Three Additional Bonus Videos:
Tuesday, September 26, 2023
Sustainable’ Is The New Code Word For Genocide
The trouble with writing about Genocide before it actually happens is that you sound tin foil hat crazy, so I went looking for other people who understand and can see patterns. I found English writer Karen Harradine, and US writer Naomi Wolf, and no doubt there are others, not yet found. I am reminded of the US press agents in Berlin, warning their Jewish friends to get out because of the Nazis in the 1920s, a warning few of them acted on. I came to know about this, because my childhood next-door neighbours were German Jews, their father had listened to the warning and got his family out to Australia early enough. In talking to Karen Harradine, I know it is a great frustration that so many people are so clueless, zombie-like they live their lives.
Naomi Wolf sums it up well in a recent article, “The problem with history is that it has not happened before in just that way. Meaning, just before people were put into boxcars and murdered, you would have sounded crazy if you had said, I am afraid people will be put into boxcars and murdered. Before the English set up inadequate “soup kitchens” with “vile soup” that made the dysentery of a targeted population worse, and hastened their departure from the land or hastened their death, you would have sounded crazy if you had said, I am afraid the British government will subvert the “feeding programs” they are deploying in Ireland, in order to get troublesome tenants off of the land. Before smallpox was used as a bioweapon in an effort to depopulate Native American tribes, in a way that could serve to “Extirpate this Execreble.”
Another thing I have noticed is just how many stock market analysis and traders are starting to connect the Genocide dots, perhaps because it is an important skill of operating successfully in markets, looking at probabilities, trends, and market or situational structure.
So once more in history a few of us are screaming of pending Genocide, to a world that is mostly deaf, actually worse than deaf. Dismissive with the ignorant reframe, people have actually been taught by the media and the Globalist Fascists, “It’s a conspiracy theory” usually accompanied by a slight chuckle which is meant on one hand to put the person giving the warning down, but also holds just a slight nervous twinge that the person providing the warning may be correct. These people do not even understand that they have been taught the, “conspiracy theory”, reply, They are robots, it was a reframe and cover up invented by the US CIA in the 1960s.
The Globalists and their Malthusian, Flying Monkey Greens are anti-human, anti-God, they want to reduce the Global population down from 7 billion people, to 1 billion people. Through a range of methods much of which they have already put in train. To see the future all you need do now is follow the trend to an obvious conclusion.
Nazi pattern recognition
In order to understand the threat, it helps to be familiar with the pattern of the early Nazis, especially as so many of the Globalist Fascists have Nazi backgrounds, See The New Nazis are on the march and because both the Nazis and Globalist Fascists at a glance appear to be acting “For the Greater Good.” The early Nazis did not come out and say, “Our plan is to gas to death 10 million people in the next decade, and start a war where 60 million people will die.
If they had done that, Hitler would not have achieved 97% support of the German people in the 1920s. Instead they came off as the saviour of Germany, then they emphasised that they were the Master Race, then they created division, the Master Race and the threat of the Jews, then dehumanisation See The dehumanisation of the Other the Nazis commonly stated, “Jews spread disease.” According to the Nazis it was pure blood Nazis against disease spreading Jews. This justified in the evil Nazi mind the reason for herding the Jews into Ghettos and then into concentration camps and then murder in the millions. They didn’t call it murder or genocide. They called it, “The Final Solution.” Everyone in the Nazi Club knew what the “Final Solution,” actually meant.
Like the word, “Sustainability,” today actually means getting the world population down to a level the Fascists think is sustainable. Or to be blunt, killing billions of people who are not in the Globalist Fascist Club.
The Globalist Fascists. like the Nazis have their, them and us, calling themselves the “Elite”, apparently the “Master Race” has already been taken. Their reason to justify inflicting evil, “Saving the world from climate change”, which of course justifies any action, just like the Nazis, “For the Greater good.” And like so many stupid Germans in the 1920s, people today are falling hook, line and sinker for the...
The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1518
Before You Click On The "Read More" Link,
Suggestions For Future Videos?
Email me.
Combine These Three Lines:
Line1: mikemiles
Line2: @
Line3: protonmail.com
Are You Digging The Mystery Vibe?
Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.
If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.
Please Leave Silently Into The Night......
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #2215
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Monday, September 25, 2023
UK Quietly Passes "Online Safety Bill" Into Law
Buried behind the Brand-related headlines yesterday, the British House of Lords voted to pass the controversial “Online Safety Bill” into law. All that’s needed now is Royal assent, which Charles will obviously provide.
The bill’s (very catchy) long-form title is…
A Bill to make provision for and in connection with the regulation by OFCOM of certain internet services; for and in connection with communications offences; and for connected purposes.…and that’s essentially it, it hands the duty of “regulating” certain online content to the UK’s Office of Communications (OfCom).
Ofcom Chief Executive Dame Melanie Dawes could barely contain her excitement in a statement to the press:
“Today is a major milestone in the mission to create a safer life online for children and adults in the UK. Everyone at Ofcom feels privileged to be entrusted with this important role, and we’re ready to start implementing these new laws.”
As always with these things, the bill’s text is a challenging and rather dull read, deliberately obscure in its language and difficult to navigate.
Of some note is the “information offenses” clause, which empowers OfCom to demand “information” from users, companies and employees, and makes it a crime to withhold it. The nature of this “information” is never specified, nor does it appear to be qualified. Meaning it could be anything, and will most likely be used to get private account information about users from social media platforms.
In one of the more worrying clauses, the Bill outlines what they call “communications offenses”. Section 10 details crimes of transmitting “Harmful, false and threatening communications”.
It should be noted that sending threats is already illegal in the UK, so the only new ground covered here is “harmful” and/or “false” information, and the fact they feel the need to differentiate between those two things should worry you.
After all, the truth can definitely be “harmful”…Especially to a power-hungry elite barely controlling an angry populace through dishonest propaganda.
Rather amusingly, the bill makes it a crime to “send a message” containing false information in clause 156…then immediately grants immunity to every newspaper, television channel and streaming service in clause 157.
Apparently it’s OK for the mainstream media to be harmful and dishonest.
But the primary purpose of the new law is a transfer of responsibility to enable and incentivize censorship.
Search engines (“regulated search services”, to quote the bill) and social media companies (“regulated user-to-user services”) will now be held accountable for how people use their platform.
For example: If I were to google “Is it safe to drink bleach?”, find some website that says yes, and then drink bleach, OfCom would not hold me responsible. They would hold Google responsible for letting me read that website. Likewise, if someone tweets @ me telling me to drink bleach, and I do so, Twitter would be held responsible for permitting that communication to take place.
This could result in hefty fines, or even potentially criminal charges, to companies and/or executives of those companies. It could even open them up to massively expensive civil suits (don’t be surprised if such a legal drama hits the headlines soon).
Unsurprisingly the mainstream coverage of the new laws barely mentions any of these concerns, instead opting to put child pornography front and centre. Because the Mrs Lovejoy argument always works.
That’s all window dressing, of course, what this is really about is “misinformation” and “hate speech”. Which is to say, fact-checking mainstream lies and calling out mainstream...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)