90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Monday, October 21, 2019

UK: Muslim gets “community order” for “appalling damage” of church, non-Muslim got prison for bacon sandwich at mosque



How bad have things gotten in Britain? This bad: a Muslim teenager named Muhammad Mughal has been sentenced in Britain to what the Telegraph & Argus calls a “12-month community order” for “mindless vandalism” of All Saints Church on Highfield Lane in Keighley last year. This is the same Britain in which, three years ago, a man named Kevin Crehan was sentenced to a year in prison for leaving a bacon sandwich outside a mosque, and died in prison halfway through his sentence under circumstances that British authorities have never deigned to explain. British officialdom continues to make its priorities abundantly clear.

THE DAMAGE TO ALL SAINTS CHURCH, SAYS THE TELEGRAPH & ARGUS, “INCLUDED DAUBING GRAFFITI ON THE WALLS, DAMAGING DOORS, BREAKING WINDOWS AND LETTING OFF FIRE EXTINGUISHERS. A MACHETE THE INTRUDERS FOUND IN THE CHURCH KITCHEN WAS USED IN COURSE OF THE OFFENCE AND FOUND TO HAVE MUGHAL’S DNA ON IT.” JUDGE JONATHAN ROSE SAID THAT MUGHAL AND HIS FRIENDS HAD PERPETRATED “INEXPLICABLE AND APPALLING DAMAGE.”

Rose told Mughal: “You are at risk of going to custody.” At risk, but actually going. “This court,” the judge continued, “takes an extremely dim view of those who desecrate a place of worship.” Yes, extremely dim, but not nearly as dim as British authorities’ view of something really serious, like leaving a bacon sandwich outside a mosque.

“Sentencing Mughal today,” the Telegraph & Argus continued, “Recorder Dafydd Enoch QC told him that some people mistakenly believed that churches were ‘fair game’ for this type of behaviour. ‘They are jolly well not. They are places of importance and sanctity,’ he said.”

That’s telling him, Dafydd! Why, he is certain never to vandalize a church again, after getting such a strongly-worded rebuke! British justice is swift, sure, and sweeping! Why, just ask Kevin Crehan how much mosques are “places of importance and sanctity” in Britain! Clearly churches aren’t as important as that, and why should they be? After all, who will be ruling Britain in a few decades – Muslims or Christians?

Perhaps it is with an awareness of their nation’s demographic future that the British government has long ago left behind any commitment to basic human decency. The Home Office some time ago banned Martin Sellner, Brittany Pettibone, Lauren Southern and Lutz Bachmann from entering, all for the crime of opposing jihad terror and Sharia oppression, and thereby made it clear that it is more authoritarian and unwilling to uphold the freedom of speech than ever – at least when it comes to criticism of Islam, Muslim rape gangs, and mass Muslim migration.

The bannings of Sellner, Pettibone, Southern, and Bachmann were just part of a long pattern. Pamela Geller and I were banned in 2013, apparently for life, also for the crime of...

What is The Difference Between California And The Titanic?


Burns Like A California Wildfire....


Big Government and Environmentalists Are Causing Massive Fires in Western States

Choose The Reason California Is Now The Worst State In America....

Morning Mistress

The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #84



Before You Click On The "Read More" Link, 

Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.

If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.  

Please Leave Silently Into The Night......

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #781


You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside? 
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific, 
from the beautiful to the repugnant, 
from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed, 
you could be inspired, you could be appalled. 

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. 
You have been warned.

Hot Pick of The Late Night

Sunday, October 20, 2019

Ocasio-Cortez Says We Need More Government Control To Have More Freedom


New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has given her endorsement to her Tio (Uncle) Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

And not only because he is a fellow Democrat Socialist, whatever that means, but because he, like she, recognizes that illegal aliens work harder than Americans.

“I’m proud to say that the only reason I had any hope in launching a long-shot campaign for Congress is because Bernie Sanders proved that you can run a grassroots campaign in an America where we thought it was impossible,” she said.



“Maybe to others, he is a brother. But he is my Tio Bernie Sanders,” she said to the cheers of the adoring crowd.

“Last year, last February, I was working as a waitress in downtown Manhattan. I worked shoulder to shoulder with undocumented workers who often worked harder and the hardest for the least amount of money,” she said.

Isn’t that nice? An American congresswoman saying that undocumented immigrants work harder than Americans.

“I didn’t have health care. I wasn’t being paid a living wage. And I didn’t think I deserved any of those things.

“Because that is the script that we tell working people here and all over this country: Your inherent worth and value as a human being is dependent on an income that another person decided to underpay us.

“But what we are here to do is to turn around the very basic lie. It wasn’t until I heard of a man by the name of Bernie Sanders that I began to question, assert, and recognize my inherent value as a human being that deserves health care, housing, education, and...

Girls With Guns

For The Love Of God!!!


Who Does LeBron Cuck For?


LeBron James undermines values he's espoused in most disgraceful moment of career


"Oh yeah. He's a total BAIZUO!"



Looks Like The Chinese Nailed Leftists...

A Growth Dilemma: China on an Economic Seesaw



The decline in the Chinese economy is a natural consequence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s blind and relentless pursuit of high growth.

Gone are the days of temporary­­­ prosperity driven by exports and real estate prices. Now Beijing is trying desperately to sustain the economy by playing a dangerous seesaw game between soaring housing prices and declining consumption.

This is an unfulfilling and ineffective last resort that will fail to stop or hide the increasingly obvious deceleration of the Chinese economy.

From Growth Frenzy to Growth Dilemma

A country’s economic growth relies on three factors, often referred to as the three-horse-carriage. They are exportation, consumption, and investment. Economic growth would slow down significantly when one or two of the horses lose mobility. If all three fail, the economy can’t go far.

The Chinese economy today is just like a carriage without a horse. Due to the recent deterioration of the China-U.S. relationship, China’s exports have suffered significant losses with the August export volume down 4.3 percent compared to last year, the first decline in nearly three years. In the meantime both investment and consumption also deflated. Real estate investment growth has slowed for four consecutive months, and August manufacturing activity declined by 1.6 percent compared to a year ago. Consumer buying power has also been weakening. While Chinese authorities had to admit to the downward trend, they are unwilling to acknowledge that the past frenzy for high growth is the true cause of today’s decline.


Let’s first discuss the absurdity of China’s export gold rush. After China joined the WTO in 2001, it has relied on exports to pump up its economy. Between 2003 and 2007, China’s exports increased by 25 percent each year.

China’s foreign trade dependence (or FTD, ratio of the total amount of foreign trade of a country to its GDP) soared from 38.5 percent in 2001 to 67 percent by 2006, more than four times as high as Japan’s peak FTD towards the end of its asset price bubble era. Drunk withthe its effortless prosperity, China did not realize such export-reliant growth is not only unsustainable, but also very fragile.

Can a country maintain a 25 percent annual export growth rate for decades? Obviously not. For a very small country with low export volume, theoretically it may be possible to maintain a longer term trade surplus. But for a large country like China, with 26 percent of the world’s work force, the global market is too small for it to maintain long term export growth even if all other...