FEDS STILL ADVERTISING SAFE ZONES FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS

Despite Pres. Trump’s promise to build a wall and tighten border security, Department of Homeland security (DHS) websites are still advertising safe zones for illegal aliens where they are sheltered from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

“This policy is designed to ensure that these enforcement actions do not occur at nor are focused on sensitive locations such as schools and churches,” ICE’s “Sensitive Locations” policy post still states.

CBP's "Sensitive Locations FAQ" list of safe zones is so extensive that just about any illegal alien can escape arrest as long as they follow these simple rules, as CBP explains - providing a virtual “how-to” guide for illegals

Locations covered by these policies would include, but not be limited to:

If We Give Kids Good Education Will Liberals Go Extinct?

Here's why Betsy DeVos will be a great Education Secretary

Andrew Napolitano: 9th Circuit Ruling ‘Intellectually Dishonest’

Thursday on the Fox News Channel, in reacting to the 9th Circuit Court ruling upholding the blocking of President Trump‘s executive order banning immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States, network senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano called the ruling “an intellectually dishonest piece of work.”

Napolitano said, “The statute specifically says the president on his own, by proclamation, meaning he doesn’t have to consult with anybody else, can make the decision. The decision to ban is not reviewable. Judges are incapable of second-guessing the president on it. For that reason, he may be thinking the Supreme Court is going to invalidate it.”

“I don’t know which way the Supreme Court is going to go and I don’t know which court he had in mind, but this is an intellectually dishonest piece of work the 9th Circuit has produced tonight because it essentially consists of substituting the judgment of three judges for the President of the United States when the Constitution unambiguously gives this area of jurisdiction, foreign policy, exclusively to...

VIDEO: PROFESSOR TELLS STUDENTS “DO NOT OPEN YOUR HEART TO WHITE TRUMP SUPPORTERS”

A professor at Saint Joseph’s University claims that people will actually die due to the Trump administration and his supporters.

According to Campus Reform, Dr. David Perry (chair of the Communications Studies department) at Saint Joseph’s, went on a tirade condemning white voters and making outrageous claims.

The whole thing was caught on an audio tape, and kudos to the student for doing it because sometimes there are consequences to this kind of thing. Like this Orange Coast College student that faced the possibility of being punished for recording a professor’s anti-Trump tirade.

This of course is all following the fact that many professors were resorting to abandoning regular class time to protest Trump.
Perry started out by making it clear that he had disdain for white people that voted for Trump.

“As someone who fights for liberal values, I am not sympathetic to the white voters who make over $50,000 a year and said that ‘we are going to vote for Trump,’ those people, I am not sympathetic to and I do not believe that you have to open your heart to them.”

Perry went on to talk about how Trump voters have in some way dehumanized minorities:

“If you are a person of color in this room, if you are a woman in this room, you do not have to open your heart to them. They told you you’re not a person and it is okay to deal with that how you want.”

Morning Mistress - Leftist Repellent..

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

2 Minutes of Mainstream Media Backtracking Really Puts 'Fake News' In Perspective

Girls With Guns

The Disloyal Opposition...

That Moment When You Become A Meme For Losing Badly..

Smells Like..... Victory...

When Pure Evil Replaces Punxsutawney Phil

..And Disaster Is Averted..

The Truth About Non-Homogeneity...

The Greatest Danger Of All...

Establishment Republicans peddle growth-killing carbon tax at White House

A group of Republican insiders was scheduled to meet at the White House today to push the Trump administration to embrace slapping carbon taxes on the nation’s floundering economy, Sean Moran reports at Breitbart News.

On the campaign trail President Trump came out against enacting a carbon tax. “I will not support or endorse a carbon tax!” he tweeted May 13, 2016. White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus previously said that Trump’s “default position” on climate change is that “most of it is a bunch of bunk.”

Priebus, National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn, Ivanka Trump, and her husband Jared Kushner, were supposed to meet with former Treasury Secretary James Baker and others. The pro-carbon tax group reportedly includes former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, former Walmart chairman Rob Walton, and New America Foundation founder Ted Halstead, but it was unclear at time of writing if they were expected to attend the meeting.

