90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Thursday, December 28, 2023

Colorado GOP Takes Trump Ballot Battle to Supreme Court






The Colorado Republican Party has appealed the state's ballot ban targeting President Trump in the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Colorado GOP filed a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, seeking a review of the Colorado Supreme Court decision that allowed the state to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the ballot based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

On Dec. 19, the Colorado Supreme Court, in a controversial move, declared President Trump ineligible, invoking a provision that bars individuals who have engaged in "insurrection" against the United States from holding office.
The state's Supreme Court stayed its ruling until Jan. 4, 2024—the day before ballots are due to be printed—or until an appeal is made to the U.S. Supreme Court (pdf).

Now, with the Colorado GOP's petition and President Trump's lawyers indicating their intention to appeal the decision, the stay looks to be extended until the U.S. Supreme Court's decision.

In its petition, the state GOP argues that it has been irreparably harmed by the Colorado Supreme Court decision. "The Colorado Supreme Court has removed the leading Republican candidate from the primary and general ballots, fundamentally changing the course of American democracy," the petition reads.

The filing asserts that unless the state Supreme Court's decision is overturned, "any voter will have the power to sue to disqualify any political candidate, in Colorado or in any other jurisdiction that follows its lead."

"This will not only distort the 2024 presidential election but will also mire courts henceforth in political controversies over nebulous accusations of insurrection," the petition reads.

The appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to set the stage for a significant legal battle with potentially far-reaching implications for the disqualification of presidential candidates based on the 14th Amendment.

GOP Says Colorado Supreme Court Exceeded Its AuthorityThe Colorado Republican Party, in its petition for a writ of certiorari, wrote that the state Supreme Court's unprecedented decision urgently merits review to prevent "the potential chaos wrought by an imprudent, unconstitutional, and standardless system in which each state gets to adjudicate Section Three disqualification cases on an ad hoc basis."

Lawyers for the Colorado GOP argue that, based on the specific language of the U.S. Constitution and historical context, the president is excluded from the disqualification provision of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment because "the President is not an officer of...

Morning Mistress

 

The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1602

 


Before You Click On The "Read More" Link, 

Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.  

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


There is no format, no topic. 
I will always choose something different over predictable. 
I Want To Surprise You.


Suggestions For Future Videos? Email me.

Combine These Three Lines:
Line1:   mikemiles
Line2:   @
Line3:    protonmail.com


Are You Digging The Mystery Video Vibe?
..Then Check This:


The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1


The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #2307


You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 
from the beautiful to the repugnant, 
from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 
you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 
You have been warned.

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

 

Wednesday, December 27, 2023

Girls With Guns

Visage à trois #1977

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:




Three Additional Bonus Videos:

Visage à trois #1976

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:




Three Additional Bonus Videos:

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1524

More Spoonage HERE











Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1522

Visage à trois #1975

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:




Three Additional Bonus Videos:

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1523

 









Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #1522


The AI Axe Will Fall First on Bureaucrats and Journalists








I was reading a piece about EA -- Effective Altruism -- its intellectual godfather the utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer, and how billionaires from Elon Musk to SBF are directing billions into solving global poverty with EA. Then all of a sudden the writer swung into a discussion of AI -- Artificial Intelligence -- and the challenge of saving the world when AI really gets going.

I tell you what I think. I think that EA and AI are nothing more or less than Socialism 2.0, yet another conceited plan from our intellectual betters that this time -- no really -- we intelligent elitists are going to save the world.

And then I thought some Wrongthink. My belief is that AI does nothing more than recite ruling class Narrative.

Okay, let's do a test. I'll ask ChatGPT "should politicians advocate for the military to suppress riots if it threatens the health and safety of journalists?" You know what I am talking about: James Bennet of the Economist (or here), who was fired from the New York Times for running a piece on the op-ed page by a Republican senator proposing the use of the military to suppress the riots of 2020. You see,

The newspaper guild protested that running the piece presented “a clear threat to the health and safety of the journalists we represent.”

Of course: goes without saying.

Back to ChatGPT, and you will be glad to know that the geniuses on the server farm didn’t fail me:

The decision to deploy the military is a complex and sensitive one that involves weighing several factors… including the protection of journalists…

It's crucial to strike a balance between public order and safeguarding civil liberties.

But I have to admit that I jumped the gun on this. After reading all the flibbertigibbet stuff about EA and AI I thought to myself: You know who will be the first to fall to the ax of AI? Bureaucrats. Especially government bureaucrats. Because the job of government bureaucrats is to pour out regime Narrative, and don't you dare deviate one iota from the day's approved Narrative. That's why AI is way better for advancing regime Narrative than bureaucrats who may be having a spot of bother on the plagiarism front.

And guess who is Number Two on the list (and yes, I've got a little list… They never would be missed)? I give you one guess:


Yes, of course: journalists.

Experts agree that AI is far from replacing journalists. But its use can present significant advantages as well as critical challenges that can dramatically transform the way information is created and spread among the public.

Thank goodness the experts agree on this!

Of course, James Bennet in his Economist piece has something to say about that. Back in the day, he hired on as a probationary reporter at the Times.
After about six months the Metro editor, Gerald Boyd, asked me to take a walk with him, as it turned out, to deliver a harsh lesson in Timesian ambition and discipline. Chain-smoking, speaking in his whispery, peculiarly high-pitched voice, he kicked my ass from one end of Times Square to the other. He had taken a chance hiring me, and he was disappointed.
Bennet called Boyd back on a Sunday to ask for another chance, and so Boyd sent him out to do an in-depth report on the elderly. Then he sent him to Detroit to do in-depth reporting on the auto industry. And now he has been fired by the Times, so you know he is on the right track.

But what about health? What about safety?

Here’s what I think. EA and AI are healthy, safe, abstract, pro forma. Real life is dirty, dangerous, full of mistakes, and right in your face. I’m a bit surprised that Elon Musk is involved in EA, because his life seems to be organized around the real-life principle of never being afraid to make mistakes.

But back to bureaucrats. Curtis Yarvin suggests that the Next Regime should start by pensioning off all the bureaucrats, on the assumption that...