Monday, August 17, 2020
Property Destruction Is Not Freedom Of Speech, what you call freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.
Your Future Is Fucked, Your Career Options Are Limited. Idiot.
ANTIFA Thug That Attacked Portland Man in Cheap Shot Head Kick Identified as 25-Year Old “Armed Security Guard” Marquise Love
Big League Politics can now confirm the perpetrator of a brutal ANTIFA curb stomp attack on a badly beaten motorist in Portland as 29-year old Beaverton, Oregon native Marquise Love. Nationalist Review first published information pertaining to his identity early Monday morning.
Love brutally attacked a motorist with a cheap shot kick to the back of the head.
On his Facebook profile, Love identifies his employment status as “Armed Security Guard.” Internet sleuths watching video of the Portland riots caught imagery of an identification tab Love was wearing, and found his name.
Love is seen promoting the Black Lives Matter movement in additional Facebook posts.
Love has been previously arrested and booked into the Washington County Jail on charges of domestic assault, raising serious questions as to how he’s able to work as an armed security guard.
Love was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence charges in 2017. Oregon forbids offenders convicted of certain domestic violence crimes from possessing firearms, meaning that Love is likely a prohibited possessor of guns if he was ultimately convicted of the charges and is carrying firearms as an “armed security guard.”
Love would even go on to laughably claim that he was “protecting people” by delivering a cheap shot head kick to an incapacitated man, tacitly admitting his role in the incident.
Police were nowhere to be seen as Love and a mob of ANTIFA militants savagely beat the driver of the white truck. It remains to be seen if he’ll...
‘Spygate’ figure Stefan Halper wanted to be Trump’s secretary of state, recording suggests
The revelation was made by former State Department official Steven Schrage on Sunday, who shared a recorded conversation he claims was between himself and Halper on Jan. 10, 2017, showing the FBI informant hoped to join the highest levels of the Trump administration after Trump’s surprise victory over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Schrage, who claims to have spoken with U.S. Attorney John Durham in his inquiry of the Russia investigation and who has broken his yearslong silence during back-to-back interviews with Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures on Fox News, also said Halper later told him that the professor had been offered the ambassadorship to the Philippines under Trump.
“But you have no desire to go back in, unless there’s something, there’s nothing that would appeal to
you?” Schrage said during the purported January 2017 discussion, which he told Bartiromo he was recording as part of his Ph.D. dissertation discussions with the Cambridge professor.
“They’ve already given it away," Halper said. "They’ve already given it away: secretary of state.”
Schrage then asked if that would be Halper’s “dream job.”
“Um, it be a good job to have. I’d enjoy it, yeah,” Halper said. “I would be happy with deputy [secretary of state], as well.”
A report on the FBI's Russia investigation released by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz in December said the bureau concealed significant information provided by Halper, a confidential human source who was dubbed "Source 2." Halper, 75, a Virginia resident and Cambridge professor, worked as an FBI informant in 2016 and recorded discussions with at least three Trump 2016 campaign members: campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos, campaign associate Carter Page, and campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis. While Halper worked for the FBI, he received thousands of dollars from the Pentagon ostensibly for academic research.
When Halper’s role as an FBI informant was leaked to the media in May 2018, it led to accusations from Trump and Republicans that the Obama administration used Halper as part of an illegal effort to spy on the Trump campaign, dubbed “Spygate” and later “Obamagate” by allies of the president. The recorded...
7 Big Stories Corporate Media Is Ignoring Because The Truth Might Help Trump
Due to corporate media’s hatred of Donald Trump, Americans are sorely uninformed about news stories that, under any other presidency, would deservedly flood coverage.
When Donald Trump entered the political arena some five years ago, reporters floundered for a way to cover his candidacy. Then, sensing a ratings boom from the chaos the businessman and former reality TV star injected into the primary, the left-leaning press quickly converted to covering all things Trump, benefitting both their bottom line and their sense of schadenfreude.
Following Trump’s surprise election in 2016, the press faced a different challenge: How to cover a president they despised? Unfortunately, their answer was to abandon any semblance of journalistic integrity. They pushed fake news while ignoring huge stories that might accrue to Trump’s benefit. As a result, Americans are sorely uninformed about news stories which, at any other time and under any other presidency, would deservedly flood airways and the print media.
