90 Miles From Tyranny

Monday, March 28, 2022

Biden approval to 34%, historic low faith in economy

A gold-standard pollster heralded by Democrats for her accuracy has just pulled the rug out from under the White House with the worst findings yet for President Joe Biden.

Ann Selzer, who conducts the famous Iowa Poll, working with Iowa’s Grinnell College, has found nationally that Biden’s approval rating has sunk to 34% and that most respondents believe the economy is also heading south.

“The latest edition of the Grinnell College National Poll (Grinnell-Selzer) shows that nearly 6 in 10 Americans believe the economy will get worse in the next 12 months — the highest number recorded in the history of the poll. And the pessimism about the future of the economy may be weighing down President Joe Biden’s approval ratings across the board,” said the poll analysis.

Overall, Biden’s approval rating is 34%, with 52% disapproving and 14% who don’t know.

“It’s interesting to me that the ‘not sure’ factor is as high as it is,” said Selzer of Selzer & Company. “It seems unlikely that Joe Biden isn’t well known enough to make a judgment. I believe this is a reflection of the high level of uncertainty everywhere – the war in Ukraine, inflation, COVID-19 and more,” she added.

Some in Washington today took note of her latest poll because of her accuracy in the past and presumably because it also recorded among the lowest approval ratings yet for the stumbling president.

Selzer has been called “the best pollster in politics” by influential polling media site FiveThirtyEight:

Visage à trois #145

Three Videos For Your Viewing Pleasure:

Three Additional Bonus Videos:

I met with a doctor who claims that the blood of every COVID vaccinated person all share an artifact that he's never seen before. The question is: what is that artifact?

I recently met with a functional medicine doctor. Among other things, functional medicine doctors have been known to use darkfield microscopes and live blood analysis which is shunned by the mainstream medical community as quackery.

OK, now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s get to what the slides show.

First off, using a microscope to look at blood is not an unreasonable thing to do. Using a darkfield microscope just provides additional contrast.

In my case, the doctor took a blood sample from me, put it on a glass slide, and covered it with a glass cover. We weren’t in his office so the sample dried out before he looked at it, but he said what he saw was consistent with what he’s observed in every COVID vaccinated patient he’s looked at.

Here is the first image he sent.

What’s odd are what I’m calling the “land masses.”

Note the two large “land masses” in the photo. These “land masses” (my terminology not his) are what he says he only sees in vaccinated patients. The circles are red blood cells and the “spikes” are just because they are flattened and dehydrated (since hours passed from the time he took the sample).

Here’s another slide of my blood. The lower left part (to the left of the dark diagonal “line”) is just an air bubble).

Again, we see a strange “land mass” here just above the line and below the blood cells. That is the area of concern.

Whatever this is, it’s unusual.

What’s troubling is that I was vaccinated 1 year ago and my blood is still easily distinguishable as “vaccinated” blood.

I talked to Ryan Cole and he’s not sure what it is either, but thinks that it is important to find out.

Does anyone think they know and can confirm it?

The last part is the most important.
The graphene oxide hypothesis

There are people who think the sheets are graphene oxide, but they haven’t proved it.

Some people think you can do the identification using mass spectroscopy, but other experts say that graphene oxide is just carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen so it isn’t going to be easily detectable.

However, there are clever ways we can look for graphene oxide in...

Quick Hits Of Wisdom, Knowledge And Snark #318

Political Blackmail Empowers the American Left

Among the more famous quotations by Mao Zedong is: “All political power comes from the barrel of the gun.” However, Mao got that wrong as in the United States circa 2022 political blackmail in the hands of progressives – really, American Marxists -- is a much more effective tool than the gun.

Less than seven percent of American voters identify as being “very liberal”. Yet, thanks to the unbridled use of political blackmail, they have set the agenda since 2009. Additionally, by virtue of these tactics they are also in de facto control not only of the Democrat party but the legacy media, the education establishment, social media, and the universities. In 2021 they achieved a major milestone: absolute dominion over the Office of President of the United States.

Vladimir Lenin, one of the icons of the American Marxists, defined modern political blackmail as follows:

Political blackmail is the threat of exposing, or the actual exposure, of true, but more often invented, “stories” with the aim of causing an opponent political damage, of slandering him, of depriving him of the possibility of engaging in political activity, or of making it difficult for him.

Lenin neglected to note that in the modern era successful political blackmail is wholly dependent on the blackmailer either controlling or being in league with a compliant national media. Further, there are both overt and subtle modes in American Marxist political blackmail.

After decades long stealth infiltration, by the late 1990’s a significant percentage of the legacy media was populated by the disciples of and apologists for the radical left. Following the guidelines set out by Lenin, the never-ending search for and fabrication of “stories” about their political opponents took on a new ferocity and determination unlike any other period in American history. In other words, the overt mode of political blackmail.

In a corollary to Lenin’s guidelines, any stories about the iniquities or malfeasance of their apologists or their acolytes were suppressed as a means of coercing these compatriots into promoting the Marxist/socialist agenda and, more importantly, from straying off the reservation. Thus, the subtle mode of political blackmail.

After the turn of the century a new tactic, thanks to a new technology, evolved with the same objective of destroying or marginalizing political opponents. The oblivious and propagandized foot soldiers and their mentors began using the massive reach of social media to not only regurgitate the invented “stories” in the legacy media but to blatantly and falsely accuse others of...

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., blocked the Senate’s swift passage of a bill to halt trade relations with Russia. He warned that language in it that could give presidents overly broad sanctioning authority under the Magnitsky Act.

He said the “original” version of the “Magnitsky Act allowed sanctions against people who committed specific human rights abuses such as torture, extrajudicial killing.”

“The new Magnitsky Act doesn’t define human rights abuses, and a president who argues abortion is a human right could allow sanctions against a person or country who denies abortion services,” Paul continued.

Paul warns it will give a U.S. president broader authority to sanction a person for human rights abuses under Magnitsky Act.

Paul wants a clarified definition to prevent US presidents from abusing the power, and you know Biden and future presidents will do exactly that.

It gives far too much power to President’s to sanction anyone, anywhere, for any reason.