90 Miles From Tyranny

Friday, October 26, 2018

All You Need To Know About Democrats:

Illegal Immigration For Dummies...

One More Foot Would Have Been Sure Death...

More Amazing Gifs:

This Mugger Messed With The Wrong Woman...

Hair Catches Fire Amazingly Fast...

Waterbears can go without food or water for more than a decade.

Don't You Know That You Are A Shooting Star?

Wood You Please Find The Driver?

The North Korean Tiger Inspects His Assault Weapons...

I Want To Ride My Bicycle...Maybe Not...

Still Have A Few Firecrackers Left Over?

"And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!"

The Tragedy Of Alcohol Abuse...

NBC News Hid Information that Would Have Cleared Kavanaugh of Rape Allegations

NBC News deliberately hid vital information that would have helped clear Brett Kavanaugh of the serial rape allegations Julie Swetnick and her attorney, Michael Avenatti, leveled against him.

On September 16, Kavanaugh and his loved ones were dropped into a pit of hell due to allegations of sexual assault from Christine Blasey Ford. Although her story quickly fell apart during public testimony, for the three-plus weeks that would follow, in an effort to derail his confirmation, Democrats and their allies in the establishment media did everything in their power to personally destroy this man as a drunken serial rapist.

NBC News and Avenatti played a huge role in this obscene smear campaign. One notable example was NBC breathlessly publishing and airing an assault allegation against Kavanaugh that was quickly exposed as a hoax. NBC did not even bother to independently corroborate this allegation prior to airing it. A Democrat handed NBC the smear, and NBC ran with it.

To make matters worse, we now know NBC News withheld crucial information that undermined the allegations made by Swetnick, the Avenatti client who accused a high school-aged Kavanaugh of spiking punch bowls at house parties so he and his buddies could engage in serial rapes.

And we know NBC deliberately withheld this crucial information because NBC is now admitting it had this information all the way back on September 30.

On September 30, a week prior to Kavanaugh’s confirmation, during the most intense days of this scandal, when Kavanaugh’s confirmation was still very much in doubt, here is what NBC did not want the public to know…

If you recall, although he withheld the name, Avenatti tweeted out a sworn statement from a woman who backed up Swetnick’s outrageous rape allegations. In her statement, this second woman swore that she, too, had witnessed Kavanaugh spike punch bowls and take sexual advantage of girls.

Well, unbeknownst to us, NBC interviewed this anonymous witness on September 30, and she recanted!

But only now is NBC News bothering to...

And We Get To Support Them With Our Hard Earned Tax Dollars.

Rep. Steve Scalise Calls for New York Times to Remove Trump Assassination Short Story

The New York Times should take down and apologize for a short story about assassinating President Donald Trump, House Majority Whip Steve Scalise told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“The media needs to take accountability for the role they are playing in promoting dangerous rhetoric and division in this country, particularly against President Trump and his supporters,” Scalise, R-La., said Thursday in a statement. “The decision by The New York Times to run this piece is irresponsible and offensive, and they should remove it and apologize.”

The Times published a short story Tuesday about the assassination of Trump, just one day before “potential explosive devices” showed up addressed to high-profile Democrats including former President Barack Obama.

English thriller novelist Zoë Sharp wrote the short story, titled “How It Ends,” about a Russian assassin on a suicide mission who receives help from a Secret Service agent to kill Trump. A character who is working with the Russians in the story implies that Trump “was handpicked at the highest possible level” and must be silenced.

The New York Times had prompted novelists “to conjure possible outcomes” to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election for a Tuesday piece.

Scalise has spoken out about dangerous tensions in the nation since he was seriously wounded by a would-be assassin in 2017.

“These attempted attacks that have been made are beyond criminal, they are acts of pure terror. Violence and terror have no place in our politics or anywhere else in our society,” Scalise wrote on Twitter Wednesday after multiple high-profile political figures had pipe bomb scares.

“I have experienced first-hand the effects of political violence, and am committed to using my voice to speak out against it wherever...

FAKE NEWS: CNN Caught Reporting White House Bomb That Doesn't Even Exist

CNN "reporters" including Jake Tapper and Evan Perez issued detailed reports Wednesday about an explosive device “with projectiles” that was sent to the White House, despite there being no such device.

The false information peddled by CNN caused panic in the White House, wondering if CNN had inside information about a potential bomb plot, as many people were reminded of the BBC reporting the collapse of World Trade Center 7 approximately twenty minutes before it actually collapsed on 9/11.

The false reports by CNN also forced the Secret Service to issue a public statement urging calm and describing Jake Tapper’s report as “incorrect.”

While the existence of at least ten “bombs” has been confirmed by law enforcement officials, CNN reporters chose to give detailed reports about a bomb that was supposedly addressed to the White House.

