Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Showing posts sorted by date for query allen west. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query allen west. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Tuesday, March 1, 2022
Racism: The REAL reason the U.S. attacked Japan during World War 2.
A course titled “Global Whiteness” taught at the University of North Carolina blames the West and the United States for the war against Japan during World War II.
Among the topics discussed by students in Professor Mark Driscoll’s class are Donald Trump’s racism and “interracial hookups on campus.”
According to the syllabus obtained by Campus Reform, the course covers the concept of race since the 19th century, but it also provides revisionist narratives of American history, particularly the second world war.
It describes WWII’s Pacific theater fight as “the first global attack on white Anglo-American hegemony” and “Japan’s attempt to roll back Euro-American colonialism.”
One of the course’s required text is Theodore Allen’s “The Invention of the White Race, vol. 2: The Origin of Racial Oppression in Anglo-America.”
Driscoll, an adjunct instructor in Global Studies, says in the syllabus’s “Methods” section that he cannot “emphasize enough” the “partial and incomplete nature of professorial knowledge,” and that students have a “right and duty” to seek out “alternate truths.”.
“Alternate Truths?” I would have thought “Alternate Viewpoints” might be what a college should be teaching.
There will also be readings from Ibram X. Kendi in Introduction to Racial Science, “Enlightenment or Enwhitenment?”, “Criminalization of Blackness” and “Whiteness Dispossessed (Whiteness After Obama).”
According to a syllabus previously reviewed by Campus Reform, an earlier version of the course, taught in 2019, included a class session titled “Nasty, Angry White People.”
Students in the course will be required to give a presentation based on any one of 32 listed topics.
And topics on which students can do presentations include:
— “How is Trump racist?”
— “Black/white hooking up at UNC”
— “White/Asian hooking up at UNC.”
— “White Trash”
— “Whites in Hip-hop”
— “Should white people pay reparations for slavery?”
— “War on Terror (and racialization of Muslims)”
— “Killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri”
— “1619 Project”
In his faculty page, Driscoll notes he “explores colonially influenced transformations in political and economic organization, philosophy, psychology, and literature, with a focus on...
Friday, February 25, 2022
An In-Depth Look at Islam's Achilles Heel
The history of Islam and the West has been one of unwavering antagonism and seismic clashes, often initiated by the followers of Muhammad. By the standards of history, nothing between the two forces is as well documented as this long war. Accordingly, for more than a millennium, both educated and not so educated Europeans knew—the latter perhaps instinctively—that Islam was a militant creed that for centuries attacked and committed atrocities in their homelands, all in the name of "holy war," or jihad. In the words of Konstantin Mihailović, a fifteenth-century Serb who was forced to convert to Islam in his youth and made to fight as a slave-soldier for the Turks until he escaped: "the Persians, the Turks, the Tatars, the Berbers, and the Arabs; and the diverse Moors ... [all] conduct themselves according to the accursed Koran, that is, the scripture of Mohammed."
This long-held perspective has been radically twisted in recent times. According to the dominant narrative — as upheld by mainstream media and Hollywood, pundits and politicians, academics, and "experts" of all stripes — Islam was historically progressive and peaceful, whereas premodern Europe was fanatical and predatory. Or, to quote the BBC, "[t]hroughout the Middle Ages, the Muslim world was more advanced and more civilised than Christian Western Europe, which learned a huge amount from its neighbour."
The reason for these topsy-turvy claims is that "who controls the past controls the future," as George Orwell observed in his 1984 (a dystopian novel that has become increasingly applicable to our times). It is, therefore, unsurprising to discover that the greatest apologia for politically active Islamists and their leftist allies — and the first premise for all subsequent apologias for Islam — is purely historical in nature.
Recall, for instance, the most popular and oft-asked question to arise after the September 11, 2001 terror strikes: "Why do they hate us?" Unbeknownst to most, this question presupposed — indeed, was heavily laden with — a historical point of view that had been forged over decades and largely remains unquestioned, even by critics of modern Islam: because Islam was tolerant and advanced in the past, this entrenched perspective holds, its current problems in the present — authoritarianism, intolerance, violence, radicalization, terrorism, etc. — must be aberrations, products of unfavorable circumstances, politics, economics, "grievances" — anything and everything but Islam itself. Simply put, if they did not "hate us" before — but were rather progressive and tolerant — surely something other than Islam has since "gone wrong."
