90 Miles From Tyranny : 3-D Printed Gun Lawsuit Starts the War Between Gun Control and Free Speech

Thursday, May 7, 2015

3-D Printed Gun Lawsuit Starts the War Between Gun Control and Free Speech

THIS WEEK MARKS the two-year anniversary since Cody Wilson, the inventor of the world’s first 3-D printable gun, received a letter from the State Department demanding that he remove the blueprints for his plastic-printed firearm from the internet. The alternative: face possible prosecution for violating regulations that forbid the international export of unapproved arms.

Now Wilson is challenging that letter. And in doing so, he’s picking a fight that could pit proponents of gun control and defenders of free speech against each other in an age when the line between a lethal weapon and a collection of bits is blurrier than ever before.

Wilson’s gun manufacturing advocacy group Defense Distributed, along with the gun rights group the Second Amendment Foundation, on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against the State Department and several of its officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry. In their complaint, they claim that a State Department agency called the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) violated their first amendment right to free speech by telling Defense Distributed that it couldn’t publish a 3-D printable file for its one-shot plastic pistol known as the Liberator, along with a collection of other printable gun parts, on its website.

By posting a file online, the DDTC claimed Defense Distributed had potentially violated arms export controls—just as if it had shipped AR-15s to Mexico.

In its 2013 letter to Defense Distributed, the DDTC cited a long-controversial set of ...

Read More HERE


  1. Treaties are not binding on citizens. They are binding on nations. If the national legislature does not pass laws (legislation) to enforce the treaty on it's own citizens, then the citizens are free to ignore the treaties. A State department opinion has no legal force except within the state department.

  2. Whatever the outcome of the controversy, it still works as a distraction and money sink for the hoplophobics and their political organizations.


Test Word Verification