Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Sunday, October 6, 2019
Thinking About Electing A Democrat?
One small little right protects you from their Tyranny, and that is why they want to take it away from you.
French pro-immigration activist murdered by migrant
The parquet of Bobigny, near Paris, opened a murder investigation after the discovery of the dead body of a young woman, last Monday in Saint-Ouen (Seine-Saint-Denis). She was pro-immigration activist.
The victim, aged 27, was a medical intern in a departmental hospital, according to Agence France Presse. Her body had several stab wounds. She was found on Monday, shortly after 4pm, at her home. The door was ajar and traces of blood were found in her room.
An autopsy was performed on Tuesday and the investigation was entrusted to the judicial police of Seine-Saint-Denis, confirmed the police.
A 32-year-old man, a migrant, was indicted for murder and detained on Thursday, AFP was told by the prosecutor’s office in Bobigny.
The alleged perpetrator, living “in an irregular situation” in France, was born in Sudan and was arrested on Tuesday in Paris, according to a source close to the investigation.
Le Figaro reported that suspect was the ex-companion of the young woman of 27 years. The investigators soon focused on the ex-companion, the man of Sudanese origin, because he is already known for acts of violence.
The Bobigny prosecutor’s office and the judicial police of Seine-Saint-Denis is leading the investigation. Witnesses described him “as a man of foreign origin in his thirties, who looks rather marginal” French daily Le Parisien reported.
Audrey Coignard, 27, who was stabbed on Monday, September 16, 2019 in Saint-Ouen near Paris, was originally from...
The victim, aged 27, was a medical intern in a departmental hospital, according to Agence France Presse. Her body had several stab wounds. She was found on Monday, shortly after 4pm, at her home. The door was ajar and traces of blood were found in her room.
An autopsy was performed on Tuesday and the investigation was entrusted to the judicial police of Seine-Saint-Denis, confirmed the police.
A 32-year-old man, a migrant, was indicted for murder and detained on Thursday, AFP was told by the prosecutor’s office in Bobigny.
The alleged perpetrator, living “in an irregular situation” in France, was born in Sudan and was arrested on Tuesday in Paris, according to a source close to the investigation.
Le Figaro reported that suspect was the ex-companion of the young woman of 27 years. The investigators soon focused on the ex-companion, the man of Sudanese origin, because he is already known for acts of violence.
The Bobigny prosecutor’s office and the judicial police of Seine-Saint-Denis is leading the investigation. Witnesses described him “as a man of foreign origin in his thirties, who looks rather marginal” French daily Le Parisien reported.
Audrey Coignard, 27, who was stabbed on Monday, September 16, 2019 in Saint-Ouen near Paris, was originally from...
When You Are Terribly Frightened But Have No Concept Of Self...
This is an epic battle of historical consequences. If Trump wins, U.S. Government gets cleaned up in a most disruptive way and the media is once again outed for being liars and leftist operatives. If the Deep State wins, it is violent revolution or a slow, moribund death.
Elizabeth Warren Said She Was Pushed Out Of Teaching Job For Being ‘Visibly Pregnant’ — But She Told A Different Story In 2007
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren has repeatedly claimed on the presidential campaign trail that she was pushed out of her job as a special needs teacher after one year because she was “visibly pregnant” — but she told a different story in 2007.
The Democratic senator today portrays herself as a victim of discrimination; however, in 2007 she linked her departure to lacking proper credentials for a permanent teaching position.
Warren said during a September presidential debate that she “made it as a special needs teacher. … But at the end of that first year, I was visibly pregnant. And back in the day, that meant that the principal said to me — wished me luck and hired someone else for the job.”
Warren gave a different explanation for why she lasted one year as a special needs teacher in a 2007 interview at the University of California at Berkeley.
“I did that for a year, and then that summer I didn’t have the education courses, so I was on an ’emergency certificate,’ it was called. I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, ‘I don’t think this is going to work out for me,'” she recounted at the time.
“I was pregnant with my first baby, so I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and I was really casting about, thinking, ‘What am I going to do?’ My husband’s view of it was, ‘Stay home. We have children. We’ll have more children. You’ll love this.’ And I was very...
No Kidding: ‘Joker’ Is a Madman’s Indictment of Life
Even before its release, a tempest of arguments have surrounded “Joker.” Would the movie cause violence by glorifying the story of how an everyman became a killer and Batman’s greatest nemesis?
On one side, some psychologists argue that the movie’s character study will educate society about mental illness.
Writing for Psychology Today, neuroscientist Bobby Azarian says the comic book character Arthur Fleck turns into a killer and villain called the Joker only “after he is bullied, beaten, and humiliated by others.”