From here one can see the importance of safeguarding the current narrative of a historically "advanced" and "tolerant" Islam vis-à-vis a historically "backward" and "intolerant" Europe.
I myself experienced firsthand just how important controlling this narrative is for political Islamists. After the U.S. Army War College invited me to lecture on my last history book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and its leftist allies launched an "unprecedented" attack on me and the War College. They issued — on two separate occasions — press releases and hysterical petitions (presenting the War College — even me, an ethnic Egyptian — as "white supremacists") and made several direct calls to and met with the heads of the War College — all in an effort to get my talk canceled.
In the end, they failed, in part because the National Association of Scholars sent a petition letter to then-president Donald Trump signed by over five thousand people, mostly university-affiliated academics. Ten congressmen also came to my support. More to the point, and as retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives Allen West, who also came to my support, explained, "not one sentence of his recent literary project [Sword and Scimitar] was mentioned by these Islamo-fascists [as being wrong]."
When CAIR and "woke" allies realized that their attempts at academic censorship had failed and that I would speak anyway, they urged the War College, and it agreed, to allow another historian to present a "counterview" in response to my lecture. This was John Voll, professor emeritus of Islamic history at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. (See here for how this renowned apologist misrepresented and whitewashed Islam's history of terror vis-à-vis the West.) Unfortunately, and despite the fact that the War College videotaped my talk (objectively summarized by a reporter here) and informed me that it would be, like all of their talks, posted online, it never was published.
At any rate, why did CAIR and its allies launch such an attack on me in the first place, especially considering that they did not respond similarly to my other books, which I also lectured about in other prestigious venues — books that dealt with current and hot topics (e.g., Crucified Again: Exposing Islam's New War on Christians and The Al Qaeda Reader)? Why instead did they go after a book that revolved around, of all things, "ancient history" — and with such vehemence, at one point desperately insisting that if I am allowed to lecture on it at the War College, American servicemen would get so riled as to start massacring Muslims on sight?
Because they too know what is at stake; they too know that "who controls the past" — which they are determined to continue doing — "controls the future." So long as the people of the West accept as a first premise that Islam was historically and for centuries an advanced, enlightened, and tolerant force — especially in comparison to...
This long-held perspective has been radically twisted in recent times. According to the dominant narrative — as upheld by mainstream media and Hollywood, pundits and politicians, academics, and "experts" of all stripes — Islam was historically progressive and peaceful, whereas premodern Europe was fanatical and predatory. Or, to quote the BBC, "[t]hroughout the Middle Ages, the Muslim world was more advanced and more civilised than Christian Western Europe, which learned a huge amount from its neighbour."
The reason for these topsy-turvy claims is that "who controls the past controls the future," as George Orwell observed in his 1984 (a dystopian novel that has become increasingly applicable to our times). It is, therefore, unsurprising to discover that the greatest apologia for politically active Islamists and their leftist allies — and the first premise for all subsequent apologias for Islam — is purely historical in nature.
Recall, for instance, the most popular and oft-asked question to arise after the September 11, 2001 terror strikes: "Why do they hate us?" Unbeknownst to most, this question presupposed — indeed, was heavily laden with — a historical point of view that had been forged over decades and largely remains unquestioned, even by critics of modern Islam: because Islam was tolerant and advanced in the past, this entrenched perspective holds, its current problems in the present — authoritarianism, intolerance, violence, radicalization, terrorism, etc. — must be aberrations, products of unfavorable circumstances, politics, economics, "grievances" — anything and everything but Islam itself. Simply put, if they did not "hate us" before — but were rather progressive and tolerant — surely something other than Islam has since "gone wrong."
From here one can see the importance of safeguarding the current narrative of a historically "advanced" and "tolerant" Islam vis-à-vis a historically "backward" and "intolerant" Europe.
I myself experienced firsthand just how important controlling this narrative is for political Islamists. After the U.S. Army War College invited me to lecture on my last history book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and its leftist allies launched an "unprecedented" attack on me and the War College. They issued — on two separate occasions — press releases and hysterical petitions (presenting the War College — even me, an ethnic Egyptian — as "white supremacists") and made several direct calls to and met with the heads of the War College — all in an effort to get my talk canceled.
