Imagine The Who In A Youtube Video Here....
Tuesday, June 25, 2019
Animated Gif Collection #14
More Amazing Animated Gifs HERE
Animated Gif Collection #2 HERE
Animated Gif Collection #3
Animated Gif Collection #4
Animated Gif Collection #5 -OR- Motorcycles And Bulls Don't Mix..
Animated Gif Collection #6 or Bet She Lost Some Teeth...
Animated Gif Collection #7 -OR- This Is What Happens When You Fall Asleep While Driving...
Animated Gif Collection #8 -OR- Fish: 1, Dog: 0
Animated Gif Collection #9 -OR-Out Of Control Bus -OR-
Animated Gif Collection #10 -OR- How To Launch An Oil Truck Into The Air
Animated Gif Collection #11 -OR- Man That Must Have Hurt
Animated GIF Collection #12 -OR- This Is Brutal
Animated Gif Collection #13 -OR- This Guy Was Inches From DEATH!
Animated Gif Collection #14
Animated Gif Collection #15
Animated Gif Collection #16 -OR- Make It Rain!
Animated Gif Collection #17 -OR- THIS IS NOT HOW YOU KILL THE CHINESE CORONA VIRUS!
"It Would Be An Earthquake" - Three Chinese Banks Tumble After US Threatens To Cut Them Off From SWIFT
In news that initially did not receive much prominence, on Monday a US judge found three large Chinese banks — reportedly the state-owned Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, and Shanghai Pudong Development Bank — in contempt for refusing to comply with subpoenas in an investigation into North Korean sanctions violations. This could open the door for them to be cut off from the US financial system, i.e. SWIFT.
"Should it occur, to say that China will not take that well is as large an understatement as one can conceive of. It would be an earthquake", commented Rabobank's Michael Every.
The stunning development follows a May district judge order that three Chinese banks comply with U.S. investigators’ demands that they hand over records connected to the alleged movement of tens of millions of dollars in violation of international sanctions on North Korea. The publicly released court document did not name the banks, the Hong Kong company, or the North Korean entity at that time.
As the WaPo adds, according to a 2017 ruling by the US DOJ, the banks were accused of working with a Hong Kong company, which allegedly laundered more than $100 million for North Korea’s sanctioned Foreign Trade Bank. The newspaper said the bank at risk of losing access to U.S. dollars appeared to be Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, whose ownership structure, limited U.S. presence and alleged conduct with other banks matched with the details disclosed in the court rulings.
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank doesn’t have U.S. branch operations but maintains accounts in that country to handle dollar transactions, the report said, adding the subpoena battle will go before a federal appeals court in Washington on July 12.
“The ruling means that Attorney General William P. Barr or Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin can terminate the bank’s U.S. account and ability to process U.S. dollar transactions,” the Post said.
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, asked about the report that it could lose access to the U.S. financial system, said in a statement that it will strictly abide by the relevant laws and regulations. Meanwhile, China Merchants Bank told Reuters on Tuesday it complies with related United Nations resolutions and Chinese laws, and is not involved in...
ALERT: Within Hours Of Releasing Shocking Google Manipulation Report, Project Veritas Site Goes Down
As of right now, the ProjectVeritas website can no longer be accessed. This “website down” moment occurred within hours of the investigative site’s video release of the stunning lengths Google execs are allegedly taking to ensure “we never have another Trump.”
America is becoming an increasingly scary place, isn’t it? And it has nothing to do with President Trump but rather the collective and far-reaching powers that are so determined to destroy him and his tens of millions of supporters. Google’s political leanings are well known by now, and the company has every right to its opinion be it political or other, but let’s all hope it had nothing to do with a potential attack on an opposing viewpoint’s investigative website.
You can check in on the website yourself HERE
And if you haven’t done so yet you can watch the site’s most recent investigative report below:
Tom Fitton: New Smoking Gun Emails Expose FBI-Media Collusion against Trump
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton appeared on “Lou Dobbs Tonight” on the Fox Business Network to discuss AG Bill Barr’s review of the origin of the Russia Probe, the FBI feeding the New York Times a story on Jared Kushner, Rep. Nunes’s letter to the FBI about an additional Russia investigation scope memos, and more!