CNN anchor Jake Tapper issued a tweet – that was deleted shortly after – saying:

“Another suspicious package with a device addressed to the White House was intercepted at Joint Base Bolling in Washington, DC. According to a law enforcement official, the device was similar to ones sent to homes of Soros, Clintons and Obamas.“

Minutes after the Secret Service published a tweet correcting CNN’s fake news, Jake Tapper deleted his tweet without explanation or apology.

What raises suspicions even further, however, is that CNN’s Evan Perez also tweeted about the non-existent White House addressed explosive, yet this time with even more detail about the device itself.

Perez’s tweet – that was also deleted shortly after being published – said:

“The devices appear to be rudimentary but functional. The White House-addressed device also contained projectiles.”

Given the frantic nature of the news cycle on Wednesday, perhaps we could explain away one false report as an innocent mistake, but two of them — and both of them from a renowned fake news outlet that also received a “bomb” on the same day?

And why so much fake detail if they just had their wires crossed?

Is this just another one of the left’s “wild coincidences?” Or is there something...

You would end up paying more taxes AND College would get more expensive if much of the bill is on the Government dime.

President Trump May Take Extraordinary Action Against Illegal Migrant Horde, Say Media Reports

Media reports say that President Donald Trump may use his extraordinary power over immigration to temporarily freeze the asylum laws which are inviting the migrant exodus from Central America.

The dramatic exercise of Trump’s border power is being considered as the caravan of poor Honduran migrants slowly heads towards the California border. Officials are still trying to game out the likely consequences, including interventions by progressive judges, media outrage, and hostility from the Mexican government.

Also, the caravan is just a small part of the illegal migration problem, most of which is caused by the cartels’ labor-trafficking businesses. Overall migration has escalated in 2018 partly because judges have repeatedly blocked Trump’s agency reforms, while Congress has refused Trump’s reform bills and refused to fund his border programs, including the wall. The establishment media and business groups have also bitterly opposed any reforms which reduce migration.

But the White House debate is also taking place just two weeks from election day, as Democrats try to shift the public’s attention away from the costs of cheap-labor migration towards the Democrats’ pitch on healthcare and apparent bomb-threats.

The White House is likely to release more information on Friday.

The multiple media reports were vague and closely timed as if a few officials — either pro-Trump or anti-Trump — leaked the reports of the pending executive action to either grab headlines or block the planned action.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported:

The Trump administration is considering an executive action that could use travel ban-like authority to block certain asylum seekers at the Mexican border, sources familiar with the discussions said Thursday.

First, Homeland Security and the Justice Department would issue a rule limiting immigrants’ ability to seek asylum if they are part of a population barred by the president. The rule would take effect immediately, unlike most, and be justified as an extraordinary situation.

That would clear the way for Trump to issue a proclamation directed at a specific population, expected to target the 7,000-plus Central Americans heading toward the U.S.

The Washington Post reported:

Fixated on the migrant caravan moving north through Mexico, President Trump is weighing a plan to shut the U.S. border to Central Americans and deny them the opportunity to seek asylum, asserting similar emergency powers used during the early 2017 “travel ban,” according to administration officials and people familiar with..

White guy confronts black Trump supporter about his MAGA hat and knocks it off his head! This is assault.

This guy needs to identified before he really hurts somebody! pic.twitter.com/miOvbrJWdt
— Ex-Dem🇺🇸Latina (@ExDemLatina) October 25, 2018

Hispanics Flip the Script When Univision Asks About Honduran Caravan

You've probably heard the narrative in one form or another: If you support border enforcement, you’re a horrible racist and probably hate Hispanics.

That implication has never been stronger than right now, as a nearly 10,000-strong caravan of migrants streams north from Central America through Mexico and toward the United States.

The establishment media’s reporting has had both overt and veiled references to racism, with the implication being that anyone who agrees with President Trump — that the migrants should not be allowed to illegally enter America — must be horrible bigots.

But as Univision just found out, that argument just doesn't hold water — especially when other Hispanics are the ones objecting to open borders.

During a segment from reporter Luis Megid on the Spanish-language and often anti-Trump cable channel, several Hispanic Americans were asked for their thoughts on the caravan. It didn’t go how Univision expected.

“How is it possible that a caravan from Central America is on its way to the U.S. and the people are speaking the way they’re speaking, demanding to get in?” responded one Hispanic man in fluent Spanish.

“No sir, this isn’t their country and they need to respect it,” he pointed out.

Another Hispanic man who Univision said was in Florida echoed similar sentiments. “Entering the U.S. illegally? There’s a process. We’re a country of laws,” he pointed out.

“Like the president says, they can come here, but they need to come here legally like the rest of us,” declared a Hispanic woman.

Even a Honduran woman named Carla, who said she entered the U.S. in a previous caravan, told Univision that she’s changed her view after seeing the huge number of people breaking through border crossings and continuing north.

“With so many people I see it as complicated,” she explained. “It’s not right that so many people are heading to the U.S. in...