In the end, they failed, in part because the National Association of Scholars sent a petition letter to then-president Donald Trump signed by over five thousand people, mostly university-affiliated academics. Ten congressmen also came to my support. More to the point, and as retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives Allen West, who also came to my support, explained, "not one sentence of his recent literary project [Sword and Scimitar] was mentioned by these Islamo-fascists [as being wrong]."
When CAIR and "woke" allies realized that their attempts at academic censorship had failed and that I would speak anyway, they urged the War College, and it agreed, to allow another historian to present a "counterview" in response to my lecture. This was John Voll, professor emeritus of Islamic history at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. (See here for how this renowned apologist misrepresented and whitewashed Islam's history of terror vis-à-vis the West.) Unfortunately, and despite the fact that the War College videotaped my talk (objectively summarized by a reporter here) and informed me that it would be, like all of their talks, posted online, it never was published.
At any rate, why did CAIR and its allies launch such an attack on me in the first place, especially considering that they did not respond similarly to my other books, which I also lectured about in other prestigious venues — books that dealt with current and hot topics (e.g., Crucified Again: Exposing Islam's New War on Christians and The Al Qaeda Reader)? Why instead did they go after a book that revolved around, of all things, "ancient history" — and with such vehemence, at one point desperately insisting that if I am allowed to lecture on it at the War College, American servicemen would get so riled as to start massacring Muslims on sight?
Because they too know what is at stake; they too know that "who controls the past" — which they are determined to continue doing — "controls the future." So long as the people of the West accept as a first premise that Islam was historically and for centuries an advanced, enlightened, and tolerant force — especially in comparison to...
Monday, January 17, 2022
Supply Chain Woes Could Worsen as China Imposes New Covid Lockdowns
Xi’an, China, during a coronavirus lockdown last month. At least 20 million people, or about 1.5 percent of China’s population, are in lockdown across the country |
American manufacturers are worried that China’s zero-tolerance coronavirus policy could throw a wrench in the global conveyor belt for goods this year.
WASHINGTON — Companies are bracing for another round of potentially debilitating supply chain disruptions as China, home to about a third of global manufacturing, imposes sweeping lockdowns in an attempt to keep the Omicron variant at bay.
The measures have already confined tens of millions of people to their homes in several Chinese cities and contributed to a suspension of connecting flights through Hong Kong from much of the world for the next month. At least 20 million people, or about 1.5 percent of China’s population, are in lockdown, mostly in the city of Xi’an in western China and in Henan Province in north-central China.
The country’s zero-tolerance policy has manufacturers — already on edge from spending the past two years dealing with crippling supply chain woes — worried about another round of shutdowns at Chinese factories and ports. Additional disruptions to the global supply chain would come at a particularly fraught moment for companies, which are struggling with rising prices for raw materials and shipping along with extended delivery times and worker shortages.
China used lockdowns, contact tracing and quarantines to halt the spread of the coronavirus nearly two years ago after its initial emergence in Wuhan. These tactics have been highly effective, but the extreme transmissibility of the Omicron variant poses the biggest test yet of China’s system.
So far, the effects of the lockdowns on Chinese factory production and deliveries have been limited. Four of China’s largest port cities — Shanghai, Dalian, Tianjin and Shenzhen — have imposed narrowly targeted lockdowns to try to control small outbreaks of the Omicron variant. As of this weekend, these cities had not locked down their docks. Still, Volkswagen and Toyota announced last week that they would temporarily suspend operations in Tianjin because of lockdowns.
Analysts warn that many industries could face disruptions in the flow of goods as China tries to stamp out any coronavirus infections ahead of the Winter Olympics, which will be held in Beijing next month. On Saturday, Beijing officials reported the city’s first case of the Omicron variant, prompting the authorities to lock down the infected person’s residential compound and workplace.
If extensive lockdowns become more widespread in China, their effects on supply chains could be felt across the United States. Major new disruptions could depress consumer confidence and exacerbate inflation, which is already at a 40-year high, posing challenges for the Biden administration and the Federal Reserve.
