90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Friday, February 12, 2021

4 Takeaways From Democrats’ Second Full Day of Arguments to Disqualify Trump
















In a second full day of making their case for disqualifying Donald Trump from running again for president, House Democrats reminded the Senate of the Charlottesville riot in 2017 and a plot last year to kidnap Michigan’s governor.

The nine House impeachment managers, or prosecutors, kept most of the focus Thursday on a mob’s Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, but also brought up some of Trump’s comments as a candidate for president in 2015.

The House impeached Trump on a single charge of incitement to insurrection, and Democrats sought to establish a pattern of incitement to convince senators to convict the 45th president and disqualify him from holding a future federal office.

House impeachment managers also said more than once that the cost of beefed-up, militarized security for the Capitol is expected to cost taxpayers $480 million through mid-March. The Democrats argued that the presence of National Guard troops and perimeter fencing was a result of the riot they allege Trump incited.

It would take the votes of 67 senators, or a two-thirds majority, to convict Trump. If Democrats reached that threshold, it would take only a simple majority vote to disqualify Trump from holding federal office again.

The prosecution and the defense each have up to 16 hours to make their case at the Senate impeachment trial, for which Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., not a federal judge, is presiding.

The House prosecution team wrapped up before 4:30 p.m. with about five hours left. Trump’s lawyers are set to begin making their case Friday, and reportedly will spend only that one day making their case.

Here are key highlights from the third day of Trump’s historic second impeachment trial, which also is the first such trial of a former president. 

1. ‘Message’ of U.S. Adversaries

China, Russia, and Iran seized on the riot at the Capitol to mock America’s commitment to democracy and human rights, Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, told senators, directing their attention to large screens showing quotes from officials of foreign governments.

“What message will we send the rest of the world? We already know the message some of our adversaries took from Jan. 6,” Castro said.

After reading off several examples of talking points from America’s enemies, he said: “We cannot let them use what happened on Jan. 6 to define us, who we are and what we stand for.”

U.S. intelligence agencies are working to determine how many intelligence documents may have been stolen as rioters stormed the building, some leaving with laptops and documents stolen from members of Congress who are privy to classified information, Castro said.

The attack also demonstrated to terrorists that federal buildings are vulnerable, he argued.

“We have spent trillions of dollars building the strongest military in the world, and billions of dollars on the most sophisticated weaponry on the planet, to prevent the kind of attack that occurred at this Capitol on Jan. 6,” Castro said. 

2. ‘Most Violent … So Far’

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., leader of the impeachment managers, called the mob’s attack on the Capitol the “culmination of the president’s actions.”

“The insurrection was the most violent and dangerous episode so far in Donald Trump’s continuing pattern and practice of inciting violence, but I emphasize so far,” Raskin said.

A mob began breaking into the Capitol while Trump continued to address supporters in a rally just south of the White House, using the word “fight” as Congress was meeting in joint session to certify what Trump called a “stolen” election.

The Maryland Democrat said Trump has stirred supporters to violence in the past with a “wink and nod,” not a direct order, he argued.

Raskin warned senators of the potential consequences of allowing Trump to become president again:


Is there any political leader in this room who believes that, if he is ever allowed by the Senate to get back into the Oval Office, Donald Trump would stop inciting violence to get his way? Would you bet the lives of more police officers on that? Would you bet the safety of your family on that? Would you bet the future of your democracy on that? … If he gets back into office and it happens again, we’ll have no one to blame but ourselves.

Raskin added: “If you don’t find this a high crime and misdemeanor today, you have set a new, terrible standard for presidential misconduct in the United States of America.”

The outcome of the riot and breach of the Capitol could have been far worse, as some in the mob openly talked of killing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, then-Vice President Mike Pence, and other members of Congress, Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., argued.

“What if President Trump had been successful? What if he had succeeded in overturning the will of the people and our constitutional processes?” Cicilline said. “Who among us is willing to risk that outcome by letting Trump’s constitutional crimes go unanswered?”

3. Recalling Charlottesville

Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., delivered a presentation that included video of violence during the 2017 riot in Charlottesville, Virginia, in which white nationalists clashed with the leftist extremist group Antifa.

“I’d argue we’re not just back where we were,” DeGette told senators. “I would argue things are worse. In 2017, it was unfathomable to most of us to think that Charlottesville could happen.”

Cicilline said many of the Capitol rioters apparently were white nationalists who carried Confederate flags and harassed black police officers and janitorial staff with racial epithets.