Writing for Deseret News, professor of pop culture Kendall Phillips disagrees: “Once you start getting into the head of, you know, the sociopath, the anti-social person, the revolutionary, that’s when we suddenly think that this image of violence can be inspiring to the wrong kind of people.”
Both these views agree on a central point: “Joker” represents the world as someone who commits a mass shooting might see it.
The storyline differs from previous films in the Batman canon because it paints the universe–at least the DC Comics universe–with the leprous white of the clown’s makeup.
The R-rated movie’s first principle is that nothing good can ever happen to Arthur Fleck, brilliantly played by Joaquin Phoenix. As Fleck attempts to brighten people’s lives as a clown, everyone responds with wooden-cutout rejection.
If he teases a kid, the mom angrily tells him to leave. If he performs on the street, every passerby makes snide remarks to him in a rough New York accent. “’Ey, Clown, you ain’t even that funny! Haw, haw, haw! How’s that?”
Fleck gets mugged and his boss won’t believe him or notice the Jackson Pollock painting of bruises covering his body. TV comedians make fun of him.
If there had been a scene with a pet shop, all the puppies would bite his fingers with all the cruelty in their pint-sized hearts. The list goes on.
No one in Gotham City, from affluent swells to street thugs, has anything better to do than beat up Fleck.
It’s the same monomaniacal lie all lunatics tell themselves, that the whole world lives only to spite them and never does anything else.
Director Todd Phillips presents this vision of the world in its entirety without an iota of criticism
In Fleck’s deterministic march into murder, we see how little Phillips believes in individual agency and choice. Fleck’s not responsible, it’s all the world’s fault. He doesn’t even ask for his own gun; he’s given one by a friend who wants him to be safe from muggers.
The scene nods stupidly to gun control, too, with Fleck attempting to reject the gun because he is mentally ill and it’s against the law.
“If only the Joker hadn’t been given a gun,” pundits will sigh. “His ravening malice against the entire world would never have been let loose without the friend-with-a-suspicious-brown-paper-bag loophole.”
In the whole “Joker” movie, poised to break box office records over its opening weekend, Fleck receives just one choice: Will he destroy the world by...
REPORT: Pelosi Considering Pulling Plug On Impeachment Dumpster Fire?
Democrats are a failed political without any ideas or agenda beyond their ongoing hatred of President Trump and his remarkably successful America-First agenda.
Now, the party and its floundering leadership are looking at a rising tide of support for the president as more and more details emerge about what appears to have been a badly botched attempt to use impeachment for nothing more than shameless political gain. From Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff being caught lying multiple times to a so-called “whistleblower” exposed as a CIA Deep State operative, the entire thing has been an embarrassing sham for Democrats that threatens to further weaken and destabilize the party from all sides.
Via Fox News:
Another day, another scandal that’s sure to trigger the Trump administration’s downfall—if only the American people would be less picky about what the definition of the word “evidence” is.
The Ukraine Call Transcript. The Whistleblower Complaint. The Impeachment Inquiry. The pieces of this latest impeachment jigsaw have reached mythic status, bolstered by frenzied reporting, and insistence on the part of Democrats and advocates that this time, they’ve got the president right where they want him.
Even before we saw the transcript of President Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Democrats and their friends in the media were already imploring the American people to accept as fact that the president had betrayed the nation’s trust by asking for foreign help in undermining the 2020 elections.
After the White House released the declassified transcript, the game changed. (It was a swift move by President Trump that caught Democrats flat-footed and blew a MAGA-sized hole through their far-left narrative that the president had done something wrong by trying to get to the bottom of what is now widely agreed to be potentially very serious Obama-era corruption on a global scale.)
Realizing there was no illicit request—and thus, no grounds for impeachment—leftists quickly turned their focus toward the intelligence community’s “whistleblower.”
It should have been an easy win. The anonymous employee’s detailed complaint suggested that the contents of the transcript had triggered alarm within the intelligence community.
Unfortunately for the pro-impeachment crowd, the American people remained skeptical that the transcript revealed more than run-of-the-mill diplomacy. The narrative foundered, and the chess pieces moved once more. This time, the smoking gun was guaranteed to be found buried deep within a national security server housing call records with foreign leaders.
If you can’t impeach for the crime, goes their argument, impeach for the cover-up!
What will happen, you ask, when this new revelation inevitably fizzles out? Democrats and their friends in the media will haul the goalposts down to...
Is Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Compromised?
He changed his mind on this last minute.
Approved Obamacare as a tax last minute.
Whenever the Left needs a win, he gives it to them...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)