“Will the Chinese be able to control it or not I think is a really important question,” said Craig Allen, the president of the U.S.-China Business Council. “If they’re going to have to begin closing down port cities, you’re going to have additional supply chain disruptions.”
The potential for setbacks comes just as many companies had hoped they were about to see some easing of the bottlenecks that have clogged global supply chains since the pandemic began.
The combination of intermittent shutdowns at factories, ports and warehouses around the world and American consumers’ surging demand for foreign goods has thrown the global delivery system out of whack. Transportation costs have skyrocketed, and ports and warehouses have experienced pileups of products waiting to be shipped or driven elsewhere while other parts of the supply chain are stymied by shortages.
For the 2021 holiday season, customers largely circumvented those challenges by ordering early. High shipping prices began to ease after the holiday rush, and some analysts speculated that next month’s Lunar New Year, when many Chinese factories will idle, might be a moment for ports, warehouses and trucking companies to catch up on moving backlogged orders and allow global supply chains to return to normal.
Sunday, September 26, 2021
House Passes “Red Flag” Gun Confiscation Bill And 135 "Republicans" Voted For It...
Seizing firearms first and “getting the Due Process later” will never constitute sufficient Due Process, no matter how much anti-gunners may pretend it does.
135 Representatives That Do Not Understand How Red Flag Laws Will Be Abused To Illegally Confiscate Guns.
Who Are These Traitors?
REPRESENTATIVE | PARTY | STATE | VOTE |
Carl | Republican | Alabama | YEA |
Rogers (AL) | Republican | Alabama | YEA |
Young | Republican | Alaska | YEA |
Crawford | Republican | Arkansas | YEA |
Hill | Republican | Arkansas | YEA |
Westerman | Republican | Arkansas | YEA |
Womack | Republican | Arkansas | YEA |
Calvert | Republican | California | YEA |
Garcia (CA) | Republican | California | YEA |
Issa | Republican | California | YEA |
Kim (CA) | Republican | California | YEA |
McCarthy | Republican | California | YEA |
Nunes | Republican | California | YEA |
Obernolte | Republican | California | YEA |
Steel | Republican | California | YEA |
Valadao | Republican | California | YEA |
Lamborn | Republican | Colorado | YEA |
Bilirakis | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Buchanan | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Cammack | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Diaz-Balart | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Dunn | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Franklin, C. Scott | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Gaetz | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Gimenez | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Salazar | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Waltz | Republican | Florida | YEA |
Allen | Republican | Georgia | YEA |
Carter (GA) | Republican | Georgia | YEA |
Ferguson | Republican | Georgia | YEA |
Scott, Austin | Republican | Georgia | YEA |
Simpson | Republican | Idaho | YEA |
Bost | Republican | Illinois | YEA |
Davis, Rodney | Republican | Illinois | YEA |
Kinzinger | Republican | Illinois | YEA |
LaHood | Republican | Illinois | YEA |
Baird | Republican | Indiana | YEA |
Banks | Republican | Indiana | YEA |
Bucshon | Republican | Indiana | YEA |
Hollingsworth | Republican | Indiana | YEA |
Pence | Republican | Indiana | YEA |
Spartz | Republican | Indiana | YEA |
Walorski | Republican | Indiana | YEA |
Feenstra | Republican | Iowa | YEA |
Hinson | Republican | Iowa | YEA |
Miller-Meeks | Republican | Iowa | YEA |
LaTurner | Republican | Kansas | YEA |
Mann | Republican | Kansas | YEA |
Barr | Republican | Kentucky | YEA |
Guthrie | Republican | Kentucky | YEA |
Rogers (KY) | Republican | Kentucky | YEA |
Graves (LA) | Republican | Louisiana | YEA |
Johnson (LA) | Republican | Louisiana | YEA |
Letlow | Republican | Louisiana | YEA |
Scalise | Republican | Louisiana | YEA |
Bergman | Republican | Michigan | YEA |
McClain | Republican | Michigan | YEA |
Meijer | Republican | Michigan | YEA |
Moolenaar | Republican | Michigan | YEA |
Upton | Republican | Michigan | YEA |
Walberg | Republican | Michigan | YEA |
Stauber | Republican | Minnesota | YEA |
Kelly (MS) | Republican | Mississippi | YEA |