“Letter From Charles D. Levy To President Calvin Coolidge, A Republican Requesting Protection From The Democrats Of The Ku Klux Klan,” 6/24/1924
BREAKING, Mexico Deploys 15,000 Troops on U.S. Southern Border
This is a big milestone as it shows the Mexican government is serious about stemming the flow of migrants, as CNN reports:
Mexico has deployed almost 15,000 troops to the US-Mexico border, according to the country’s Secretary of Defense Luis Sandoval.
“In the northern part of the country, we have deployed a total of almost 15,000 troops composed of National Guard elements and military units,” Sandoval announced today in Cancun.
Approximately 2,000 National Guard members have already been deployed to Mexico’s southern border with Belize and Guatemala, he noted, adding to the 4,500 troops already spread across the area. Many migrants begin their journey in Central America and even further south, passing through Mexico on their way toward the United States.
The deployments come after renewed pressure from the Trump administration on Mexico to help slow migration flows northward. Mexico, however, has also called on the United Nations and the United States to help with the monumental task.
This is another win for President Trump and the American people.
The Mexican government is sadly doing far more to solve this problem than Democrats, as Reuters reports:
Incredible hypocrisy as Democrats demand Trump be arrested once he leaves office
Elections are no longer just an advanced auction of stolen goods, as Mencken so gnomically put it. They're now advanced cases of court remand.
The Trump campaign's winning strapline may have been "build the wall," but it was the stadium-friendly chant of "lock her up," in reference to Hillary Clinton's skirting of the law, that really kindled supporters' excitement.
At the time, the half-joking incantation of incarceration at Trump rallies was seen as an existential threat to democracy, the Constitution, baseball, apple pie, and the red-white-and-blue bunting your mother drapes over the porch balustrade every Fourth of July.
The late Charles Krauthammer decried the threat of bringing Clinton under the remit of the law for her illegal email practices. "Such incendiary talk is an affront to elementary democratic decency and a breach of the boundaries of American political discourse." You know an august commentator like Krauthammer is truly offended when he uses the genteel noun "affront."
While keening over the death of institutional civility in the Washington Post, two university professors described the chants as "disturbing" yet "inevitable," because "[Republican] attacks on the legitimacy of Democratic candidates and presidents are hardly new." Fancy that, seeing as how liberals haven't met a legitimate Republican president since Warren Harding, and even he had some peccadilloes of his own.
"This is also not how democracies work. Elected officials do not jail their foes," Yoni Appelbaum preened in The Atlantic. Appelbaum, in sticking with his high ideals, now wants Trump to be impeached.
Democrats and their friendly mimeograph operators in the press have now fully reversed field on the question of legally threatening your political opponent. What was once a banana-republic campaign strategy is now the newest wrinkle in the Democrats' playbook.
"A role reversal is starting to play out, with some Democrats openly taunting President Donald Trump with threats he'll be the one spending time behind bars after he's out of office," reports Politico. At least two presidential contenders are openly considering prosecuting Trump after he's out of office. Senator Kamala Harris, whose trimmer ambitions and plasticated, put-on smile belie a martinet-like prosecutorial record, said the Department of Justice "would have no choice, and that they should" go after Trump once he no longer enjoys legal immunity. Pete Buttigieg, the upstart mayor of South Bend, Ind., explained in an interview, "To the extent that there's an obstruction case, then yes, DOJ's got to deal with it."
Even speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who has so far demurred at the prospect of impeaching the president, said she wants to see Trump "in prison." Nance might want to check in with all the derelicts in her district smearing scat and dropping hypodermic needles in the streets before she considers throwing Trump in the clink.
All the talk of Trump's comeuppance, and the near guarantee of Democrat voters chanting "lock him up!" at Cory Booker's living-room conclaves, provides a nice contrast to the president's raucous 2016 campaign, which was regarded as not in good odor by journalists who frequently get the vapors over Trump tweets. Several words come to mind as Democrats drool over the idea of imprisoning Trump: hypocrisy, overwrought, vindictive, histrionic, petty, puerile, perfervid. None of those will make an appearance in the reporting on Democratic rallies, though; only kooks are highlighted at Republican events, while charmingly bigoted fellows like the Black Hebrew Nationalists are an unremarked upon presence wherever Democrats speak.
On a larger note, the idea that a presidential successor would prosecute his predecessor is ludicrous. Even when the previous administration broke laws, American presidents move on for the sake of the country. From the Obama administration granting immunity to...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)