90 Miles From Tyranny

Monday, March 7, 2022

Wisconsin's Voting Machines Were Connected To The Internet During The 2020 Election

Michael Gableman, Mark Zuckerberg, and Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein

Dominion and ES&S were online and a Democrat operative ran Green Bay's election from his Hyatt Regency hotel room.

Last August, Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos authorized the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), headed by retired state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, to investigate concerns about the 2020 election. Gableman delivered an interim report to the state assembly on November 10, 2021.

Last Tuesday, Gableman delivered a second interim report to the Wisconsin Assembly’s elections committee. Mr. Gableman wrote, “Ultimately, WEC’s directives mandated that widespread “election fraud” be undertaken in relation to the November 2020 election.”

Mr. Gableman vetted more than 90 nursing homes in five different counties before concluding there was “widespread election fraud at Wisconsin nursing homes in November of 2020.”

Mr. Gableman also found that $8.8 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. He wrote, “The record created by public document requests shows that CTCL, a private company headquartered in Chicago, engaged in an election bribery scheme.”

Zuckerberg’s CTCL grant money came with strings attached that created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican areas. Wisconsin’s five largest cities—Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay—were invited to take CTCL’s private money on the condition that they “increased in-person voting and absentee voting for targeted areas and groups”.

These groups met particular demographic criteria which, Gableman wrote, “matched that of the Biden-voter profile”.

Zuckerberg’s grant money also hired “CTCL’s partners for election administration”. A New York lawyer and Democrat political operative, Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein was listed as a “CTCL grant mentor” who directed election administration in Green Bay.

Mr. Rubenstein provided instructions to Central Count workers, developed absentee voting protocols, and set up a wireless network for Election Day operations in his Hyatt Regency hotel room.

The Special Counsel wrote, “At Mr. Spitzer Rubenstein’s instruction, there were three WiFi networks available. One was the general conference facility public network that would be available to members of the press and others. That network was password-protected, but the password was widely available. A second password-protected WiFi network was created for Central Count staff. Mr. Spitzer Rubenstein also directed that a third WiFi network be established, but that network was to be hidden and it was not to be password-protected. Spitzer Rubenstein also ensured that both networks reached his hotel room on the 8th floor.”

Two major machine manufacturers were identified in Wisconsin, Dominion Voting and ES&S. In regards to Dominion, Mr. Gableman wrote, “These specific machines can be manipulated to alter actual votes cast— either surreptitiously or by the machine technicians.” He continued:

Public Health Scotland have refused to publish further data on Covid deaths and hospitalizations by vaccination status going forward because the data has shown for the past few weeks that the fully vaccinated population are developing AIDS.

On the 26th Jan 22, The Expose exclusively told you how Public Health Scotland data showed fully vaccinated individuals were up to 4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated individuals.

The very next week, Public Health Scotland added a whole section on alleged vaccine effectiveness in their report as well as notes in red text stating the data should not be used to measure vaccine effectiveness.

Source

This was clearly done in response to our report, and because they could no longer use their own data, as they have done for the past year, to show that the Covid-19 injections are effective.

But now, as we quitely predicted, Public Health Scotland have gone one step further, and have announced in a recent report that they will no longer publish the number of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccine status.

The reasons they’ve given are laughable, because they felt no need to come up with these tedious excuses when the hospitalisation and death rates were shown to be in the vaccines favour.

But we can reveal that the real reason Public Health Scotland will no longer publish the data, is because it clearly shows that the fully vaccination population are developing Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

One of the main reasons given by Public Health Scotland that their data is now unreliable, is because “vaccine effectiveness wanes over time”. But this is a lie, because vaccine effectiveness doesn’t wane. Immune System Performance does.

Source

Vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

Vaccines allegedly help develop immunity by imitating an infection. Once the imitation infection induced by the vaccine goes away, the body is left with a supply of “memory” t-cells and antibodies that will remember how to fight that disease in the future.

So, when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weaken over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.

In regards to the Covid-19 injections –
A vaccine effectiveness of +50% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is 50% better at tackling Covid-19.
A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the fully vaccinated are no more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, meaning the vaccines are ineffective. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is equal to that of the unvaccinated at tackling Covid-19.
But a vaccine effectiveness of -50% would mean that the unvaccinated were 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the fully vaccinated. In other words the immune system performance of the vaccinated is 50% worse than the natural immune system performance of the unvaccinated. Therefore, the Covid-19 vaccines have damaged the immune system.