Graves (MO) | Republican | Missouri | YEA |
Hartzler | Republican | Missouri | YEA |
Long | Republican | Missouri | YEA |
Luetkemeyer | Republican | Missouri | YEA |
Wagner | Republican | Missouri | YEA |
Bacon | Republican | Nebraska | YEA |
Smith (NE) | Republican | Nebraska | YEA |
Amodei | Republican | Nevada | YEA |
Smith (NJ) | Republican | New Jersey | YEA |
Van Drew | Republican | New Jersey | YEA |
Garbarino | Republican | New York | YEA |
Jacobs (NY) | Republican | New York | YEA |
Katko | Republican | New York | YEA |
Malliotakis | Republican | New York | YEA |
Reed | Republican | New York | YEA |
Stefanik | Republican | New York | YEA |
Tenney | Republican | New York | YEA |
Cawthorn | Republican | North Carolina | YEA |
Foxx | Republican | North Carolina | YEA |
Hudson | Republican | North Carolina | YEA |
McHenry | Republican | North Carolina | YEA |
Murphy (NC) | Republican | North Carolina | YEA |
Rouzer | Republican | North Carolina | YEA |
Balderson | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Gibbs | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Gonzalez (OH) | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Johnson (OH) | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Joyce (OH) | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Latta | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Turner | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Wenstrup | Republican | Ohio | YEA |
Bice (OK) | Republican | Oklahoma | YEA |
Cole | Republican | Oklahoma | YEA |
Lucas | Republican | Oklahoma | YEA |
Bentz | Republican | Oregon | YEA |
Fitzpatrick | Republican | Pennsylvania | YEA |
Joyce (PA) | Republican | Pennsylvania | YEA |
Keller | Republican | Pennsylvania | YEA |
Kelly (PA) | Republican | Pennsylvania | YEA |
Meuser | Republican | Pennsylvania | YEA |
Reschenthaler | Republican | Pennsylvania | YEA |
Thompson (PA) | Republican | Pennsylvania | YEA |
Mace | Republican | South Carolina | YEA |
Wilson (SC) | Republican | South Carolina | YEA |
Johnson (SD) | Republican | South Dakota | YEA |
DesJarlais | Republican | Tennessee | YEA |
Fleischmann | Republican | Tennessee | YEA |
Green (TN) | Republican | Tennessee | YEA |
Harshbarger | Republican | Tennessee | YEA |
Kustoff | Republican | Tennessee | YEA |
Brady | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Carter (TX) | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Crenshaw | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Ellzey | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Fallon | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Gonzales, Tony | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Granger | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Jackson | Republican | Texas | YEA |
McCaul | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Pfluger | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Van Duyne | Republican | Texas | YEA |
Moore (UT) | Republican | Utah | YEA |
Wittman | Republican | Virginia | YEA |
Herrera Beutler | Republican | Washington | YEA |
Newhouse | Republican | Washington | YEA |
Rodgers (WA) | Republican | Washington | YEA |
McKinley | Republican | West Virginia | YEA |
Miller (WV) | Republican | West Virginia | YEA |
Fitzgerald | Republican | Wisconsin | YEA |
Gallagher | Republican | Wisconsin | YEA |
Steil | Republican | Wisconsin | YEA |
Cheney | Republican | Wyoming | YEA |
Tuesday, September 14, 2021
Joe Biden's Democrat great-great-great-grandfather owned a 14-year-old boy...
- Two of Joe Biden's 3x-great grandfathers owned slaves in Maryland
- The president has often touted his Irish Catholic roots, only a part of his lineage
- Biden also shares a small connection to Confederate President Jefferson Davis
- The story was adapted from a new book about the president titled The Bidens
- Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger penned the book coming out next week
- One chapter delves into Joe Biden's sometimes fraught history on race issues
- In one little-known incident, Biden actually lived in a deed-restricted home
- Covenant barred Delaware home from being 'owned or occupied by any Negro'
- Biden lived in the home from 1971 to 1974 as he launched his first Senate bid
- In 1986 Biden disavowed the racist restriction on the home purchased by his dad
Jesse Robinett, Biden's great-great-great grandfather, owned two enslaved people in Maryland in the 1800s, according to a Politico story adapted from a bombshell new book, The Bidens.
