Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
Anyway, why hadn't SCOTUS ruled on until now? They could have convened an emergency session instead of waiting years for cases to wend through the legal system
In delaying for 3 1/2 years, Justice is denied. How does this not violate the 6A plus various Acts by Congress with respect to a speedy trial?
4 comments:
Except that is not what SCOTUS held.
The court case is Fischer v. U.S. Government.
Barret's dissenting opinion is interesting. Basically, she argued the lack of foresight by Congress leaves open the interpretation of the law.
This is doubly interesting vis a vis the recent ruling in Chevron
Anyway, why hadn't SCOTUS ruled on until now?
They could have convened an emergency session instead of waiting years for cases to wend through the legal system
In delaying for 3 1/2 years, Justice is denied.
How does this not violate the 6A plus various Acts by Congress with respect to a speedy trial?
My first comment made only minutes ago has now disappeared.
Fischer v. U.S. Government
Yes, it went into the spam folder. I published it.
Post a Comment