According to Moran,

The insiders would impose a $40 per ton tax on carbon, and potentially increase it in the future. Conservatives on Capitol Hill and Pennsylvania Avenue oppose a carbon tax. […] At $40 per ton of carbon, the plan would raise $300 billion in revenue, and add 36 cents per gallon to gas prices. James Baker has said that they would reallocate the funds in the form of rebates, a family of four would receive $2,000 a year.

James Baker is trying to sell the carbon tax as “something that does not increase, build government, that is conservative, that is free market.”

Some right-of-center groups in Washington like the R Street Institute support carbon taxes, as Michael Bastasch and Steven J. Allen reported in the August 2013 issue of Green Watch. A handful of scholars at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) appear to favor such taxes.

“Conservatives should seize the opportunity to once again emphasize the superiority of free markets over central planning,” R Street’s Andrew Moylan wrote in 2013. “A revenue-neutral carbon tax with regulatory reform could do exactly that.”

Marlo Lewis of the Competitive Enterprise Institute thinks a carbon tax would be disastrous.

The political choice facing the American people is in no small part that between a Republican Party that is anti-tax and pro-energy and a Democratic Party that is anti-energy and pro-tax. This clear product differentiation is an asset for the GOP. Republicans are truly the Dumb Party if they...

Asian Trump Supporter Smashes Liberals And Identity Politics

DO NOT MISS THIS.

Morning Mistress

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

Indian Windows Scammer Prank

Girls With Guns

How to Take Down an Enemy Plane With a 1911 Pistol...

This Pilot is the Only Person to Take Down an Enemy Plane With a 1911 Pistol

Gimme Back My Bullets, Put 'Em Back Where They Belong...

This Seems Like A Really Bad Idea To Me...

This Is How Bill Clinton Kicked Out A Refugee...

The Harvest Of The Regressive Left

He said kill it before it grow -
He said kill them before they grow.

   -Bob Marley

The Fascists In America Are The Regressive Left...

Massive ESPN Financial, Subscriber Losses Drag Down Disney’s First-Quarter Sales

A year that saw arguably the five greatest championship game performances of all time should have helped right the ship for ESPN, and at the very least stopped the trend of massive subscriber losses which have plagued the Bristol-based sports giant for the last few years.

Well, that did not happen, and ESPN appears to be a sinking ship, dragging parent company Disney down with it.

Bloomberg reports that ESPN badly hurt Disney’s first quarter sales, falling well short of projections.

According to The Wrap, “Cable networks, particularly ESPN, have been an albatross on Disney’s stock price even as the company’s two other major prongs, movies and theme parks, continue to perform well. As cheaper TV alternatives began to proliferate, ESPN hemorrhaged subscribers during the course of 2016 and is now at less than 88 million, compared with a peak of 100.1 million in 2011. At an estimated $7 per subscriber, that dip has been a substantial hit to Disney, especially considering media networks made up 49 percent of Disney’s profits during fiscal 2016.”

In other words, everyone else at Disney met or exceeded their projected goals, except for ESPN who lost more than twelve million subscribers in just under six years.

But, the problem for ESPN goes deeper than just losing subscribers and money. The Wrap explains, “At the same time, rights fees for the live sports ESPN specializes in broadcasting continue to go up, as there’s plenty of competition for one of the few pieces of programmed television that still delivers monster ratings. ESPN will pay $7.3 billion for content this year – the biggest price tag among all media companies. Operating income at Disney’s cable networks division — primarily ESPN — plunged 11 percent compared with the same time the previous year. Disney attributed that drop entirely to lower ESPN revenue.”

Less cash on hand means less cash to purchase rights to sporting events, which can prove particularly harmful to an entity that considers itself a sports network. Now, Disney and ESPN have laid much of the blame for their subscriber loss at the feet of ...

A MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD SECURITY BREACH IN CONGRESS

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

Last year, eight members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issued a demand that their staffers be granted access to top secret classified information.

The signatories to the letter were Andre Carson, Luis Guiterez, Jim Himes, Terri Sewell, Jackie Speier, Mike Quigley, Eric Swalwell and Patrick Murphy. All the signatories were Democrats. Some had a history of attempting to undermine national security.

Two of them have been linked to an emerging security breach.

The office of Andre Carson, the second Muslim in Congress, had employed Imran Awan. As did the offices of Jackie Speier and Debbie Wasserman Schultz; to whom the letter had been addressed.

