Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Monday, February 19, 2018
NEW YORK TIMES: RUSSIAN MEDDLING WAS DROP IN AN OCEAN
Yesterday, Powerline Blog wrote that Russia’s efforts during the 2016 election season to sow discord in the electorate and to libel certain candidates were surely inconsequential, given the amount of garbage with which Americans themselves contaminate our politics. Suggesting that Russia’s efforts affected the outcome or even, appreciably, the tenor of this election “is like saying that dropping a bucket of water into the sea affected the tide,” I concluded.
This is also the view of New York Times writers Amanda Taub and Max Fisher. They express it in an article called “Russian Meddling Was a Drop in an Ocean of American-made Discord.”
Actually, the article is somewhat more wishy-washy than the title suggests. It consists mostly of the usual moaning about how toxic American partisanship has become, with blame, of course, attached mostly to Republicans and conservatives. But the moaning supports the thrust of the title, if not the full metaphor.
The authors conclude that “the false information and political advertisements that the Russians are accused of spreading could ring true only to those already predisposed to suspect the worst.” People predisposed to believe the worst about...
This is also the view of New York Times writers Amanda Taub and Max Fisher. They express it in an article called “Russian Meddling Was a Drop in an Ocean of American-made Discord.”
Actually, the article is somewhat more wishy-washy than the title suggests. It consists mostly of the usual moaning about how toxic American partisanship has become, with blame, of course, attached mostly to Republicans and conservatives. But the moaning supports the thrust of the title, if not the full metaphor.
The authors conclude that “the false information and political advertisements that the Russians are accused of spreading could ring true only to those already predisposed to suspect the worst.” People predisposed to believe the worst about...
REPORT: Andrew McCabe Altered Peter Strzok’s 302 Notes on General Flynn interview – Then Destroyed Evidence
According to Mike, former Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Andrew McCabe altered far left FBI investigator Peter Strzok’s notes on his interview with General Michael Flynn.
And then McCabe destroyed the evidence.
This comes after Byron York reported that former FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Flynn did not lie under oath.
Then Flynn was indicted by the Mueller witch hunt months later for lying.
What changed?
According to Cernovich Andrew McCabe altered Strzok’s 302 reports — then destroyed the evidence.
In March he’ll retire with 1.8 million in pension, paid by us, the taxpayers.
He needs to be fired and put in prison, not nobly retired.
And then McCabe destroyed the evidence.
This comes after Byron York reported that former FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Flynn did not lie under oath.
Then Flynn was indicted by the Mueller witch hunt months later for lying.
What changed?
According to Cernovich Andrew McCabe altered Strzok’s 302 reports — then destroyed the evidence.
In March he’ll retire with 1.8 million in pension, paid by us, the taxpayers.
He needs to be fired and put in prison, not nobly retired.
Huge scoop. Like my other big stories (Susan Rice, security clearances, Conyers) will take media a long time to confirm.
You know how Peter Strzok's system didn't back up.
You know why?
McCabe altered his 302 of the Flynn interview, and deleted all history of revisions.
The FBI cannot provide a *clean* history of revisions for the 302 interview with General Flynn.
That's why Judge Emmett Sullivan, who is very tough on unethical prosecutors, had ordered the Special Counsel to disclose exculpatory evidence, which would include these revisions.
The IG knows McCabe changed Peter Strzok 302 / notes with General Flynn.
Yet issuing a report to this effect would call thousands of FBI investigations into question.
It's full on freak-out mode, as no one know how to spin this.
Why did a federal judge order Muller to disclose exculpatory evidence AFTER Flynn pled guilty?
Do you know how unusual this is? Flynn waived the right to exculpatory evidence in his plea deal.
That's because the 302 was altered, and everyone knows it.
Who is Judge Emmett Sullivan?
*This* is Judge Sullivan:
"A federal judge took the extraordinary step of naming a special prosecutor to investigate whether the government lawyers should themselves be prosecuted for criminal wrongdoing."http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/us/politics/08stevens.html …
"2 Prosecutors in Case of Senator Ted Stevens Are Suspended"
Who was the judge who demanded they be investigated - which almost never happens, as federal judges are boot lickers for DOJ?
The same judge assigned to Flynn's case. Judge Sullivan.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/25/us/politics/2-prosecutors-in-case-of-senator-ted-stevens-are-suspended.html …
How corrupt is Obama's DOJ?
They cleared the prosecutors who framed an innocent man.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/01/14/panel-clears-u-s-prosecutors-accused-of-botching-sen-ted-stevenss-corruption-trial/ …
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #172
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)