90 Miles From Tyranny

Friday, May 4, 2018

Satellite Images Reveal ‘Unusual Activity’ at Iran Nuclear Research Facility

Satellite from Israel indicates some “unusual activity” at Iran’s nuclear plant in Fordow, adding fuel to the suspicions of Tehran’s ongoing pursuits of nuke weaponry development.
Iran has denied for years its Fordow nuclear plant has been pursuing the development of weapons.

The satellite imagery shows activities that haven’t been seen in months.Satellite’s been picking up “unusual activity” at Fordow.

For instance, buses and large vehicles have been picked up moving in and out of the facility, driving toward newly constructed buildings that are believed to be research and development labs.

From i24 News:

Israeli satellite company iSi released several photos on Thursday indicating ‘unusual activity’ at a nuclear research facility in Iran from April 29, following weeks of speculation that US President Donald Trump might decide to leave the nuclear deal.

The satellite images show a number of activities at the Fordow nuclear research plant that haven’t been detected in recent months, such as a large presence of buses and vehicles, as well as new large buildings which iSi believe are for R&D (research and development) and assembly.

One of the satellite images shows an opened gate to the facility’s uranium enrichment tunnels, which the iSi says it has not observed in recent months.

However, on February 1, the spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), Behrouz Kamalvandi, said that “we are at the stage of installing some equipment and Russian experts will arrive in Iran on Sunday to begin the installation work.”

On the same day AP quoted Russia’s RIA Novosti news agency as saying that the Russians were set to arrive at the Fordow nuclear facility later that week.Tensions over the Iran deal culminated this week when Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed that Mossad has gathered intelligence which indicates that Iran is cheating on the deal.Netanyahu delivered a PowerPoint presentation, displaying thousands of original “incriminating” files part of half a ton of material from an archive of “Project Amad,” the name he said was given to “Iran’s comprehensive program to design, test and build nuclear weapons.”

“After signing the nuclear deal in 2015, Iran intensified its efforts to hide its secret files,” he argued.He blasted Iran for denying the existence of its nuclear program to the IAEA and for continuing to expand it after the 2015 JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), the formal name for the agreement with Iran.

On Thursday, Reuters reported that US President Donald Trump has essentially...

#gunrights

These Are The Two Cases In Which You Have Too Much Ammo:

Homeland Security Starts At Home...

What Does The AR In AR-15 Stand For?

There Are No Other Rights, If You Can't Defend Them...

When Any Nation Mistrusts Its Citizens...

ILLEGAL ALIEN RAPED 11-YEAR-OLD GIRL IN COLORADO

EAGLE COUNTY, CO (The Aspen Times) – A 30-year-old Eagle County man will spend 16 years in prison for sexually assaulting an 11-year-old girl.

Family members say Jose Hernan Delcid Guzman had a tough life before leaving El Salvador for the U.S. That’s tragic, but not particularly relevant, said District Court Judge Russell Granger. What is relevant is that Guzman knew what he was doing was wrong, Granger said.

“A 30-year old man has sexually assaulted an 11-year-old child. That’s a fact, and that’s not something the court can tolerate,” Granger said in passing sentence.

In a pre-sentence evaluation, Guzman said his offense would be legal in his native El Salvador. He also said he thought the girl was 16 or 17 years old.

Guzman pleaded guilty to sexual assault on a child. When he finishes his prison sentence, he will likely be deported, according to court testimony during a Monday hearing.

Whether Guzman was in the country legally could not be confirmed Monday through the courts or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Chief Deputy District Attorney Joe Kirwan asked for the maximum 16-year sentence, and got it.

The victim’s parents made written statements to the court. “I want him to go to prison so he can realize the harm he caused my family,” their statements read. “I asked him for an explanation. He said, ‘Sorry.’ That is not enough. This incident has affected our entire family in....

Bill Clinton’s Rape Accuser Unloads EPIC Truth Bomb on Hillary

Evil Supporting Evil...

This Is How The Media Covers All Democrats...

Egalitarianism Is Evil And Helps No one..

MSNBC Hits New Low, Pushes Idea Trump Has STD

It’s no secret that MSNBC has a strong liberal slant, but the network may have just devolved into complete parody.

During a “Morning Joe” segment that can only be described as an anti-Trump hate fest, hosts Mika Brzezinski and Elise Jordan set a new low for crass unprofessionalism when they implied on live television that the president of the United States might have a sexually transmitted disease.

The exchange started when MSNBC gleefully repeated insults against Trump that have allegedly been uttered by administration officials like John Kelly.

Clearly enjoying smearing the president, “Morning Joe” hosts reported the quotes even though most were unproven and came from questionable sources like BuzzFeed and the admittedly-embellished “Fire and Fury” book.

The discussion was about whether White House staff members who clash with the president would have a tough time continuing their careers afterward. That question was fair enough, but then Jordan purposely steered the debate into the gutter.

“You leave with the political equivalent of an STD — to talk about something that Donald Trump worries about constantly,” Jordan quipped.

Yes, a major news network just declared that the commander in chief has a sexually transmitted disease in order to make an analogy.

“It’s something that you just don’t get rid of very easily,” Jordan went on, hammering home her sick example.

There was a bit of chatter, and then Brzezinski decided to get in on the sleaze.

“Wait a minute,” she interjected. “Maybe that’s (an STD) why they raided his...

Alliance Defending Freedom has won seven cases at the U.S. Supreme Court in as many years, including one that upheld an Arizona school choice program and another that prevented the state of Missouri from discriminating against a Christian preschool.

The legal powerhouse, which fights for religious freedom, is awaiting decisions in two more landmark free speech cases it argued this term before the high court. It is counted as one of the most successful legal advocacy organizations in the country.

But even that stellar record was not enough to prevent Alliance Defending Freedom from being banned from participating in AmazonSmile, which allows Amazon.com customers to contribute “0.5% of eligible purchases” to “almost one million eligible 501(c)(3) public charitable organizations.”

ADF had been one of those charities since the 2013 launch of AmazonSmile until recently, when those who had assigned the legal organization as their charity were notified that it was no longer eligible.

The reason? Southern Poverty Law Center.

Those who had selected ADF as their charity received the following explanation of why they’d no longer be able to give to the religious freedom group through the program:

The AmazonSmile Participation Agreement states that certain categories of organizations are not eligible to participate in AmazonSmile. We rely on the Southern Poverty Law Center to determine which charities are in certain ineligible categories. You have been excluded from the AmazonSmile program because the Southern Poverty Law Center lists Alliance Defending Freedom in an ineligible category.

For those unfamiliar with SPLC, they are the hysteria-stokers responsible for producing a slanderous list of “hate groups” that lumps together actual violent extremists with respectable organizations such as Alliance Defending Freedom and the Family Research Council and with international human rights activists such as Maajid Nawaz and Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

So, the “ineligible category” to which Amazon’s statement refers is really nothing more than a hit list of groups and people SPLC disagrees with. Amazon’s decision to rely on the false accusations of ...