90 Miles From Tyranny

Friday, March 23, 2018

The Nobel Peace Prize Will Be Won If North Korea Gives Up Its Nukes....

Make No Mistake, The Nobel Peace Prize Is A Totally Corrupt Leftist Tool To Promote World Government.

The Nobel Peace Prize Is A Tool Of The Left..

The Nobel Peace Prize - Re Purposed...

The Nobel Peace Prize Is A Bad Joke.

BORDER PATROL FIGHTS BACK

The U.S. Border Patrol is reportedly fighting back against California’s openly seditious statewide sanctuary laws by refusing to hand over illegal aliens with felony warrants to police in California.

This makes perfect sense, according to the law of unintended consequences. It is an appropriate, tactically innovative way to counter California’s ridiculous laws that seek to nullify federal immigration legislation.

California now largely forbids cooperation with federal immigration authorities, a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause

Rodney Scott, the chief patrol agent in the Border Patrol’s San Diego sector, previously said that the Golden State’s sanctuary laws were making normal cooperation between his agency and local law enforcement difficult.

This is because California now largely forbids cooperation with federal immigration authorities, a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. State law there now imposes draconian restrictions on communication between local police and federal immigration enforcement, including information regarding when criminal aliens are scheduled to be released from local jails.

According to the Daily Caller, Scott recently entered into evidence a declaration in support of the U.S. Department of Justice’s lawsuit aimed at California’s reckless sanctuary state laws.

In the declaration Scott recounted several instances in which San Diego sector border agents determined that they could not hand over custody of a criminal alien to local law enforcement because local officials could not be trusted to return the alien to federal custody after processing by the courts.

According to the news report:

“In each instance, the Border Patrol Agent determined it was not appropriate, consistent with his or her federal responsibilities to ensure the enforcement of immigration law, to release a criminal alien to the state and local law enforcement,” Scott said in a court declaration. “This was because, although the alien was subject to removal, if released to California law enforcement, the alien would ultimately be released into the public.”

For years jailers in California and other liberal states have been refusing to honor detainer requests

So now Border Patrol agents, unlike California officials, are putting the public interest first. This effort aimed at the lawlessness of sanctuary jurisdictions is something that patriotic Americans should applaud.

For years jailers in California and other liberal states have been refusing to honor detainer requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs and Enforcement (ICE), often with disastrous results.

Felon and serial deportee Jose Inez Garcia Zarate killed Kate Steinle, 32, on July 1, 2015, after then-San Francisco sheriff Ross Mirkarimi (D), a wife-beating, driver license-suspended, gun permit-revoked, illegal alien-loving radical leftist ignored a detainer notice and put the Mexican national back on the streets.

Since Steinle’s untimely death, others have been killed by illegal aliens freed by detention centers that refused to respect ICE detainers, according to a long list compiled by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).

For example, in July 2016, Marilyn Pharis, 64, was raped, tortured, and murdered in her home in Santa Maria, Calif., allegedly by illegal alien Victor Aureliano Martinez Ramirez, a Mexican national, after a detainer was ignored and he was released from jail.

Two months later Danny Centeno-Miranda, 17, of Loudoun County, Va., was murdered by illegal alien Jose Espinosa De Dios, a citizen of Mexico, after the perpetrator was set free when a detainer was...

James Clapper’s allegedly false testimony to Congress regarding illegal media leaks by the intelligence agency he led during the Obama administration is only the first of what appears to be many layers of lies, coverups, and collusion among Deep State operatives like Clapper and various Establishment Media outlets. This includes, but is not limited to, an apparent pay-to-play scheme involving Mr. Clapper and CNN whereby Clapper illegally provided CNN with classified information and was then later rewarded with a CNN contributor contract following his tenure as head of the Obama NSA.

A Newsbusters report describes it with the following:

…“Clapper was actually the guy leaking information” to CNN about the presidential briefing on the Steele dossier that served as the pretext for the media feeding frenzy over possible Russian blackmail of Trump.

One can only laugh at the utter fraudulence of CNN: it pads its panels with government officials who leak to it, then presents them to its audience as “nonpartisan” experts commenting on the aftershocks of the very stories they leaked.

…Clapper denounced his own leak in a press release on January 11: “I expressed my profound dismay at the leaks that have been appearing in the press, and we both agreed that they are extremely corrosive and damaging to our national security.”

————–

So apparently the very thing Mr. Clapper described as ‘extremely corrosive and damaging to our national security’ (and highly illegal) was the very thing he was so repeatedly engaged in. To date, he hasn’t been punished. Just the opposite. Within months of resigning from his position at the NSA, James Clapper was getting paid a fat contributor contract by CNN – the news agency he is accused of leaking....

This week, YouTube entered the fight against gun rights by implementing new policies that ban highly-popular videos that are enjoyed by millions of gun owners, enthusiasts, and people eager to learn about firearms.

YouTube, which is owned by left-leaning Alphabet Inc.’s Google, will ban videos "that promote or link to websites selling firearms and accessories, including bump stocks, which allow a semi-automatic rifle to fire faster," Bloomberg reported.

YouTube has also started banning the accounts of major gun manufacturers like Spike's Tactical which received a notification from the tech giant that said they've been suspended because "YouTube doesn't allow content that encourages or promotes violent or dangerous acts that have an inherent risk of serious physical harm or death."

Spikes Tactical was also told that they are "prohibited from accessing, possessing or creating any other YouTube accounts."