90 Miles From Tyranny : 2018-09-23

Saturday, September 29, 2018

4Chan Ends Michael Avenatti's Career

Girls With Guns

The Witch Hunt Was Not About Kavanaugh...

Muslim migrant in Germany stabs three people with knife for “unknown reasons,” not being treated as terror-related

“Unknown reasons”? Do they really think anyone still believes that? The Islamic State (ISIS) has called upon Muslims in the West to attack random civilians. Do German authorities think they will be able to cover up jihad activity forever? Has it ever occurred to Angela Merkel that the Alliance for Germany (AfD) has arisen so quickly and gained such a massive following precisely because of obvious official dishonesty such as what we see in this case? Why do she and her lapdogs among the political and media elites think that it is their first and most important job to protect the image of Islam and not make anyone think that terror attacks are occurring? This strategy is going to lead Germany, and all of Europe, into chaos.

“Ravensburg stabbing: Three injured after knife attack in German town square,” by Neil Murphy, Mirror, September 28, 2018:

Three people have been stabbed following an incident in Ravensburg, Germany.

Police arrested one man in connection with the attack at the town’s Marienplatz square at 4.20pm on Friday.

The alleged assailant is a 19-year-old asylum seeker from Afghanistan and is reported to have attacked two young Syrian men, aged 19 and 20, and a 56-year-old German citizen.

One of the victims is being treated for life-threatening injuries.

A police statement said the incident was carried out for ‘unknown reasons’ and is not being treated as terror-related.

Footage from the scene showed a man gesticulating and waving a knife as another man stood nearby.

The attacker is believed to have stormed the square where he began his attack, according local news website Schwaebische.

The Lord Mayor of Ravensburg is believed to have intervened in the attack and urged the 19-year-old to drop the knife.

After complying with the demands, the Afghan male was...

South Africa is opening the door for tyranny.

The Constitutional Court of South Africa recently ruled that 300,000 gun owners must turn in their firearms.

This judgement came in response to the North Gauteng High Court’s ruling in 2017 which said Section 24 and Section 28 of the Firearm’s Control Act were unconstitutional.

A report from The Citizen explains what Section 24 and Section 28 entail:

“Section 24 of the Act requires that any person who seeks to renew a licence must do so 90 days before its expiry date Section 28 stipulates that if a firearm licence has been cancelled‚ the firearm must be disposed of or forfeited to the state. A 60-day time frame was placed on its disposal, which was to be done through a dealer.”

Now that the High Court’s initial ruling has been overturned, gun owners who failed to renew their firearms licenses must hand in their firearms to the nearest police station, where authorities will then proceed to destroy them.

Many naïve political observers will paint this event as a casual gun control scheme, but any astute student of politics will recognize that the floodgates are now open for further encroachments – not only on the gun rights of South Africans, but also on others facets of theirs lives.

A look at South Africa’s current political climate will give us an idea of the potential ramifications of this gun control scheme.

Political Trouble Brewing in South Africa?

Though South Africa witnessed rising levels of economic freedom shortly after Apartheid ended in 1994, the country has taken a more interventionist path to economic development in recent years.

This situation is becoming more pronounced with the South African National Assembly recently voting 241-83 to amend the South African constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation.

The socialist-leaning African National Congress (ANC) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) parties are leading the charge for expropriation under the banner of fixing racial disparities that have supposedly remained intact since Apartheid’s conclusion.

While land confiscation has not been officially finalized, South Africans should worry about the direction their country is going.

And how does gun control fit into this equation?

Gun Control: A Tool for Tyranny

No matter how socialist apologists rationalize it, the redistributionist agenda the South African government is pursuing will not be implemented passively. Ultimately, it must be carried out by force.

The kind of force socialists seek is a monopolized kind, which extreme forms of gun control like gun con-...

By Jacob Engels

Our sources in Florida’s capital city of Tallahassee, where Gillum has served as a Commissioner and now Mayor, say he was intimately involved with Adam Corey.

It is 2018. Nobody should be afraid to embrace their sexuality and be who they are. I am openly gay. We all come to terms with our sexual preference in different ways and at different times in our life.

Over the past week, a photo of Democratic gubernatorial nominee Andrew Gillum and his lifelong friend Adam Corey has been circulating online with a lot of debate over just how “close” the two had become. Corey, like myself, is openly gay.

Our sources in Tallahassee have confirmed that it is well known among capitol power-brokers that Andrew Gillum and Adam Corey were engaged in a long-term intimate relationship. Corey was once Gillum’s campaign treasurer and appeared before Gillum as a lobbyist during his time on the Tallahassee City Commission.

Corey is now the subject to and FBI corruption probe that has ensnared the Tallahassee City Commission, according to multiple news reports. As is Gillum, depending on what you are reading. Both deny being the subject of the probe. The FBI is reportedly aware of the special nature of their relationship.

