Rush Limbaugh’s December 2018 “Limbaugh Letter” has an article titled “Demonizing White Men.” It highlights—with actual quotations from people in the media, academia, and the political and entertainment arenas—the attack on white men as a class.
You can decide whether these statements are decent, moral, or even sensible. Should we support their visions?
Don Lemon, a CNN anchorman, said, “We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them.”
Steven Clifford, former King Broadcasting CEO, said, “I will be leading a great movement to prohibit straight white males, who I believe supported Donald Trump by about 85 percent, from exercising the franchise [to vote], and I think that will save our democracy.”
Teen Vogue, a magazine targeting teenage girls, wrote, “Not only is white male terrorism as dangerous as Islamic extremism, but our collective safety rests in rooting out the source of their radicalization.”
Economist Paul Krugman, a New York Times columnist, wrote a column titled “The Angry White Male Caucus,” in which he explained, “Trumpism is all about the fear of losing traditional privilege.”
There have been similar despicable statements made by academics.
James Livingston, a Rutgers history professor: “OK, officially, I now hate white people. … I hereby resign from my race. F— these people.”
Stacey Patton, a Morgan State University professor: “There is nothing more dangerous in the United States than a white man who has expected to succeed and finds himself falling behind.”
Stony Brook University sociology professor Michael Kimmel explained, “White men’s anger comes from the potent fusion of two sentiments: entitlement and a sense of victimization.”
Then there’s the political arena.
Sen. Bernie Sanders: “There’s no question that in Georgia and in Florida racism has reared its ugly head. And you have candidates who ran against [Andrew] Gillum and ran against Stacey Abrams who were racist. … And that is an outrage.”
Michael Avenatti, criticizing the GOP senators during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings: “These old white men still don’t understand that assault victims and women deserve respect and to be heard.”
“What troubles me is … they’re all white men,” commented former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm regarding GOP senators questioning Christine Blasey Ford at the Kavanaugh hearings.
William Falk, editor-in-chief of The Week, said, “There’s something odd about the overwhelming white maleness of Washington’s current leadership.”
Not to be outdone, entertainers have hopped on the demonizing-white-men bandwagon.
Joy Behar, talking on ABC’s “The View” about senators supporting Kavanaugh, said: “These white men...
Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Wednesday, January 30, 2019
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #517
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Show Me On This Doll Where The MAGA Hat Hurt You...
Make No Mistake, Much Of The MAGA Hat Triggering Is An Attempt To Silence Dissent.
The Totalitarians Are Out In Full Force..
Someone is lying! Key DOJ officials’ testimonies contradict Democrats’ version of FBI Trump dossier story
New evidence regarding the infamous Russia dossier used by the FBI to obtain a warrant on President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign members suggests that somebody is lying. Worse, the liars could very well be the congressional Democrats who now control the House.
According to Democrats, notorious Justice Department official Bruce Ohr passed Christopher Steele’s bogus, discredited dossier on Trump to the FBI sometime after the 2016 presidential election.
But according to testimony by Ohr and his wife, Nelly, that’s been reviewed by Fox Newschief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge, it seems the dossier was handed to the bureau months earlier.
In a report published Monday evening, Herridge noted that according to congressional transcripts and email records, Steele met with Ohr and his wife on July 30, months before the election.
“My understanding was that Chris Steele was hoping that Bruce could put in a word with the FBI to follow-up in some way,” Ohr’s wife testified last year regarding the purpose of the meeting, adding that her husband spoke with Steele about “[Steele’s] suspicions that Russian Government figures were supporting the candidacy of Donald Trump.”
“In her testimony, Nellie Ohr also said that pieces of the unverified dossier – which later would be used to secure a surveillance warrant for Trump campaign aide Carter Page – may have been shared during the...
According to Democrats, notorious Justice Department official Bruce Ohr passed Christopher Steele’s bogus, discredited dossier on Trump to the FBI sometime after the 2016 presidential election.
But according to testimony by Ohr and his wife, Nelly, that’s been reviewed by Fox Newschief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge, it seems the dossier was handed to the bureau months earlier.
In a report published Monday evening, Herridge noted that according to congressional transcripts and email records, Steele met with Ohr and his wife on July 30, months before the election.
“My understanding was that Chris Steele was hoping that Bruce could put in a word with the FBI to follow-up in some way,” Ohr’s wife testified last year regarding the purpose of the meeting, adding that her husband spoke with Steele about “[Steele’s] suspicions that Russian Government figures were supporting the candidacy of Donald Trump.”
Congress to question most suspicious witness in Trump Dossier sham this week, behind closed doors https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/09/16/congress-to-question-most-suspicious-witness-in-trump-dossier-sham-this-week-behind-closed-doors-674836 …
See Wanda Rufin's other Tweets
“In her testimony, Nellie Ohr also said that pieces of the unverified dossier – which later would be used to secure a surveillance warrant for Trump campaign aide Carter Page – may have been shared during the...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)