Check It Out On Bitchute!
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
Monday, July 27, 2020
Blogs With Rule 5 Links
These Blogs Provide Links To Rule 5 Sites:
The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Kate Upton To The Edge Of Madness
Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around
The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style
EBL has: Rule 5 And FMJRA
The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama
The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup
The Narrative That Is Burning Our Cities Is A Lie.
We Have Closed Businesses And Mandated That People Stay Locked In Their Homes, But Championed Marxist Rioters That Burn Our Cities, Tear Down Our Monuments And Burn Our Flag?
If you climb on top of and beat an innocent stranger's car, you're a violent criminal who deserves prison
Not even the nicest parts of the American city is safe. The riots have come to Georgetown, the picturesque enclave of some of D.C.'s most decadent denizens, on par with Brentwood or the Upper West Side.
According to the organizing group, Saturday night's Totally Peaceful Protest was predicated on criminal behavior. The rioters planned on obstructing Georgetown traffic, a feat explicitly forbidden by D.C. law, while engaging in a "noise pollution" campaign. Because George Floyd, or something.
That the rioters could have obstructed emergency vehicles was bad enough, but soon the demonstration escalated as rioters climbed on top of and beat the car of a woman who, according to one of the rioters, had simply tried to avoid the riots by driving through a gas station.
Apparently, this needs to be said, but there is no "Karen" in this situation. There is an innocent victim who initially tried to avoid the riots and then tried to escape them as peacefully as possible, and then there are violent criminals who deserve prison time.
It goes without saying, but this is getting out of control. The violence isn't just in CHAZ or on the footsteps of a Portland federal court. It's slowly percolating across entire cityscapes, and unless these criminals are treated as such, there is zero incentive for this to end.
It's time to throw the book at individual offenders instead of waiting until mobs grow to the point the cops resort to using tear gas. Nip these escalations in the bud, lest we become Seattle, where law enforcement is so restrained they're warning property and business owners that they can no longer...
Why Marxist Organizations Like BLM Seek to Dismantle the "Western Nuclear Family"
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.
This idea isn’t unique to BLM, of course. “Disrupting” the “nuclear family” is a commonly stated goal among Maxist organizations. Given that BLM’s founders have specifically claimed to be “trained Marxists,” we should not be surprised that the organization's leadership has embraced a Marxian view of the family.
But where does this hostility toward the family originate? Partly, it comes from the theories of Marx and Engels themselves, and their views that an earlier, matriarchal version of the family rejected private property as an organizing principle of society. It was only later that this older tribal model of the family gave way to the modern “patriarchal” family, which promotes and sustains private property.
Clearly, in the Marxian view, this “new” type of family must be opposed, since the destruction of this family model will make it easier to abolish private property as well.
Early Family Units in Tribal Life
Frederick Engels’s 1884 book The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State provides a historical perspective of the Marxian view of the development of the modern Western family unit and its relation to property rights. (Engels, of course, was the longtime benefactor of and collaborator with Marx.)
In reconstructing the origins of the family within a Marxian framework, Engels traces back to the “savage” primeval stage of humanity that, according to his research, revealed a condition in which “unrestricted sexual intercourse existed within a tribe, so that every woman belonged to every man, and vice versa.”
Under such conditions, Engels explained, “it is uncertain who is the father of the child, but certain, who is its mother.” Only female lineage could be acknowledged. “[B]eing the only well known parents of younger generations,” Engels explained, women as mothers “received a high tribute of respect and deference, amounting to a complete women’s rule [gynaicocracy].”
Furthermore, Engels wrote, tribes were subdivided into smaller groups called “gentes,” a primitive form of an extended family of sorts.
These gens were consanguineous (i.e., included people descended from the same ancestor) on the mother’s side, within which intermarrying was strictly forbidden. “The men of certain ‘gens,’ therefore, could choose their wives within the tribe, and did so as a rule, but had to choose them outside of their ‘gens,’” Engels explained. And “marriage” at this stage was a “communal” affair, meaning that multiple partnerships between men and women was closer to...
There Is A Different Standard Of Justice For Democrats In America...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)