YouTube censors/deletes human rights videos on China’s genocide in Xinjiang

Uyghur People Demand Freedom with Flag of East Turkestan in front of the U.N.

YouTube removed several videos last week created by a human rights group featuring testimonies from people who say their families in China’s Xinjiang region have disappeared, according to a Reuters exclusive report. The platform claimed the videos violated their guidelines against “cyberbullying and harassment.”

Atajurt Kazakh Human Rights’ channel, co-founded by Xinjiang-born activist Serikzhan Bilash, has nearly 11,000 videos on YouTube attracting over 120 million views over the last four years. Thousands of the videos include individuals speaking on camera about relatives who have disappeared in the region.

According to Reuters, Bilash was told by government advisors to stop describing the situation in Xinjiang as a “genocide.”

“They’re just facts,” Bilash told the outlet in a phone interview. “The people giving the testimonies are talking about their loved ones.”

The group appealed YouTube’s decision to block their videos between April and June, and several were restored, but multiple videos are still...

Video: Spa Staff Dismiss Woman’s Complaint About Man Exposing his Penis to Little Girls in Female Area

“What sexual orientation? I see a dick.”

Staff at Wi Spa in Los Angeles dismissed a woman’s complaint that a man was exposing his penis to little girls in the women’s area by insisting that the individual had a right to be there due to his “sexual orientation.”

Yes, really.

A video clip shows the woman approaching reception staff and telling them, “I just wanna be clear with you – it’s OK for a man to go into the women’s section, show his penis around other women, young little girls underage – your spa Wi Spa condones that – is that what you’re saying?”

The staffer says the man is allowed to be there because of his “sexual orientation.”

“What sexual orientation? I see a dick, that lets me know he’s a man, he’s a man, he is not a female,” responds the woman.

“So Wi Spa is in agreement with men who just say they are a woman and they can go down there with their penis and get into the women’s section,” she added, asking if it was OK for women to go into the men’s section and expose their breasts.

Another woman then supports the individual who made the initial complaint before asking for a refund.

Another man then attempts to defend the man who exposed his penis, asking, “Are you talking about a transgender person?”

“There is no such thing as transgender – he has a dick,” the woman responds.

Another man then appears to tell her to “shut the fuck up.”

“As a woman I have a right to feel comfortable without a man exposing himself, OK?” she responds.

Other members of the spa then tell the woman to find a different spa, before the man continues to ask whether the individual in question is “a transgender person.”

As Matt Walsh highlights, the spa previously received a review from a woman who complained about a man who was in the women’s locker room with his penis exposed bragging about...

Morning Mistress

The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #699

Before You Click On The "Read More" Link, 

Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.  

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #1399

You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 

It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 

from the beautiful to the repugnant, 

from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 

you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 

You have been warned.

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

Girls With Guns

Blogs With Rule 5 Links

Tuesday is The New Monday!

The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Cottagecore Is The New Black

Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around

The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style

EBL has: Rule 5 And FMJRA

The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama

The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Are Milley Vanilli's Words His Or Is He Just A Mouthpiece For A Higher Authority?

Former Army Captain, Purple Heart Recipient Sean Parnell Rips Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark Milley For Defending CRT

Teen Vogue Has Nothing On Teen Pentagon!

Is Critical Race Theory Bad?

Ready For The Trains? 

How I Got Classified as an Anti-Government Domestic Extremist

When the United States says you are the most dangerous threat it faces, your life is about to change for the worse. The Biden Administration has just told conservative Americans they are that threat

The Biden Administration recently released its National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism. After reading the fact sheet, which was a bit disconcerting, I downloadedthe full National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism document. By the time I finished reading, I was shocked. Evidently, President Biden thinks I am an anti-government domestic extremist. But that’s not all. Almost all of my friends and most of the people in the small Southern community where I live are anti-government domestic extremists, too.

So, let’s unpack this “anti-government domestic extremist” business. An integral part of the National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism is an intelligence community assessment published in March. Having spent some time in the intelligence community, I was puzzled as to how agencies with the mission of foreign intelligence collection—and which are statutorily and explicitly restricted from conducting domestic intelligence operations—are now writing Intelligence Community Assessments on U.S. citizens residing on U.S. soil. Notwithstanding the troubling legal aspects, the assessment also lacked evidence to back up its broad assertions that America’s greatest threat comes from domestic extremists.

The strategy document claims to focus on unlawful violence from domestic extremists that pose a threat to public safety. The reality is there isn’t that much politically motivated domestic extremist violence happening in United States. Sure, there are countless FBI-manufactured plots and Homeland Security fever dreams of internet chatter to scare the public. But if one excludes Black Lives Matter and Antifa, actual political violence incidents, in a country of 330 million people, is a statistical anomaly. The extremely rare occurrences—thereport mentions six over a 26-year period (including a Black Lives Matter activist misidentified as an anti-government extremist—does not make a domestic terrorism pandemic.

Since our national security warriors need a domestic enemy, they have decided to focus on noncriminal (or, at best, pre-criminal) thoughts and intentions of that enemy. In other words, the national security apparatus plans to decide who will commit violence in the future, and then act against those individuals or groups to “disrupt” their plans.

I’d feel a little better about this idea if this same national security apparatus had not failed to connect the dots on everything from the fall of the Soviet Union to 9/11, the Boston Marathon bombers, and the ISIS Pulse nightclub attack—while simultaneously entrapping mentally challenged homeless people into fake terrorism plots designed, funded, and led by FBI agents and informants.

Like a scene out of “Minority Report,” the new focus on thought crimes, and the use of...

It Kind Of Makes You Wonder What Kind Of Conversations The Biden Administration Is Having In Smoke Filled Rooms....