90 Miles From Tyranny

Monday, February 19, 2018

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #172

You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?

It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,

from the beautiful to the repugnant,

from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,

you could be inspired, you could be appalled.

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.

You have been warned.

South Park Does Immigrants Explained

Girls With Guns

President Donald Trump shared a cartoon mocking CNN, a news network fueling the notion that the president’s campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election.

“The Fake News of big ratings loser CNN,” Trump wrote, retweeting a cartoon image of an old Wolf Blitzer searching for evidence of Russian collusion.

The caption of the cartoon was marked “CNN 2038,” as Blitzer announces “Update! We should see evidence of Russia-Trump collusion any day now.”

7h

Donald J. Trump

✔@realDonaldTrump

If it was the GOAL of Russia to create discord, disruption and chaos within the U.S. then, with all of the Committee Hearings, Investigations and Party hatred, they have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. They are laughing their asses off in Moscow. Get smart America!

Ivan Trumpovic@RrealDJTrump

pic.twitter.com/UNbXa0aWhJ

8:12 AM - Feb 18, 2018

6,549

3,158 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Blitzer did not respond on Twitter.

Can't Get Enough Fake News?

EWWW!!! I Stepped In Shit!

Is That True Or Did You Hear It On CNN?

16 Fake News Stories Reporters Have Run Since Trump Won

Superstar reporter warns 'fake news' panic is censorship trap

"Hard-Core Clinton Fanatic" Manufactured "Viral Fake News" That MSNBC Used To Discredit Wikileaks

Learn How To Fake Army Documents Online With Dan Rather At Udemy.com/danrather

REVEALED: The Real Fake News List

If You Don't Stop Lying, You'll Grow Up To Be A CNN Reporter!

5 Facts That Gun Grabbers Hate:

EXPOSED! Clinton pal STEALING votes from the military

Americans owe the military more than we could ever repay.

America’s two million soldiers and reservists risk life and limb to keep this nation safe, week in and week out, 365 days a year.

The least our country’s fighting men and women deserve is the right to vote. After all, who could be more qualified to choose our next commander-in-chief?

Now, a team of President Barack Obama and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton campaign cronies want to squash their votes – out of sour grapes for Donald Trump’s election!

The Center for American Progress released the report this Monday saying we have to make it harder for the military to vote in order to “protect future elections from interference by hostile nations such as Russia.”

The report, “Election Security in All 50 States,” wants to abolish a method of voting that many deployed soldiers rely on.

They claim that shadowy KGB agents will hack electronic votes – which, coincidentally, is how some U.S. soldiers vote from battle zones.

Instead CAP, which is funded by Clinton pal George Soros, recommends that “all voted ballots be returned by mail or delivered in person.”

That report is nothing but a blatant attempt to strip the military of the right to vote – a right that they protect for us.

Men in uniform who are serving overseas can’t just drop by their local town hall and deliver their cleanly marked ballots.

In fact, the local election board can be their greatest obstacle – especially if it’s located in a Democrat-controlled city.

Military paper ballots are supposed to be mailed 45 days before the election, to make sure the troops have plenty of time to fill them out, and get them postmarked before the mailing deadline.

Even in the best of circumstances, thousands don’t get counted.

But 40,000 ballots were mailed after the legal deadline in 2010. And the worst delay was in New York City and Illinois – the hometowns of Hillary and Obama.

Mailing a paper ballot isn’t even an option for some of our brave soldiers.

The Democrats “don’t believe someone who works on a submarine should be allowed to vote,” said Colorado’s Republican secretary of state, Wayne Williams. There’s no postal service underwater, CAP!

Voter fraud expert J. Christian Adams called the Democrats on their bald-faced hypocrisy. “CAP wants to make it easier for felons and criminals to vote, but wants to make it harder for fighting men and women overseas,” he said.

It’s no mystery why: The military votes overwhelmingly Republican in every single election.

In 2016, the military picked Trump over Hillary at least two-to-one.

