Friday, July 2, 2021
Thursday, July 1, 2021
The United States Is Descending Into A Fascist, Socialist State Where There Is No Justice Just Political Prosecutions...
Liberals Didn't Pounce on Eric Adams Just for Questioning New York's Election. They Had...Another Reason.
New York’s descent into election madness would be hilarious if it wasn’t also so deeply disturbing. The Big Apple is looking like a giant banana republic. The move to ranked-choice voting means residents won’t have a result until mid-July, according to my colleague Rick Moran. Will they be able to trust that result when it comes so long after Election Day and the whole thing looks to be a giant mess?
From Election Day to whenever the result arrives, via a puff of smoke or whatever means they choose to announce it, chicanery and shenanigans are more than merely possible. There’s a lot at stake in this election; not least is the possible discrediting of Bill de Blasio and the entire “defund the police” project. Eric Adams, a former cop, ran on a law and order platform. By the end of Election Day, he looked to be cruising to a win. In deep blue New York City.
That’s no small thing.
Then all Hades broke loose when the city released a vote total that included 100,000 more votes than were cast on Election Day despite the fact that the absentee vote hadn’t been counted yet.
Adams raised his hand and questioned what was going on, as anyone might expect in the circumstances.
Another question this raises is, are the Democrats who run that city gaming the ranked-choice count to keep Adams out of Gracie Mansion?
His win could humiliate de Blasio. Yes, there’s some scuttlebutt in New York that de Blasio actually favors Adams. But, does that really seem likely? Mayor de Blasio didn’t endorse anyone, and he mocked the entire field. De Blasio surely knows that his endorsement, or even something tacit, would hurt whoever he supported, because he is deeply unpopular. Adams ran on undoing what de Blasio has done to the NYPD. All that has to be taken into account.
Plus, Adams is black.
Liberals never questioned Hillary Clinton or John Kerry when they alleged, without any evidence, that their elections were stolen from them. Both of them are white.
Just saying.
The left is living in dread fear of losing minority votes. That’s powering their divisive and nakedly racist policies now. They actually believe that undermining the entire American project and teaching us all to hate each other is their path to...
The latest example of ‘white privilege’: Eating French food
White privilege. White supremacy. White fragility. Whiteness. For the academic left, there’s no aspect of life which cannot be shoehorned into a relationship with these terms.
Law (yes, law) professor Mathilde Cohen of the University of Connecticut recently gave a talk at Sciences Po Paris and the University of Nanterre in which, according to The Times, she argued “French eating habits reinforced the ‘dominance’ of white people over ethnic minorities.”
“By this,” Cohen says in the clip below, “I mean the use of food to reinforce whiteness as a dominant racial identity.
“The French meal is often presented as the national ritual to which every citizen can participate equally. But French food ways are shaped by white middle- and upper-class norms … and the boundaries of whiteness are policed through daily food encounters.”
Cohen says a “strategy” by which non-whites in France try to “act white” is eating typical French food — like pork. With regards to her specialty (law), Cohen notes French schools are exempt from “having to accommodate dietary requests based on [students’] identity.” The “default” for schools are “white, Christian norms.”Cohen’s seminar was based on her academic paper “The Whiteness of French Food Law, Race, and Eating Culture in France.” The paper makes use of the concepts “food studies, critical race theory, and critical Whiteness studies,” and “sheds light” on the allegedly “neglected area” of food and race.
A snippet:
Judge blocks Florida 'Big Tech' law that would fine social media companies for banning politicians
A federal judge blocked a Florida law designed to penalize large social media companies that ban politicians over First Amendment concerns.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle granted a preliminary injunction against Gov. Ron DeSantis's "Big Tech" law after NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association, which represent multiple Big Tech companies, filed a lawsuit earlier in the month. The lawsuit argued the law violates the First Amendment's free speech clause, is vague in violation of the 14th Amendment, and stands in opposition to equal protection clauses.
“The plaintiffs are likely to prevail on the merits of their claim that these statutes violate the First Amendment,” Hinkle wrote. “There is nothing that could be severed and survive.”
NetChoice praised the ruling on Wednesday and said the motion protects "private businesses."
“We’re pleased the court ensured that social media can remain family friendly by delaying Florida’s law from taking effect on July 1," the group's president Steve DelBianco said in a statement. "This order protects private businesses against the State’s demand that social media carry user posts that are against their community standards. Even better, it lets social media provide high-quality services to their users while keeping them safe from the worst content posted by irresponsible users."
DeSantis, a Republican widely seen as a 2024 presidential contender, signed Florida's Big Tech Bill in late May alongside James O'Keefe, a conservative activist and founder of Project Veritas who was removed from Twitter earlier this year and later sued the platform over the ban.
It also came after the high-profile removal of former President Donald Trump from Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms in the aftermath of the U.S. Capitol riot in January.
The law, which was set to go into effect on Thursday, says the state can dole out penalties of $250,000 a day in fines for social media companies who chose to ban any state-level political candidates and $25,000 for local candidates. The law also forces social media giants to give users notice seven days before they are likely to be banned and give them a chance to...
Charles Schwab's SF HQ is up for sale after move to Texas
Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit the United States and companies and residents began fleeing San Francisco, Charles Schwab had already decided to move its headquarters to Texas.
Now, two years later, the financial services company's 17-story office building up for sale, as first reported by the San Francisco Business Times.
Charles Schwab still leases the entire building at 211 Main St. in SoMa, an agreement that runs through April 2028. The building was purchased by Blackstone Group in 2017 for approximately $313 million. The asking price is said to be about $400 million, according to the Business Times, which obtained a brochure that said that pricing is 25% below market rate.
While Westlake, Texas, will house the company's new main office, "Schwab was founded in San Francisco and has maintained a longstanding commitment to the Bay Area, which will continue. Schwab continues to hire in the Bay Area and expects to retain a sizable corporate footprint in the city," a company spokesperson told SFGATE.
Even if this sale can’t be blamed on the changing nature of work due to the pandemic, it’s a pattern that’s becoming common in San Francisco. After file-hosting service Dropbox announced a shift to permanent remote work in October 2020, it sold its Mission Bay headquarters — a four-building complex at 1800 Owens St. — for $1.08 billion in April. Tech companies with large office footprints like Salesforce and Twitter are also offloading office space...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)