Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Monday, July 11, 2022
Why spike protein?
I’m confused, and for many reasons. Stupidly, I asked myself why did all the scientists around the world pick the spike protein out of all the viral proteins to replicate using DNA/mRNA technology?
Detective work ensued.
Some scientists have said that the spike was chosen because it is the protein that binds to host cells, and thus it is the only part of the virus that can elicit "neutralising antibodies" that help prevent infection.
If you didn’t know, neutralising antibodies not only bind to a virus, they bind in a manner that blocks infection. Only a small subset of the many antibodies that bind a virus are capable of neutralisation.
And yes, the spike protein is capable of eliciting neutralising antibodies, and though I have researched this thoroughly, I could not find evidence of other parts of the virus having the ability to do the same thing. Remember that this doesn’t rule out the possibility that they can’t however. It just hasn’t been tested.
So spike was chosen to elicit neutralisation, okay, or as one paper puts it, “S glycoprotein is responsible for the entry of the virus into host cells, where it begins to spread, but it can also be recognized by the immune system triggering a protective response, the main objective of vaccines. Several types of new vaccines currently in use are selected based on their ability to generate neutralizing antibodies upon immunization.”.
This would be all well and good but as we know now, mRNA-vaccine-induced neutralising antibodies are highly variable among individuals. In other words… useless. This should have been tested thoroughly before mass introduction don’t you think?
Spike is also rapidly mutating and evades vaccine-induced antibodies with high efficiency. So again, useless.
And what makes this all so potentially sinister is that the spike protein is extremely toxic, regardless of what certain ‘fact checkers’ have said in the past.
Will these 'fact checkers' ever get prosecuted for spreading lies or what?
The spike protein is definitely toxic. We know it can cross the blood-brain barrier in mice and cause nerve damage. We know it can cause cardiac damage. We know it can cause lung inflammation. We know it can cause endothelial cell damage. We know it can significantly inhibit DNA damage repair.
You get the point. (Click on those hyperlinks if you don’t believe me)
Also remember that the COVID lab-leak hypothesis, the hypothesis regarding whether or not SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus emerged from a laboratory and was subsequently leaked, has not been disproven as of yet.
I bring this up because it has been found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (both the natural and mRNA kind) has GP120 (Panglolin HIV) and Staphylococcus Enterotoxin B (SEB) gene inserts.
That’s the human immunodeficiency virus HIV. One study, now withdrawn, noting the GP120 inserts states, “Taken together, our findings suggest unconventional evolution of 2019-nCoV that warrants further investigation.”. I ditto that.
And the symptoms of SEB intoxication is noted in one review titled ‘Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B as a Biological Weapon: Recognition, Management, and Surveillance of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin’, like the following,
“sudden onset of fever (40-41C), chills, headache, myalgia, non-productive cough. Some patients may develop shortness of breath and chest pain. Fever may last for 2-5 days and cough may continue for up to one month. Patients also present with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea when the toxin is swallowed.”.
Now, what does that sound like?
So I ask again, why spike protein?
Why not use other proteins, a weaker spike, or a...
Detective work ensued.
Some scientists have said that the spike was chosen because it is the protein that binds to host cells, and thus it is the only part of the virus that can elicit "neutralising antibodies" that help prevent infection.
If you didn’t know, neutralising antibodies not only bind to a virus, they bind in a manner that blocks infection. Only a small subset of the many antibodies that bind a virus are capable of neutralisation.
And yes, the spike protein is capable of eliciting neutralising antibodies, and though I have researched this thoroughly, I could not find evidence of other parts of the virus having the ability to do the same thing. Remember that this doesn’t rule out the possibility that they can’t however. It just hasn’t been tested.
So spike was chosen to elicit neutralisation, okay, or as one paper puts it, “S glycoprotein is responsible for the entry of the virus into host cells, where it begins to spread, but it can also be recognized by the immune system triggering a protective response, the main objective of vaccines. Several types of new vaccines currently in use are selected based on their ability to generate neutralizing antibodies upon immunization.”.
This would be all well and good but as we know now, mRNA-vaccine-induced neutralising antibodies are highly variable among individuals. In other words… useless. This should have been tested thoroughly before mass introduction don’t you think?
Spike is also rapidly mutating and evades vaccine-induced antibodies with high efficiency. So again, useless.
And what makes this all so potentially sinister is that the spike protein is extremely toxic, regardless of what certain ‘fact checkers’ have said in the past.
The spike protein is definitely toxic. We know it can cross the blood-brain barrier in mice and cause nerve damage. We know it can cause cardiac damage. We know it can cause lung inflammation. We know it can cause endothelial cell damage. We know it can significantly inhibit DNA damage repair.
You get the point. (Click on those hyperlinks if you don’t believe me)
Also remember that the COVID lab-leak hypothesis, the hypothesis regarding whether or not SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus emerged from a laboratory and was subsequently leaked, has not been disproven as of yet.
I bring this up because it has been found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (both the natural and mRNA kind) has GP120 (Panglolin HIV) and Staphylococcus Enterotoxin B (SEB) gene inserts.
That’s the human immunodeficiency virus HIV. One study, now withdrawn, noting the GP120 inserts states, “Taken together, our findings suggest unconventional evolution of 2019-nCoV that warrants further investigation.”. I ditto that.
And the symptoms of SEB intoxication is noted in one review titled ‘Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B as a Biological Weapon: Recognition, Management, and Surveillance of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin’, like the following,
“sudden onset of fever (40-41C), chills, headache, myalgia, non-productive cough. Some patients may develop shortness of breath and chest pain. Fever may last for 2-5 days and cough may continue for up to one month. Patients also present with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea when the toxin is swallowed.”.