Only 25 percent of soldiers would even think about casting a ballot for Hillary, according to the Military Times poll.

Almost as many voters said they would abstain from voting!

For one-in-five U.S. soldiers, would rather not vote at all than help Hillary get into the Oval Office.

The Democrats’ partisan motive couldn’t be any clearer. CAP was founded by none other than John Podesta.

Podesta was chief of staff for President Bill Clinton and chairman of Hillary’s 2016 presidential campaign.

His embarrassing e-mails were hacked and released by WikiLeaks in the waning days of the 2016 election. That move helped cost Hillary a rigged election that everybody thought she had in the bag.

Now he wants to make sure the military never has the chance to cost him another election, and a return trip to the White House.

Patriotic Americans of all parties have to put their country above politics. We have to make sure Soros’ left-wing plans to disenfranchise the military fail miserably. We have to make it easier for the military to vote – and for every vote...

A key agent who suddenly retired In February 2016 just may have left out of frustration with higher-ups covering things up

On October 13, 2015, Sen. Bernie Sanders graciously stole the show at a Democratic presidential debate when he exclaimed to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that “the American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails.”

At that moment, certain State Department officials and FBI agents must have concluded a fix was in. The Vermont Independent Socialist senator could not possibly have reached an informed conclusion, so he was either in the dark, or in the tank.

Well before the debates began, these government officials knew that crucial evidence suggested Clinton mishandled vast amounts of classified government information and had done so repeatedly, from Jan. 21, 2009. through Dec. 5, 2014, if not afterwards.

They knew because the Inspector General (IG) of the Intelligence Community issued a July 6, 2015, report that triggered a full-scale FBI investigation that opened four days later. The subject was mishandling of classified information and targets included Hillary Clinton and her key aides.

There Is Somebody Who Might Have Crucial Details

FBI veteran John Giacalone served as executive assistant director of the FBI from June 2014 through February 2016, working from Washington, D.C. headquarters. According to his Linkedin profile, during this period he “manage[d] the strategic risks associated with the FBI’s counterterrorism, counterintelligence and weapons of mass destruction programs in close coordination with domestic and international partners.”

Giacalone was also centrally involved in the FBI investigation into Clinton’s mishandling of classified information — a serious felony crime — and he resigned suddenly, for reasons not yet fully understood. Evidence now tumbling into the public domain suggests Giacalone may have exhausted his tolerance for a rigged inquiry late in January 2016.

Five days before the Iowa caucuses, on Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2016, a mysterious visitor arrived at FBI offices in Washington, D.C. “to present evidence of Hillary Clinton’s misuse of classified documents by putting them on an unclassified email system.”

The male visitor was described as: “…a long-time government employee [who] had previously worked for many years at the Department of State. He provided a resume and a U.S. Foreign Service Employee Evaluation Report to prove his bona fides.” Neither the name of the visitor nor that of the recorder of the FBI Vault report, starting on page 11, are known.

The document was written Feb. 22, 2016, 26 days after the unscheduled visit, approved by another as-yet unidentified person, and copied to Jonathan C. Moffa, Peter P. Strzok II, and a fourth unidentified person. The named individuals are controversial and the delay between the date of the visit and the date of the report is odd, all of which needs to be fully investigated.

Additional details contained in the report, and still unreleased portions of FBI Vault records likely will help explain why John Giacalone resigned.

Why a VIP FBI Probe ‘Went Sideways?’

Judge Andrew Napolitano reported in the Washington Times Oct. 26, 2106, that Giacalone retire in February 2016 in part because he was concerned the investigation was never given adequate resources, including subpoena powers.

The FBI Vault records referenced above appear to have been declassified on Nov. 10, 2016, not long after Napolitano’s report.

According to new FBI records, the visitor “explained … he had sent evidence of Hillary Clinton’s misuse of classified documents to the FBI Director earlier in January 2016, but, when he called to confirm receipt, he could not do so and therefore wanted to walk-in to make sure that the information was received by...