Imran Awan and his two brothers, Jamal and Abid, are at the center of an investigation that deals with, among other things, allegations of illegal access. They have been barred from the House of Representatives network.

A member of Congress expressed concern that, “they may have stolen data from us.”

All three of the Pakistani brothers had been employed by Democrats. The offices that employed them included HPSCI minority members Speier, Carson and Joaquín Castro. Congressman Castro, who also sits on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, utilized the services of Jamal Moiz Awan. Speier and Carson’s offices utilized Imran Awan.

Abid A. Awan was employed by Lois Frankel and Ted Lieu: members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also on the committee is Castro. As is Robin Kelly whose office employed Jamal Awan. Lieu also sits on the subcommittees on National Security and Information Technology of the Committee on Oversight and...

Former Classmate: Keith Ellison Would Rant About Jewish Slavers, Called Jews ‘Oppressors’

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) has dominated the
endorsements game in the race to become the next
 chairman of the Democratic National Committee.

According to a former classmate of Keith Ellison, the Democratic Minnesota Congressman and DNC chair candidate used to use offensive rhetoric about Jews while a student at the University of Minnesota.

That anecdote is buried in an otherwise complimentary profile of the congressman from Mother Jones. Ellison recently came under renewed scrutiny for his past defense of anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan in the student paper, and for inviting Stokely Carmichael to give a campus speech in which he accused “Zionists” of collaborating with the Nazis.

One of the campus critics of Ellison (who then went by ‘Keith Hakim’) was an editor of the Minnesota Daily Michael Olenick. Olenick told Mother Jones that Ellison argued in their conversations that blacks and other oppressed groups “could not be racist toward Jews” because “Jews were themselves oppressors.”

“‘European white Jews are trying to oppress minorities all over the world,'” Olenick said Ellison would tell him. “Keith would go on all the time about ‘Jewish...

Morning Mistress

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

IRS Tax Scam Exposed - Ownage Pranks

Girls With Guns

Shia LaBeouf GETS TROLLED - Compilation (He Will Not Divide Us)

Leftist Dialogue Illustrated...

Knocked Him Right Out....

More Amazing Animated Gifs: ANimated Gif Collection #7

Video: The assassination of Japanese politician Inejiro Asanuma

....Almost There.....Oh!

Are You Ready For The Robot Wars?

Segway Segue

Like A Boss!

Well That Escalated Quickly!

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang!

Get In My Belly!

Move Over!

If it keeps on rainin', levee's goin' to break

Proof That Some Penguins Are Democrats...

Notes From The Future: This Is What The Eiffel Tower Looked Like Before The Islamic State Of France Tore It Asunder...

Looks Like This Guy Had 1...err 10 Too Many....

Cat Surfing...

Molon Labe Ya Pansy Assed Bitch!

Dance With Me, I Want To Be Your Partner..

One Handed Pistol Cocking...

I Need One Of These...

Dogs Best Friend..

If You Insist On Speeding, Learn To Drive...

Only You Can Rock Me, Rock Me...

More Amazing Animated Gifs HERE

Animated Gif Collection #2 HERE

Animated Gif Collection #3

Animated Gif Collection #4

Animated Gif Collection #5 -OR- Motorcycles And Bulls Don't Mix..

Animated Gif Collection #6 or Bet She Lost Some Teeth...

Animated Gif Collection #7 -OR- This Is What Happens When You Fall Asleep While Driving...

Animated Gif Collection #8 -OR- Fish: 1, Dog: 0

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest

Heh, Chuck Woolery Favorited One Of My Tweets....Made My Day!

How To Know When You Are On The Right Side...

Who Are The Antifa?

ANTIFA = Anti First Amendment...

Somali Migrant Admits Stabbing American Woman to Death in UK

The dramatic video released by the Met Police today also shows terrified members of the public running for their lives after the teen began to stab people at random.

A court today heard how Bulhan “smiled and skipped” towards his first victim before continuing the rampage with a “crazed smile” on his face.

Londoner Bernard Hepplewhite was stabbed in the abdomen but said his attacker showed no sign of anger and simply skipped straight on towards his next victim.

At a hearing today unemployed Zakaria Bulhan, 19, admitted killing 64-year-old retired teacher Darlene Horton and injuring several other victims on the evening of August 3 last year.

