90 Miles From Tyranny

Thursday, March 14, 2019

One Of The Seven Deadly Sins Is Now Chic?

Don't Go Where The Dumb Asses Tell Us To Go....

Free Speech In America?

Only if our leftist corporate masters allow it...

Melania Trump torches ‘The View’ for pushing inane ‘body double’ conspiracy in wake of tragedy

The First Lady fired back at The View for pushing the inane “Melania Trump body double” conspiracy theory.

First Lady Melania Trump slammed “The View” hosts for pushing the bizarre conspiracy theory that she used a body double during her weekend trip to visit Alabama tornado victims. The death toll from that tragedy has risen to 23 so far.

Melania’s rep, Stephanie Grisham, says the leftist mistreatment of conservative women is disgraceful. Grisham also called The View’s insensitivity toward the Alabama tornado victims “shameful.”

‘The View’: 23 People Dying In Tornado Is Hilarious

Grisham tweeted: “FLOTUS and POTUS traveled to Alabama to pay their respects and comfort victims of the tornado devastation. In typical fashion, The View chooses to laugh in the face of tragedy. Shameful.”

Trump Derangement Syndrome Is Getting Worse

Grisham added: “I’ve always found it sad that a group of women spend so much time attacking another woman, whose only goal is to help children. Yesterday’s show went beyond the petty, mean-girl spirit that we’ve grown accustomed to.”

President Trump also reacted on Twitter, saying leftists suffering from pathological Trump Derangement Syndrome “are only getting more deranged with time.”

The View Host: I Spent an Hour Thinking About This

On The View, Trump-hating leftists Joy Behar and Sunny Hostin (a former CNN contributor) bloviated that Melania must have used a body double over the weekend because she looked different to them.

Melania wore her usual oversized sunglasses and did not wear her signature high heels.

Behar bleated: “In that picture, it doesn’t look like her. It’s a different-shaped face.”

Hostin spouted: “I spent, like, an hour on Saturday involved in this. Melania is a very tall, statuesque woman and the one that we saw, she looks kind of short. Look how short she...

Greenpeace co-founder: Most scientists who say there’s a ‘climate crisis’ are on ‘government grants’

A co-founder of the environmental group Greenpeace slammed climate alarmists on Tuesday, claiming that most scientists who insist that the Earth is in human-caused climate “crisis” subsist on taxpayer funding and as such must take that position if they want their funding to continue.

Patrick Moore slammed climate alarmists for promoting a phony emergency during an interview Tuesday on “Fox & Friends.

“In fact, the whole climate crisis as they call it is not only fake news, it’s fake science. There is no climate crisis,” said Moore, author of the book Confessions of a Greenpeace Drop-Out: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist.

Moore attacked climate alarmists as doing nothing but “instilling fear” among Americans, especially young people, while protecting their taxpayer-funded ‘research’ fiefdoms.

“Most of the scientists who are saying it’s a crisis are on perpetual government grants,” Moore claimed.

“In fact, the whole climate crisis as they call it is not only fake news, it’s fake science. There is no climate crisis,” he said.

“There is weather and climate all around the world. And, in fact, carbon dioxide is the main building block of all life,” Moore added.

“That’s where the carbon comes from in carbon-based life, which is all life on land and in the sea. And not only that, a little bit of warming would not be a bad thing for myself, being a Canadian, and the people in Russia wouldn’t mind a little couple of degrees warmer either.”

But okay, is climate change real?

“Yes, of course, climate change is real,” he insisted. “It’s been happening since the beginning of time. But it’s not dangerous and it’s not made by...

President Donald Trump’s campaign was never given a defensive briefing by the FBI, despite mounting concerns that Russians were allegedly trying to penetrate the campaign during the 2016 presidential election.

In testimony provided by former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, along with others, it is the key finding that won’t bode well for the FBI and DOJ. It also raises significant questions regarding the treatment of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and whether she ever received ‘defensive briefings’ in detail from the bureau. Lynch’s testimony is still not public but has been reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

I WAS CERTAINLY AWARE THAT IT WAS AN OPTION, BUT I DON’T KNOW WHAT, IF ANYTHING, EVER HAPPENED TO THAT OPTION, SAID LYNCH

The defensive briefing, after all, is a procedure that is often given to presidential candidates, elected officials and even U.S. businesses that have either been unwittingly approached by foreign actors attempting to gain trust and befriend those in position of influence.

The briefing allows the government to protect the candidates, specifically if there is substantial information or knowledge to suggest that someone has targeted an unwitting American for information. If the FBI or intelligence agencies suspect foreign adversaries may be trying to penetrate a presidential campaign, as those FBI and DOJ sources suggested in testimony to lawmakers, it would then be required to warn those affected, a senior former intelligence official told SaraACarter.com.

Why? Because foreign adversaries like China and Russia for example, and even allies, will attempt to glean information – or favor – from unwitting persons with access to senior level officials. The access can assist those nation’s own national interest or provide access for intelligence collection.

In the case of Trump, the FBI gave only a general counterintelligence briefing but did not provide information to the campaign that the FBI believed there were specific counterintelligence threats. For example, the FBI’s concern over campaign advisors George Papadopolous, Carter Page and then concerns over former national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

“It is an essential task of the FBI and the intelligence community to give a defensive briefing to a presidential candidate when a foreign adversary is attempting to penetrate or make contact with someone in the campaign,” said a former senior intelligence official. “If the FBI and DOJ were so concerned about Carter Page and (George) Papadopolous why didn’t they brief Trump when he became a candidate? The fact that they didn’t is very revealing. If they gave defensive briefing to the Clinton campaign then I think we have the...