Biden shares an apparent connection with Robinett through his full name - Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.
Another ancestor of Biden's also reportedly owned a slave in Maryland - a 14-year-old boy. That 3x-great grandfather is Thomas Randle, who held the child in 1850 in Baltimore County, according to census records and slave schedules at the time.
Slave schedules and census records were two separate headcounts of slaves that were conducted in 1850 and 1860.
The damning family history was uncovered by Alexander Bannerman, a West Virginia genealogist who organized the first complete genealogy of Biden for publication.
Census records resurfaced by Bannerman show that by 1860, Randle and his family moved to a different area of Baltimore County. The slave schedule for the same year shows he again enslaved a man.
Biden also shares a 'distant tie' to the wife of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.
A new book has delved into President Joe Biden's sometimes fraught history on racial issues, revealing that in the 1970s he lived in a home with a racially restrictive deed
The genealogist revealed that Biden's distant ancestor Allen Robanet likely immigrated from England to Pennsylvania in the late 1600s. Robanet is his link to Davis' wife Varina Anne Banks Howell.
For someone with deep roots to colonial America, Bannerman said Biden's family records showed 'not a lot of ancestors, and not a lot of slaves.'
DailyMail.com has reached out to the White House for comment.
But it's a past that Biden has infrequently - if ever - mentioned.
By contrast, the only Irish Catholic president since John F. Kennedy regularly invokes his Irish Catholic roots. Some of his most regular anecdotes involve growing up amongst his mother's Irish Catholic family and going to Catholic school in Delaware.
The book by Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger is due out next week
More recently he quipped at an event celebrating the Jewish High Holidays, 'my daughter married a Jewish young man. And you know, dream of every Catholic father that she marry a Jewish doctor.'
But at several points during his career, during attempts to woo southern voters, Biden has also appeared to boast of Delaware's history as a 'slave state' - seemingly before he was aware of his family's ties to...
Wednesday, December 30, 2020
If you don't know history, then you don't know anything. You are a leaf that doesn't know it is part of a tree.
Michael Crichton Quote In The Title Of An Allen West Quote
More Crichton:
What Intoxicating Vanity
More West:
Allen West On The Left...
Monday, November 12, 2018
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Florida Gun Purchasing Laws Differ By County...
After the Orlando Islamic terrorist attack, many publications are reporting today that Florida only has a three day waiting period for purchasing handguns and no waiting period for purchasing a rifle.
I have always had to wait 5 business days for handguns and rifles, so what gives?
Apparently Florida Statutes allow the counties to impose their own rules on gun purchasing waiting periods.
In the three counties that make up South Florida: Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties; the waiting period for purchasing a gun is 5 days. This also applies to rifles, 5 business days in these three counties even though Florida Statute: 790.0655 Purchase and delivery of handguns; mandatory waiting period; exceptions; penalties states that the waiting period is three business days and immediate purchase for rifles.
If you have a concealed carry license, there is no waiting period in any county in Florida.
If you are not sure what the waiting period is in your county, the quickest way to find out is to call your local gun dealer, they of course are well versed on the local laws that affect and regulate their business.
On June 12th, 2016, Islamic Terrorist Omar Mateen, who lived in Port St. Lucie County, Murdered 49 innocent people in Orlando Florida (Orange County). He passed Federal Backgrounds checks to purchase a gun and worked as an armed security guard. Mateen purchased a handgun in Port St. Lucie County which has a three day waiting period for handguns and same day after background check for rifles. He waited significantly longer than 3 days to pick up his gun.
On June 12th, 2016, Islamic Terrorist Omar Mateen, who lived in Port St. Lucie County, Murdered 49 innocent people in Orlando Florida (Orange County). He passed Federal Backgrounds checks to purchase a gun and worked as an armed security guard. Mateen purchased a handgun in Port St. Lucie County which has a three day waiting period for handguns and same day after background check for rifles. He waited significantly longer than 3 days to pick up his gun.
More Florida Topics:
ALL 67 FLORIDA COUNTY SHERIFFS SIGN PLEDGE TO PROTECT THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO BEAR ARMS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)