Bulhan, who is in custody, appeared at the Old Bailey before Mr Justice Spencer this morning where he pleaded not guilty to the charge of murder but guilty to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

He pleaded...

Why President Trump’s Executive Order Is Vital to Protecting America

President Trump’s executive order regarding seven terror-infested countries could not be more critical to ensuring the safety of all Americans. Those who oppose this executive order do so at their own peril and that of their fellow citizens.

First of all, there is no “Muslim ban,” contrary to what the fake news media would have you believe.

There is a ban against travel to the U.S. from seven of the highest risk countries for terrorist activity. It isn’t President Trump’s fault all seven of those countries happen to be almost entirely Islamic. If the Vatican presented the same risk for terrorism as Somalia, they too would have been listed in the executive order. Fortunately, we seem to have the Catholic suicide bomber threat under control.

For too long, Americans have been held captive by the chains of political correctness. While the election of President Trump signaled the beginning of our nation’s awakening, many would prefer we go back to sleep.

After September 11th, 2001, Americans couldn’t understand the psychology of someone who would fly a plane into a building, in exchange for what they believed would be 72 virgins in paradise. They couldn’t understand because they were assigning their own civilized ideals to Islamic radicals, whose beliefs were from a different realm.

More than a decade later, we are still battling this same enemy, which has metastasized tremendously. Not only are we struggling to eliminate Islamic terrorism in the Middle East, we are...

What Rand Meant by Altruism

In modern America, February 2 is best known as Groundhog Day. But it also marks the birth of one of the most praised and criticized thinkers of the past century – Ayn Rand.

Rand sold more than 30 million books. Atlas Shrugged has been ranked behind only the Bible as an influence on readers’ lives. She has also been stridently attacked for issues such as her militant atheism. But perhaps least understood has been her full-bore rejection of altruism. On her birthday, it is worth reconsideration.

Altruism has commonly been held up as the standard for moral behavior. But Rand rejected it, asserting it was “incompatible with freedom, with capitalism, and with individual rights,” and therefore “the basic evil behind today’s ugliest phenomena.”

That head-on collision arises from French philosopher Auguste Comte, coiner of the term altruism. The altruists.org website says he believed “the only moral acts were those intended to promote the happiness of others.” Comte’s Catechisme Positiviste asserts that altruism “gives a direct sanction exclusively to our instincts of benevolence,” and, therefore, “cannot tolerate the notion of rights, for such a notion rests on individualism.”

In Comte’s view, any act performed for any reason beyond solely that of advancing someone else’s well-being is not morally justified. That implies taking a tax deduction for a charitable act strips it of its morality. The same is true when done because “what goes around comes around.” Something as seemingly innocuous as feeling good about doing good also fails Comte’s joyless standards. Even “love your neighbor as yourself” fails his unlimited duty of altruism. As George H. Smith summarized it, “One should love one’s neighbor more than oneself.”

Ayn Rand’s attacks on altruism are aimed at Comte’s definition. However, modern usage has eroded his meaning of altruism to little more than a synonym for generosity, so Rand’s rejection of the original meaning is now often taken as a rejection of generosity, which it is not. In Roderick Long’s words,

… her sometimes misleading rhetoric about the “virtue of selfishness”… was not to advocate the pursuit of one’s own interest at the expense of others … she rejected not only the subordination of one’s interest to those of others, (and it is this, rather than mere benevolence, that she labeled “altruism”), but also the subordination of others’ interest to one’s own.

Rand’s categorical rejection of altruism was a rejection of Comte’s requirement of total selflessness, because that was inconsistent with any individuals mattering for their own sake. Rand vehemently opposed such an invalidation of individuals’ significance.

The basic principle of altruism is that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the only justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue, and value.

Rand’s “virtue of selfishness” was a response to Comte’s demand for complete selflessness. Not only is a requirement for everyone to completely disregard themselves an unattainable ideal, it is self-contradictory. You cannot possibly sacrifice yourself fully for me, while I am also sacrificing myself fully for you. And if no one has any intrinsic value, why would the results, even if possible, be meritorious? With Comte as a starting point, more attention to people’s own well-being – more selfishness, in Rand’s terminology – is the only way to move toward recognizing value in each individual and significance in each life.

Comte’s conception of altruism is also inconsistent with liberty, which was Ayn Rand’s focus. The duty to put others first at all times and in all circumstances denies self-ownership and the power to...