As Gillum has drawn heat over failing to reimburse Corey for lavish vacations to New York and Costa Rica with a cadre of other lobbyists, he has swiftly thrown his friend of over 20 years under the bus quicker than quicksand.

They are no longer friends and have seemingly excommunicated one another from each other’s lives. So… what does it matter if Corey and Gillum did in fact engage in a long-term intimate relationship?

I would argue that Floridians deserve to know the full scope of the men or women who run for high-public office, especially any relationships that speak to their character and how they interact with those close to them who benefit financially.

In the past, Charlie Crist faced similar rumors alleging that he was either bi-sexual or gay. It started with a whisper campaign and articles similar to this one, ending with several men coming forward. Crist would go on to marry Carol Rome (they are now divorced), however the rumors still persist and remain prevalent among Florida politicos to this day. The former Governor is now a Congressman in the Tampa area.

These rumors and alleged relationships with other men caused Crist legal trouble in 2012 when he was sued by former Republican Party of Florida Chairman Jim Greer. For Crist, most of the allegations were during his single years, and make his case quite different than Gillum’s.

Given the fact that Gillum is a married man and father, these alleged interludes with Corey over a long period of time present several problems for not only his campaign, but his potential governorship.

What if Mr. Corey has compromising information on Gillum that he could use to influence his actions as Governor if he were elected? More importantly… IF these allegations are indeed true… why would we want to elect someone who is not being honest with us about who they...

Staffer For Andrew Gillum, Running For Florida Governor FIRED After Trump Assassination Tweet

Manny Orozco Ballestas, who we exposed for calling all Trump voters dumbf****, deleted close to 30,000 tweets after our report.

We have all had a little bit too much to drink and made a “martini tweet”. I don’t deny it and neither should you. However, Democratic candidate for Governor Andrew Gillum’s Youth Director went far past an off-color joke.

Manny Orozco Ballestas, who worked in a high level position with Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential campaign in 2016, was exposed by the Central Florida Post for posing in a t-shirt calling Trump voters members of “Dumbfuckistan.”

Andrew Gillum refused to fire the staffer and has kept Ballestas in his employ to this date. Now we have obtained deleted tweets from Ballestas that showcase his affinity for body shaming, sexism, pedophilia, and murder.

In tweets provided to us by an anonymous source, Ballestas demonstrates exactly why he should not be in charge of children or in any leadership position with Andrew Gillum’s campaign for Governor of Florida.

We will analyze each tweet as we post them all below. These are his alleged deleted tweets after we exposed him earlier this week for being a political bigot.

In this tweet, Manny Orozco Ballestas shames a fellow female college student for having more leg hair than him. What happened to Democrats and progressives embracing the body-positivity movement? This female should showcase her unshaven body without shame.

This tweet is simply disgusting. It reasons that young babies using a pacifier are somehow preparing to suck Manny’s penis. Why is he thinking about infants that may or may not be men/woman performing oral sex on his unimpressive and deformed penis?

The Kardashian’s are fame seeking weirdos, but for a progressive Democrat to describe any woman as a “cunt” is hypocritical and sexist.

Manny actually advocated for the murder of a public figure. This tweet was posted years before Donald Trump ran for President. Why hasn’t Jack Dorsey and Twitter deleted this tweet that calls for the murder of someone? Is he too busy silencing conservative actor James Woods for posting a funny meme?

*Even More Disgusting Tweets Removed From This Article*

In response to the Tweets, a representative with the Gillum campaign confirmed that Orozco Ballestas no longer works for the campaign.

The fact that Gillum employed a man who tweeted pedophiliac tweet, and call to murder Donald Trump, is plenty enough for many voters to question his...

Sen. Flake’s Screaming ‘Victims’ Were George Soros Babes

The women who were filmed screaming at Arizona Senator Jeff Flake and quickly became a liberal “heroes” were just identified as a Soros plants:

The screaming leftists cornered the Arizona Republican at the US Capitol Friday morning as he made his way to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing where, he’d just announced, he would be voting to confirm Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

With Flake trapped in the elevator, the women berated him for his intended vote supporting Kavanaugh, screaming, “This is not tolerable!”

“You have children in your family. Think about them! I have two children. I cannot imagine that for the next 50 years they will have to have someone in the Supreme Court who has been accused of violating a young girl. What are you doing, sir?!” one of the women yelled while blocking the elevator door.

Flake silently listened, nodding occasionally before escaping to the Committee hearing where, after private meetings with Senate Democrats, he gave the left what they wanted. Flake announced to the panel that he would only vote for Kavanaugh if the Senate vote was delayed and another FBI investigation was allowed to be conducted.
And as liberals cheered the news, it was soon clear that the screaming women by the elevator were actually Soros-funded astroturfed activists.Shortly after the incident with Flake, Ana Maria Archila and Maria Gallagher were caught celebrating:

Archila even wrote about the incident with Senator Flake:

“Shortly after, CNN reported that Flake was visibly shaken after his encounter with us. Our words, and the words of thousands of women who have shared their stories, moved him.”

