90 Miles From Tyranny

Friday, October 25, 2019

When The Inept Want To Rule...

The Globalists’ Race Against Time on China

A military parade at Tienanmen Square celebrated the 70th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution

To recap briefly, most of the communist countries collapsed by 1991 and the Western democratic tradition was seen as the winner of an existential battle that had waged since the Russian Revolution of 1917. Historian Francis Fukuyama called it “the end of history” because only good things would happen thereafter. Mankind’s ideological evolution had ended and Western liberal democracy would be the final form of government.

In response to that wishful thinking, Harvard historian Samuel Huntington wrote a paper, and subsequently a book, entitled The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order in which he predicted that with the end of ideological conflict the world would revert to a normal state of affairs characterized by cultural conflict. In particular, Professor Huntington predicted an attack by Islamists on the United States. That attack duly happened five years later. Huntington had identified China and Islam as “challenger civilizations.”

But there is a third force attacking civilization that hasn’t been officially recognized until recently, when President Trump named it in his speech to the United Nations on September 24. That speech began by deploring Chinese aggression:

It is the divide between those whose thirst for control deludes them into thinking they are destined to rule over others and those people and nations who want only to rule themselves.

Then continued on to its main thrust with this line:

The future does not belong to globalists.

So who are the globalists and what do they want? The globalists date back to Cecil Rhodes in the late 19th century. He thought the elite of the English-speaking world should run the whole planet. The early history of the globalist effort was recorded by Carroll Quigley in his book Tragedy and Hope, first published in 1966. Carroll Quigley was then a professor of history at Georgetown University and a mentor of then-Georgetown undergraduate Bill Clinton.

Globalist central is the Council on Foreign Relations, founded in 1921. Its main propaganda outlet is the magazine Foreign Policy. The purpose of Foreign Policy is to bathe its readers in the preferred narrative, rewriting history as necessary. For example Foreign Policy had been blindly pro-China until it was decided that China’s recidivism was threatening to thwart the globalist vision. So now Foreign Policy is publishing...

Leftist Narrative Destruction Picture Of The Day #3

Leftist Narrative Destruction Picture Of The Day #2

Leftist Narrative Destruction Picture Of The Day #1

Judge Grants Parents Joint Custody of 7-Year-Old James Younger, Which May Halt Forced Gender Transition

The young boy is being forced to transition into a girl by his mother.

Judge Kim Cooks has granted joint custody to the parents of 7-year-old James Younger, a young boy who has been encouraged to transition into a girl by his mother.

Jeffrey Younger and his ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas, have been involved in a bitter court battle over their twin children, James and Jude, for many months now. Georgulas wants to transition James from a boy into a girl named “Luna” and pump him full of puberty blockers before he reaches the age of 10.

In a heartbreaking video, James can be seen explaining how his mother is cajoling him to become a girl and potentially ruin his life forever.

Making matters worse, Georgulas is a licensed pediatrician in Coppell, TX. She may be using her authority to push her Mengelean gender beliefs on other unsuspecting parents and children.

On Monday, a jury decided on an 11-1 ruling to terminate the Joint Managing Conservatorship to both parents and deny the Sole Managing Conservatorship to Mr. Younger over his twin boys. This effectively allowed Georgulas, who admitted during court proceedings that she is not the biological mother to the twin boys, to continue transitioning James into a girl without any input from...

DOJ opens criminal probe into 'Russiagate' investigation after administrative review – Subpoena Power Activated

The US Department of Justice has reportedly moved to launch a criminal inquiry into the roots of the 'Russiagate' probe, which fizzled after failing to uncover any damning evidence of collusion between the US president and Moscow.

A months-long review launched by Attorney General William Barr into the origins of the ill-fated Russia investigation, repeatedly denounced by US President Donald Trump as a “hoax” and a “witch hunt,” has been transformed to a criminal inquiry, multiple media outlets reported late Thursday, citing US officials.

The move, if confirmed, would give DOJ officials more leverage in conducting the ever-expanding investigation, such as issuing subpoenas to prospective witnesses and filing criminal charges. It’s yet unclear if the grand jury had been convened in the case, a source told Reuters.

The review of the so-called ‘Russiagate’ saga was ordered by Barr back in May, when he appointed John Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut, to run the investigation.

“To the extent there was overreach, what we have to be concerned about is a few people at the top getting it into their heads that they know better than the American people,” Barr said back then.

The review was focused on determining whether the FBI and other intelligence agencies that brought the Russia probe to life broke the law with their intelligence gathering methods – including while obtaining a wiretap warrant to monitor Trump aide Carter Page.The warrant, as it later emerged, was partially grounded in the infamous Steele dossier, which remained uncorroborated at the time and is generally unverifiable.

In April, shortly before the formal launch of the review, Barr drew the wrath of Democrats for saying that “spying did occur” during the heated 2016 presidential campaign. While many liberals pounced on the AG, urging him to...

As The Wall Street Journal reports, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in an email Thursday:

“Not renewing subscriptions across all federal agencies will be a significant cost saving - hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars will be saved."

The decision comes days after the president cancelled the White House’s print subscriptions to the Post and the Times after expressing frustration with their coverage.

“We don’t even want it in the White House anymore,” Mr. Trump said of the Times during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity that aired Monday night.

“We’re going to probably terminate that and the Washington Post. They’re fake.”

Additionally, The Journal reports that a White House official confirmed that print editions of the Times and the Post weren’t among the newspapers delivered to the White House on Thursday.

Before You Click On The "Read More" Link,

Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?

It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,

from the beautiful to the repugnant,

from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,

you could be inspired, you could be appalled.

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.

You have been warned.

US Army developing 1,000 mile ‘supercannon’ to counter Chinese military capabilities in the Pacific

The U.S. Army is working on what it believes could be a “game-changing” weapon in its efforts to counter advanced adversaries like China.

The Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC) project is aiming to deliver an artillery piece that can enable precision strikes from beyond a 1,000 miles away. The technology is still in its development stages but the Army hopes to test this artillery piece by 2023, according to the Washington Times.

The technology behind the SLRC remains in development but is just one effort led by the Pentagon to equip its forces with “long-range precision fires” around the world and prepare for advance U.S. military doctrine to counter China or other military powers in a potential future conflict.

“If you look at doctrinally how the U.S. military uses long-range fires to shoot and then maneuver … it’s one of the most important capabilities that we have as an entire Department of Defense,” Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy told The Washington Times.

China’s recent focus on anti-access, area-denial weapons systems could threaten the U.S. ability to move and launch counter-attacks in disputed international regions, such as the South China sea where the U.S. has worked to counter military Chinese posturing.

China has reportedly purchased Russian-made S-400 missile defense systems which could stall or even entirely prevent U.S. ships and planes that attempt to protect free passage in the South China Sea. China may also possess anti-satellite missiles able to disable U.S. satellite communications systems.

The long-range artillery could give a high-tech form of suppressing fire for U.S. military movements through heavily controlled regions and allow strikes against targets more difficult to reach by seaborne or airborne strikes.

“That integrated system challenges even our most sophisticated aircraft and challenges our most sophisticated ships to gain access to the area,” said Col. John Rafferty, director of the long-range precision fires cross-functional team. “That layered enemy standoff at the strategic level was really the fundamental problem. One of the ways to solve that problem is to deliver surface-to-surface fires that can penetrate this [anti-access, area-denial] complex, disintegrate its network and create windows of opportunity for...