Now, what does that sound like?
So I ask again, why spike protein?
Why not use other proteins, a weaker spike, or a...
The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1076
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #1776
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Sunday, July 10, 2022
Hunter Biden: Jill Biden Is a ‘Selfish Silly Entitled C*nt’
Hunter Biden lashed out at first lady Jill Biden in a 2018 text message to his romantic partner and late brother’s widow, calling her a “selfish silly entitled cunt.”
“Go f**k yourself,” Hunter said in mockery of Dr. Jill Biden’s acclaimed teaching prowess, the Sun reported Friday from the “laptop from hell.”
“I suooorted [supported] my GM family including some of the costs you should have used your salary to lay (pay) for – for the last 24 years,” Hunter said during the rant, admitting he is the intake for the family’s business deals.
Hunter continued to belittle Jill Biden as a grammar teacher that did not graduate from an Ivy League college.
“And you do know the drunkest I’ve ever been is still smarter than you could ever even comprehend and you’re a shut (sic) grammar teacher that wouldn’t survive one class in a ivy graduate program.”
It should be noted Jill Biden reportedly prefers to be called a doctor, though she only obtained her Ed.D., a doctor of education degree.
“So go f**k yourself Jill let’s all agree I don’t like you anymore than you like me,” he added.
Though Hunter has said unkind words about Jill Biden, the first lady was seen in public with Hunter on Independence Day watching the fireworks at Fort McNair.
Jill Biden has also taken it on herself to hang Hunter’s artwork in her White House office amid a family scheme to sell the works to “anonymous” investors for up to $500,000, the New York Times revealed in August. The White House has...
“Go f**k yourself,” Hunter said in mockery of Dr. Jill Biden’s acclaimed teaching prowess, the Sun reported Friday from the “laptop from hell.”
“I suooorted [supported] my GM family including some of the costs you should have used your salary to lay (pay) for – for the last 24 years,” Hunter said during the rant, admitting he is the intake for the family’s business deals.
Hunter continued to belittle Jill Biden as a grammar teacher that did not graduate from an Ivy League college.
“And you do know the drunkest I’ve ever been is still smarter than you could ever even comprehend and you’re a shut (sic) grammar teacher that wouldn’t survive one class in a ivy graduate program.”
It should be noted Jill Biden reportedly prefers to be called a doctor, though she only obtained her Ed.D., a doctor of education degree.
“So go f**k yourself Jill let’s all agree I don’t like you anymore than you like me,” he added.
Though Hunter has said unkind words about Jill Biden, the first lady was seen in public with Hunter on Independence Day watching the fireworks at Fort McNair.
Jill Biden has also taken it on herself to hang Hunter’s artwork in her White House office amid a family scheme to sell the works to “anonymous” investors for up to $500,000, the New York Times revealed in August. The White House has...
Russian lawmaker threatens to ‘take back’ Alaska
A Russian lawmaker threatened this week that Russia could reclaim Alaska from the U.S. if the U.S. continues to impose sanctions and seize assets from Russians.
Vyacheslav Volodin, the chairman of the Russian State Duma — the lower house of Russia’s parliament — spoke on Wednesday before the Russian parliament’s summer recess. During his speech, Volodin appeared to threaten a response to U.S. sanctions efforts and asset seizures, which have taken control of the bank assets, yachts, private planes and luxury apartments of wealthy Russian businessmen abroad.
“Decency is not a weakness we always have,” Volodin said. “To answer America, let it always remember there’s a piece of territory, Alaska. When they try to manage our resources abroad, let them think before they act that we, too, have something to take back.”
According to the Moscow Times, Volodin also noted deputy State Duma Chairman Pyotr Tolstoy had proposed holding a referendum among Alaskans to consider joining Russia.
“We don’t interfere in their domestic affairs,” Volodin responded, reportedly holding back laughter as he addressed fellow lawmakers.
Russian settlers, and particularly fur traders, first began to arrive in Alaska in the 1700s. The then-Russian Empire under Tsar Alexander II facilitated the sale of Russia’s Alaskan territorial holdings to the U.S. through the Alaska Purchase of 1867. The Alaskan territory was purchased for about $7.2 million in 1867, a value of about $140 million today.
Vyacheslav Volodin, the chairman of the Russian State Duma — the lower house of Russia’s parliament — spoke on Wednesday before the Russian parliament’s summer recess. During his speech, Volodin appeared to threaten a response to U.S. sanctions efforts and asset seizures, which have taken control of the bank assets, yachts, private planes and luxury apartments of wealthy Russian businessmen abroad.
“Decency is not a weakness we always have,” Volodin said. “To answer America, let it always remember there’s a piece of territory, Alaska. When they try to manage our resources abroad, let them think before they act that we, too, have something to take back.”
According to the Moscow Times, Volodin also noted deputy State Duma Chairman Pyotr Tolstoy had proposed holding a referendum among Alaskans to consider joining Russia.
“We don’t interfere in their domestic affairs,” Volodin responded, reportedly holding back laughter as he addressed fellow lawmakers.
Russian settlers, and particularly fur traders, first began to arrive in Alaska in the 1700s. The then-Russian Empire under Tsar Alexander II facilitated the sale of Russia’s Alaskan territorial holdings to the U.S. through the Alaska Purchase of 1867. The Alaskan territory was purchased for about $7.2 million in 1867, a value of about $140 million today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)