Turns out Ana Maria Archila is the co-executive director for the Center for Popular Democracy and the Center for Popular Democracy Action Fund, both heavily funded by George Soros.

Who could have ever predicted that George Soros would be paying people to...

Lunch with the Pope

President Trump invited the Pope for lunch on his mega yacht, the Pope accepted and during lunch, a puff of wind blew the Pontiff's hat off, right into the water.

It floated off about 50 feet, then the wind died down and it just floated in place.

The crew and the secret service were scrambling to launch a boat to go get it, when Trump waved them off, saying "Never mind, boys, I'll get it."

The Donald climbed over the side of the yacht, walked on the water to the hat, picked it up, walked back on the water, climbed into the yacht, and handed the Pope his hat.

The crew was speechless. The security team and the Pope's entourage were speechless.

No one knew what to say, not even the Pope.

But that afternoon, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN reported: "TRUMP CAN'T SWIM!"

Archaeologists Found A Stonehenge-like arranged boulders In Lake Michigan, One Of Them Is With A Prehistoric Carving Of A Mastodon
The crazy life and crazier death of Tycho Brahe, history's strangest astronomer
The Consequences Of Government Tyranny...
Twin Mysterious Stories About Two Sets Of Twins
General George S. Patton’s dog on the day of Patton’s death on December 21st, 1945..
The Legend of Sawney Bean
The Emperor's Seed
The Experiment..
Paid In Full..
On Submarines And Sabotage In World War II
Tales From The Bog...
The Rich Man, The Poor Man, And The Politician...
Get Out Of The Car!
Arithmetic For The Unsuspecting Commuter..
The two nuns
The Devoted Wife...
Guess Who Won This Contest?
Bananas And Monkeys
Let Us Put The Obama Administration In Perspective...
THIS IS GOOD..
Hippo Eats Dwarf..
Always Wear Underwear...
The Story Of The Butterfly
How Reggie Became Tank...
World's most unsolved mysteries.
The two nuns
More Interesting Stories, Amazing or Funny Things CLICK HERE

Interesting, Thoughtful And Funny Stories Collection #3

The Crow, The Paper Plate And The Fantastic Deed.... -Or- Amazing Stories Collection #4

Why Another FBI Investigation of Kavanaugh Would Be Pointless

Campaigns of whatever sort often adopt a mantra, a phrase, or even a single word that’s repeated over and over to advance the campaign’s goals. The campaign against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is no different, and its latest mantra is “FBI investigation.” Let’s look at this mantra’s objectives and its validity.

The call for another FBI investigation, which dominated the Sept. 27 hearing about Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh, appears to have multiple partisan objectives, based on statements made by those opposed to his confirmation.

First, Kavanaugh’s opponents have expressed hope that the continued controversy will help defeat the nomination. Barring that, they have indicated that they want to drag the process out at least past Election Day. Third, according to Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Democrats would keep this seat open until President Donald Trump leaves office if they win control of the Senate in the upcoming election.

This demand for another FBI investigation is not valid and based on a complete misunderstanding of the bureau’s role. First, Kavanaugh’s opponents want people to think that the FBI is on standby, ready to run down all the leads and figure out what really happened.

That may be what a law enforcement agency does in the criminal justice system—as seen on TV—but not in the confirmation process.

That distinction between the criminal justice system and the confirmation process is critical. The FBI is in the executive branch, which has authority over the criminal justice system. The confirmation process, however, occurs in the legislative branch. The Constitution gives the Senate sole responsibility for evaluating presidential nominees.

In the criminal justice system, the FBI investigates by not only gathering information but evaluating it, making judgments about the credibility of witnesses or the truth of what they say, pursuing leads, and offering conclusions or even recommendations. In other words, they figure out what really happened.

In the confirmation process, the FBI gathers information and stops there. The Senate must do the rest. In fact, as CBS News recently described it, the FBI “conducts a background check at the request of the White House, mainly to determine whether the nominee would pose a risk to national security interests of the United States, according to the Justice Department.”

That has already been done. It’s worth noting that this “full-field” FBI investigation has been conducted every time Kavanaugh was hired or appointed to a significant government position. Six times between 1993 and 2018, the FBI went talking to people about Kavanaugh. Six times, all after the incident that Ford alleges, the FBI never heard anyone even whisper a word about sexual misconduct.

Kavanaugh’s opponents not only want people to think that the FBI has a criminal justice role in the confirmation process, but they mislead people to think that if the FBI does not jump in, there will be no investigation of Ford’s allegation. The people actually responsible for investigating these allegations are the Judiciary Committee’s own investigative staff and they have been hard at work for nearly two weeks. The list of steps they have taken is...