interfere with gaining knowledge.
DeleteGoing back twenty years, the Dept of Commerce has interfered with people growing their own food, beef, sheep, or dairy.
ReplyDeleteCommerce says by growing your own, you are harming commerce by reducing your purchases. This is an actionable offense which brings criminal or civil charges.
DeleteNote that intent to sell to the market need not be a factor.
That’s based on a depression era Supreme Court decision that used the commerce clause in the constitution to essentially gut the 10th amendment. Everything can be tortured into an interstate commerce connection.
DeleteThis decision was about a farmer growing grain for animal feed. He didn’t have a quota to grow so much, so the FedGov landed on him for exceeding what he was allowed to produce. Even though it was for his own farm, they found him guilty. SCOTUS upheld the conviction because feed he didn’t buy affected “commerce”.