Here are seven important stories from just the last year that the press should have—and would have—covered in detail, or differently, but for their disdain for Trump.
1. Spygate
While the Spygate scandal spans many years, some of the most newsworthy developments broke over the last several months, although you would not know it if you read corporate media. Just Friday, the Department of Justice released information charging Kevin Clinesmith with making a false statement in an email he altered concerning Carter Page. Clinesmith inserted “was not a source” in the email addressing Page’s relationship with intelligence agency, and that false statement led to a fourth FISA surveillance order on Page.
Now, the MSM did “cover” this story, if you count the spin peddled as news coverage. After telling readers “Ex-F.B.I. Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Review of Russia Inquiry,” The New York Times twisted the story to slam Trump, sub-heading its article, “Prosecutors did not reveal any evidence of the kind of broad anti-Trump conspiracy among law enforcement officials that the president has long alleged.” The Times then hit Attorney General William Barr and defended the Robert Mueller investigation while minimizing Clinesmith’s misconduct.
Coverage of the charge against Clinesmith is already receding, but the story deserves relentless investigative reporting. Clinesmith was deeply involved in the Crossfire Hurricane surveillance of Trump, including in the FBI’s decision to...
"We Sick of Yo' White A*s!" Minnesota Dem Candidate Threatens Small-Town Americans During BLM Protest
John Thompson, who recently won the Democratic primary for the Minnesota House of Representatives District 67A, was filmed threatening a group of white teenage girls during an unhinged rant at a Black Lives Matter protest on Saturday in a suburb of Hugo, Minneapolis.
WATCH:
From AlphaNewsMN, "DFL candidate supported by Walz screams at teenaged girls during Bob Kroll protest":
A DFL-endorsed candidate for the Minnesota House screamed profanities at a group of teenaged girls during a protest Saturday outside the home of Bob Kroll in Hugo, Minnesota.
"I'm a black man being terrorized by this f–ing Klansman right here," shouted John Thompson, who won his primary Tuesday for House District 67A. "Y'all got the grand wizard living in your [vulgarity] neighborhood."
"Don't run now. Don't run now racist white people. I'm here. Oh yeah, we pull up. We pulled the f– up," Thompson continued. "Blue lives ain't s–, and if people here don't support black people, f– Hugo, Minnesota."
While he was shouting, Thompson was looking in the direction of a group of four to five teenaged girls who were standing on their front driveway and watching the demonstration. One of their acquaintances was apparently wearing a "blue lives matter" shirt, but had gone back inside.
Thompson was endorsed by the Minnesota DFL Party and Gov. Tim Walz in his campaign for...
CNN Poll: Biden Lead Shrinks on Convention Eve with Double-Digit Shift Trump’s Way
Presumptive Democrat presidential nominee former Vice President Joe Biden’s lead has evaporated in the past two months, a new poll from CNN shows.
Biden leads President Donald Trump by just four points nationally — 50 percent to 46 percent — and by even less across 15 battleground states that will determine who wins the electoral college. In those 15 states — Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wisconsin — the new CNN poll has Biden leading by just one percent, with Biden at 49 and Trump at 48.
The top line national number of a four-point race represents a double-digit shift in Trump’s direction from CNN’s last national poll in early June. That survey, two months ago, had Biden up 14 points — meaning this latest survey represents a ten-point swing Trump’s way as the summer has progressed heading into the conventions.
The Democrats begin their virtual convention, during which Biden and his running mate Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) will be formally nominated as the presidential and vice presidential candidates, this week. The Republicans hold their convention the following week.
In an article explaining the significant movement in Trump’s direction against Biden, CNN’s polling director Jennifer Agiesta wrote that the president has shored up several demographics that he was slipping in before.
“The movement in the poll among voters nationwide since June is concentrated among men (they split about evenly in June, but now 56% back Trump, 40% Biden), those between the ages of 35 and 64 (they tilt toward Trump now, but were Biden-leaning in June) and independents (in June, Biden held a 52% to 41% lead, but now it’s a near even 46% Biden to 45% Trump divide),” Agiesta wrote. “Trump has also solidified his partisans since June. While 8% of Republicans or Republican-leaning independents in June said they would back Biden, that figure now stands at just 4%. And the President has boosted his backing among conservatives from 76% to 85%.”
The poll was conducted from August 12 to August 15, meaning that it was done entirely in the wake of ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)