90 Miles From Tyranny

Friday, April 5, 2019

Grisly murder by Muslim immigrant ignites asylum debate in Austria

An Iraqi immigrant who arrived in Austria years ago, had his residency permit withdrawn in 2011 because of his long criminal record. Despite that, he did not leave the country. He is now on trial for the murder of his fiancée.

Daban K. stabbed his fiancé Nagsha R. to death because she mocked his penis

Iraqi Koerd stabbed his partner, who was a mother of five, four times

Suspect accused the attack on her mocking him and said he was & # 39; not a real man & # 39;

She hid Daban K. from the Austrian authorities after attacking a previous victim

These disturbing events have prompted a debate about the asylum system in Austria after Vienna’s Regional Court convicted an immigrant from Iraq, Daban K of murdering his partner, a mother of seven (or five, according to some reports).

His illegal stay in Austria may have been turned into a life sentence in prison, although the decision is not final.

The 40-year-old admitted to stabbing the woman, in whose apartment he lived over recent months and whom he reportedly wanted to marry. He had previously denied his guilt, claiming that “she had wounded herself”.

According to the Austrian newspaper Der Standard, he “loved this woman a lot” but her complaints about too much sex and his hashish consumption had left him insulted feeling insulted.

“She insulted my manhood, she said I do not even have hair on my chest”, the murder suspect explained to the court.

“She cheated on me three times with other men and did not want to sleep with me anymore, and, at some point, she said my penis was too small”, he told a psychiatrist, according to the Austrian magazine Heute.

A neighbour heard the woman screaming “Save me, he wants to slaughter me!” He saw Daban stabbing her and then pile an armchair, table and, shawls over the lifeless body leaving the scene of the murder calmly.

The details of this grisly knife murder has raised questions about the Austrian asylum system, according to the website oe.24.

The migrant’s asylum application was reportedly rejected in 2005, but he was deported because he was “entitled to subsidiary protection”. This status was withdrawn in 2011 after the man was convicted of extortion, but he ignored the order and even filed another asylum application.

In 2016, the migrant was reportedly sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking, and in the same year he was sentenced to nine months behind bars for...

The current iteration of the Democratic Party has moved increasingly toward the left in recent years. It has shifted far from the classic liberal positions it once held to an embrace of openly Marxist and socialist policies.

This was evident during the opening of a recent major forum for Democrats that was sponsored by numerous high-profile Democrat-affiliated groups and featured numerous high-profile Democratic speakers, including several top 2020 presidential candidates, according to a report from Mediaite.

That forum was the 2019 We The People Summit in Washington D.C. The event began with opening remarks from NAACP leader Jamal Watkins, in which he lead the crowd in a chanted quote from a convicted cop-killer who is also an avowed Marxist communist.

The chant led by Watkins stated, “It is our duty to fight for our freedom. It is our duty to win. We must love each other and support each other. We have nothing to lose but our chains.”

That was a direct quote from convicted cop-killer Assata Shakur, also known as Joanne Chesimard. Her quote was itself a mangled adaptation of a quote from Karl Marx, whose writings inspired the communist/socialist movement that has proven so deadly and destructive over the past century-plus.

That quote from Marx read, “Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.”

In other words, a major Democratic Party political forum just kicked off with what was essentially a call to arms for a socialist revolution … not exactly something the Democratic Party of years past would have done.

As for Shakur, she was a member of the Black Panthers and Black Liberation Army in the 1970s when she shot and killed a New Jersey state trooper. She was eventually convicted of murder, but ultimately escaped and was granted asylum by Cuba’s communist...

You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?

It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,

from the beautiful to the repugnant,

from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,

you could be inspired, you could be appalled.

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.

You have been warned.

Girls With Guns

Are Avocados More Important That National Security/Sovereignty?

This Is What You Call Building Infrastructure For The Future Society...

House Democrats Want ‘Oversight’ over Fox News’ Editorial Decisions

Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives are demanding to know why Fox News did not publish a story prior to the 2016 election about an alleged affair years before between porn star Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump.

House Committee on Oversight and Reform chair Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) wrote to former Fox News reporter Diana Falzone last month demanding that she turn over any documents relating to Trump’s alleged extramarital affairs.

An article in the New Yorker last month alleged that Fox News executive Ken LaCorte spiked the story to protect Trump — a claim LaCorte has vehemently denied, saying the story lacked corroborating evidence and that the network was merely practicing responsible journalism, as were other outlets who declined the story.

That article seems to have motivated Cummings’s letter — a letter that not only seeks personal dirt on the president, but seeks information that might be used to review Fox News’ editorial decisions. The committee’s letter suggests that Fox News may have violated campaign finance rules if it tried to help Trump by suppressing the Daniels story.

Falzone has said she will cooperate with the committee, despite an agreement with Fox that prevents her from speaking about the story. In an op-ed at Mediaite, LaCorte says he supports Falzone’s desire to talk about the story publicly, but that he will refuse to cooperate with...

TEXAS TEACHER ASSIGNS ANTI-TRUMP ESSAY AS CLASS HOMEWORK

Seventh grade assignment characterized the president as “racist” and questioned whether he should be impeached.

A middle school teacher in the public Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District near Houston assigned 12 and 13 year old seventh grade students to read and answer questions on an essay blasting President Donald Trump as “racist,” “insensitive,” and counter to American values as part of a lesson on inferring information from written text.

Even for seventh grade students who are not overly familiar with politics, it is easy to parse the message of the piece which essentially translates as ‘Dump Trump.’ Titled, “Trump Against American Values,” the essay begins, “Throughout Donald Trump’s time in the American spotlight, we have come to see his true colors. From the beginning of his presidency, we have witnessed insensitive remarks toward other racial and cultural groups.”

The assignment goes on to say that “Some of Trump’s policies have gone against what Americans value most, like the freedom of opportunity” and labels the president as “insensitive” for his focus on building a wall on the border with Mexico.

The piece concludes with remarks that could well have been lifted from a campaign commercial for one of Trump’s 2020 Democratic challengers:

“With all of these racist remarks by our president, I think that we as a people need to take a stand and show that we will not accept this kind of leadership in our country.”

Multiple choice questions follow this political diatribe. One asks, "Which of the following conclusions would the author most likely agree with?" The possible answers include, “Donald Trump should not be president” and “America’s future is in grave danger.”

A second question asks the middle schoolers to complete the sentence, "The reader can infer that ..." The available options include, “Mexican Americans are the major group upset with President Trump” and “The United States will impeach Donald Trump.”

The politically charged assignment was made public by Texas state representative Briscoe Cain, a Republican, who was made aware of it by a parent in his district.

Cain minced no words in calling out the school district and teacher (whose name has not been released) in a post on Facebook:

"This individual has violated the sacred trust that every parent has with the State of Texas when they send their child into a public school," Cain stated of the teacher who assigned the anti-Trump essay. "They have lost the privilege of being in a classroom with Texas children, and forfeit the title of teacher. No teacher should attempt to indoctrinate a child to their ideology, no matter who is...