“And then after all that, these same workers, many of them people of color, were forced to clean up the mess left by mobs of white nationalists,” Cicilline said, adding:


One member of the janitorial staff reflected how terrible he felt when he had to clean up feces that had been smeared on the wall, blood of a rioter who had died, broken glass, and other objects strewn all over the floor. He said, ‘I felt bad. I felt degraded.’

4. ‘Donald Trump Sent Them’

DeGette showed images of rioters on large screens and asked rhetorically, “Looking at these people makes you...

Morning Mistress

The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #562



Before You Click On The "Read More" Link, 

Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.  

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #1262


You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 
from the beautiful to the repugnant, 
from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 
you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 
You have been warned.

Hot Pick Of The Late Night


Thursday, February 11, 2021

I'm Good...


 

Girls With Guns


It's Time To Surrender Our Firearms....

When You See This....


 

One Of These Women Will Be President One Day...

 


Which One Do You Pick?

You Know That Your Justice System is Corrupt When:

Absolute Proof - Mike Lindell Election Documentary (FULL)


 

‘F–ing bring it’: Matt Gaetz fires back at anti-Trump GOP Rep Adam Kinzinger for targeting his seat


If anyone thought U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz was worried about plans by hardcore anti-Trump, pro-impeachment House colleague and Air Force vet Adam Kinzinger (R -Ill.) to oust him from office, the self-described Florida Man and tenacious Donald Trump supporter set the record straight on Twitter.

He also subsequently claimed that Kinzinger might be harboring some personal animosity for the ex-president unrelated to the impeachment proceedings.

“Adam is a patriot who fought for America from Northwest Florida. We will always appreciate & honor his service. Now, he wants to target my America First politics, referencing me by name. My response: F*****g bring it. Adam needs PACs to win elections. I don’t.” Gaetz declared. Gaetz has previously disavowed accepting any campaign contributions from PACs.

Kinzinger has set up the so-called Country First Political Action Committee to boost candidates that will return to what he deems “conservative” policies, which many on the populist, pro-Trump right might derisively call Conservative Inc., or the establishment wing of the Republican Party, exemplified by he and Liz Cheney, among others. Presumably, the organization would mount primary challenges against office holders who backed Trump.

Whether the Country First PAC turns out to be the Lincoln Project 2.0 remains to be seen, although it’s difficult to discern how Kinzinger’s effort would gain many converts, given that the American First philosophy is still on the ascendancy even with Trump out of office.

It’s Country First vs. American First in a fight for what Kinzinger considers the soul of the party.

Gaetz, one of President Trump’s strongest allies in Congress, wants to rid the party of pro-impeachment Cheney and other establishment, globalist politicians. Many of them favor endless overseas war and presided over shipping American jobs overseas and the hollowing out of the U.S. manufacturing base, among other things.

The Florida Man backs politicians who embrace Trump’s America First agenda that actually expanded the GOP base in the last two election cycles.

Nearly 75 million people voted for Trump in 2020, the most of any Republican candidate.

In a media interview, Kinzinger described the GOP as broken, however, and identified Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene as potential political targets for the PAC, claiming that both them were just in it for the stardom “I think neither of them believes the stuff they ascribe to, they just want fame,” Kinzinger insisted.

Gaetz claims however, that Kinzinger was allegedly seeking some fame for himself, implying that he developed hard feelings for Donald Trump when he didn’t get a promotion from the-then POTUS.

“@RepKinzinger wasn’t a *never* Trumper. He wanted to be President Trump’s Secretary of the Air Force & sought my support for the role, which (at the time) I unsuccessfully gave. When he wasn’t selected, his views on Trump…well you see…”

It wouldn’t be the first instance that personal rivalries or a bruised ego masqueraded as policy differences especially because politicians typically have their eye on the next job. Moreover, Kinzinger is getting a lot of face time in the liberal media for bashing Trump and calling for the U.S. Senate to convict the now private citizen in the impeachment trial.

Rep. Kinzinger responded to Gaetz with a Gif from the movie Top Gun, which is pretty clever. He and other Never Trumpers may be operating in an alternate reality, however, by assuming that there is a large constituency or sufficient grassroots support behind anti-Trump Republicans.

Against this backdrop, about 100 anti-Trump Republicans supposedly are giving serious consideration to setting up a center-right third party that would counter America First candidates by either running against them or endorsing...

On Chinese CoronaVirus Vaccine Side-effects: