90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Saturday, May 19, 2018

Clapper Claims Their Third World Spying on Trump Was “a Good Thing”

The New York Times earlier this week released a story about the origins of the spying on President Trump’s campaign. The DoJ/FBI dubbed it, ‘Crossfire Hurricane‘. The Times admitted the former administration did spy on the Trump campaign but at the same time claim it was unimportant.

Via the New York Times:

The F.B.I. obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters — a secret type of subpoena — officials said. And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos, current and former officials said. That has become a politically contentious point, with Mr. Trump’s allies questioning whether the F.B.I. was spying on the Trump campaign or trying to entrap campaign officials.

Looking back, some at the Justice Department and the F.B.I. now believe that agents could have been more aggressive. They ultimately interviewed Mr. Papadopoulos in January 2017 and managed to keep it a secret, suggesting they could have done so much earlier.

What is important, they claim, is how Republicans are trying to get the information so they can out the spy. Meanwhile, it is they who are leaking information about the spy – selectively – to get ahead of it.

IT’S A ‘GOOD THING’

According to James Clapper, Obama’s DNI, spying was “a good thing” because the Russians were undermining our entire system.

Where was the spy in Hillary’s campaign? Oh, right, there wasn’t one.

When in U.S. history was it a good thing for the one party to spy on their opponent? This is Third World politics. What is worse is it is passing almost without comment.


In the past, this would be a huge scandal but the media is part of the corruption and Americans are not getting the true story.

We cannot have the U.S. government interfering in an election. We cannot have this again


DOJ/FBI LEAKS — THEY CLAIM REPUBLICANS WILL LEAK

The DoJ/FBI continually complains that the Congress will leak it if they find out who the source/spy is, yet they are the ones leaking the information about the spy. Most of us can guess who the spy is based on the information they released — it’s likely Stefan Halper.

Audaciously, the DoJ/FBI are telling the public that Republicans want to endanger national security and produce the name.

What people need to understand and accept is these people are leftist revolutionaries with no morals, just an ideology. They’re capable of anything and are undermining our...

Morning Mistress

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #261


You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 
from the beautiful to the repugnant, 
from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 
you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 
You have been warned.

Hot Pick Of The Late Night

Friday, May 18, 2018

Indie Comic 'Jawbreakers' Attacked by SJW Marvel


Girls With Guns

This Is Child Abuse....


Throughout Human History Children Have Been Raised As Either Boy Or Girl.
Stop The Insanity.

The Rats Scramble When The Lights Come On....




A Wednesday piece by The New York Times which details the FBI’s investigation into Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign may have revealed more than intended, at least if a Wall Street Journal reporter who has covered the surveillance previously is correct.

The Journal’s Kimberley Strassel has written about the investigation in the past. In a piece last week, she posited that the FBI may have used a mole in the Trump campaign, particularly given the Department of Justice’s reluctance to turn over information about the informant to congressional investigators.

The Times piece revealed more details about the Trump campaign surveillance operation — called “Crossfire Hurricane” in reference to the Rolling Stones song “Jumpin’ Jack Flash” — and just how extensive it was.

While the tenor of the article, which was written by Matt Apuzzo, Adam Goldman and Nicholas Fandos, is overwhelmingly favorable to the FBI and dismisses any claims that the surveillance was politically motivated ,(“I never saw anything that resembled a witch hunt or suggested that the bureau’s approach to the investigation was politically driven,” one DOJ official is quoted as saying) there were a few things buried deep in there that specifically caught Strassel’s attention.

In a tweetstorm Wednesday evening, Strassel noted key problems in The Times’ narrative, particularly when the story appeared and significant facts that they glossed over.

Strassel first argued that the article was a calculated leak of sorts in an effort to get out ahead of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and the information that he’s gathering and releasing regarding the FBI’s sources on the Trump investigation.
1. So a few important points on that new NYT "Hurricane Crossfire" piece. A story that, BTW, all of us following this knew had to be coming. This is DOJ/FBI leakers' attempt to get in front of the facts Nunes is forcing out, to make it not sound so bad. Don't buy it. It's bad.
However, she says it proves what Trump was claiming all along: namely, that his campaign was being spied upon.

I Don't Think You Are Supposed To Park Like That...



More Amazing Animated Gifs:

Video: The assassination of Japanese politician Inejiro Asanuma


More Amazing Animated Gifs HERE
Animated Gif Collection #2 HERE
Animated Gif Collection #3
Animated Gif Collection #4
Animated Gif Collection #5 -OR- Motorcycles And Bulls Don't Mix..
Animated Gif Collection #6 or Bet She Lost Some Teeth...
Animated Gif Collection #7 -OR- This Is What Happens When You Fall Asleep While Driving...
Animated Gif Collection #8 -OR- Fish: 1, Dog: 0
Out Of Control Bus -OR- Animated Gif Collection #9
How To Launch An Oil Truck Into The Air -OR- Animated Gif Collection #10


If General Mattis Runs For Congress In 2020....



...It Will Be Mad Dog 2020...


This Is What The Second Amendment Is For....

#gunrights

If You Deny This Right...

Donald Trump is right. MS-13 members are 'animals.'

Street gang MS-13, infamous for vicious machete killings, is first to be declared an international criminal group.” That’s a headline from the Daily Mail in 2012.

“The gratuitous acts of violence these now-convicted gang members committed were intended to spread fear.” That’s a description from acting U.S. Attorney John Horn about a 2015 murder conviction in Georgia.

Video of the mutilated bodies was sent to a girlfriend of one of the victims.” “She was walking home one evening with Nisa, a basketball teammate one day shy of her 16th birthday, when MS-13 members spotted them and attacked with a machete and baseball bats.” “A large butcher knife, a bloodstained baseball hat and three 9mm handguns were also found in the car.”

Those are all different incidents. All MS-13.

On Wednesday, President Trump was speaking as part of his roundtable discussion on California’s sanctuary laws and was asked about MS-13. His response set off a firestorm.

Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims brought up the gang and her department’s ability to combat them: “There could be an MS-13 member that I know about” and yet can’t report to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Trump replied, saying in part, “These aren't people. These are animals."

The controversy blew up when people and news organizations used the quote or clip without the context of Mims’ question. Trump wasn’t calling all illegal immigrants animals. One widely favored and retweeted response referred to Trump’s remark as the “language of ethnic cleansing.”

Quickly, though, people on the right (and some journalists) corrected the record. That it was about MS-13 was reported more widely. Even so, many on the left, including notably House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, simply recalibrated to defend the humanity of the gang itself.

“Does he not believe in the spark of divinity, the dignity and worth of every person?” Pelosi asked.

Likewise, CNBC’s John Harwood said, “However repugnant their actions, MS-13 gang members are human beings IMHO.”

Madness.

The question is whether it was fair or wise of Trump to call MS-13 animals, and whether it’s a morally objectionable statement overall.

The American Heritage Dictionary third definition of “animal” is “a person who behaves in a bestial or brutish manner.” By that definition, “animal” isn’t nearly strong enough.

Today's news spat over MS-13 is part of a longer-running drama. Since Trump took office, there has been an effort to downplay the gang’s significance even as Trump has rhetorically raised its profile.

He's not the only president to do so. In 2012 — you know, under President Obama — MS-13 was formally designated a transnational criminal organization by the Treasury Department. At the time, this was characterized approvingly as a “crackdown” by the Obama administration.

MS-13 (or Mara Salvatrucha), a primarily El Salvador-based gang that started in Los Angeles, was believed to have about 10,000 members across the country at that time and Central America. They were known for hacking enemies to death, executing people in broad daylight in view of witnesses, and fatally beating people with...