With that being said it should come as no surprise to anyone as to why Public Health Scotland no longer wish to publish the Covid-19 data by vaccination status, because it clearly shows in all areas that the Covid-19 injections are proving to have a negative vaccine effectiveness, and therefore a negative immune system performance, which implies the fully vaccinated are developing Covid-19 vaccine induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).

In table 13 of the latest Covid-19 Statistical Report published Wednesday 16th Feb 22, PHS provide the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status.

The table, found on page 37, shows that the triple vaccinated accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases between 15th Jan and 11th Feb, recording 13,833 cases in the week beginning 5th Feb alone.This compares to 5,201 cases among the double vaccinated, and 3,834 cases among the unvaccinated during the same week.

But the table also shows us the Covid-19 case rates per 100k population by vaccination status. We’ve extracted the data to produce the following chart –

Source Data

As you can see, Covid-19 case-rates have remained highest among the double vaccinated over the past four weeks. But something peculiar has also happened. The case rates among the not-vaccinated have declines week on week, but the case rates among the triple vaccinated have increased week on week, now almost matching the case rate among the double vaccinated by...

Before You Click On The "Read More" Link,

Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?

It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,

from the beautiful to the repugnant,

from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,

you could be inspired, you could be appalled.

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.

You have been warned.

Girls With Guns

Visage à trois #101

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:

Two Additional Bonus Videos: <Gore Warning>

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #277

Why Is CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Refusing to Answer this Senator’s Questions?

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) has taken a lead throughout the Covid-19 pandemic to hold public health officials and agencies accountable if they’ve failed to provide accurate and timely information to the public for whom they work.

From masks, vaccines, and school shutdowns, to the origination of Covid-19, Johnson has been asking critical questions. However, he says he has received very few answers.

According to Johnson, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky is one of the public health officials who has been non-compliant with his requests.

To date, Johnson says he has made eight specific requests, directly of Walensky, that have gone unanswered.

In his most recent attempt to get data, he writes:

“In the midst of a pandemic, it is unacceptable that CDC would withhold relevant data on Covid-19 that could inform the public and potentially save lives. Moreover, it is grossly arrogant that your agency has repeatedly ignored Congressional requests.”

Read Senator Johnson’s latest letter to Director Walensky below:

March 1, 2022

Rochelle P. Walensky, M.D., MPH Director
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Dear Director Walensky:

Over the last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has failed to be transparent to the American people and their elected representatives. Specifically, CDC has not responded to my multiple requests for information about COVID-19. In addition, CDC has reportedly “withheld information” about COVID-19 from the public that “could help state and local health officials better target their efforts to bring the virus under control.”1 In the midst of a pandemic, it is unacceptable that CDC would withhold relevant data on COVID-19 that could inform the public and potentially save lives. Moreover, it is grossly arrogant that your agency has repeatedly ignored Congressional requests.

To date, I have sent you numerous letters requesting information about COVID-19 including records and data on the virus, school guidance, and the vaccines. For the letters listed below, you have either failed to respond or your response was significantly incomplete:

May 19, 2021 – Requesting records relating to teachers’ unions and CDC guidance.
June 28, 2021 – Requesting information about COVID-19 vaccine adverse events.
July 13, 2021 – Requesting information on vaccine safety monitoring.
July 30, 2021 – Requesting data CDC used to create a slide deck on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.
August 22, 2021 – Regarding the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting.
September 15, 2021 – Requesting information on the effectiveness of natural immunity as protection from COVID-19.
October 5, 2021 – Requesting information on early treatments for COVID-19.
December 29, 2021 – Requesting information about vaccine lot variation data.1 Apoorva Mandavilli, The C.D.C. isn’t publishing large portions of the Covid data it collects, NY Times, Feb. 21, 2022.

Director Walensky March 1, 2022 Page 2

CDC’s failure to respond to Congress appears to be one piece of the agency’s larger problem with public transparency. According to the New York Times, during the “[t]wo full years into the pandemic, the [CDC] has published only a tiny fraction of the data it has collected.”2 The CDC’s apparent indifference toward transparency during a pandemic is disturbing and shameful.

Throughout the pandemic, CDC and other health agencies have promoted inconsistent policies and...