90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Yes You Do...Yes You Do...







The DNC Promised Answers On Keith Ellison's Domestic Abuse Allegations -- They're Doing The Exact Opposite

Vote Red For This Reason:


This Is How You Make America Great Again!


Californians Know What Is Best For Georgians...Really...


We Need A New Mosaic! Make Them Cry Today!



WE NEED CRYING LEFTISTS TODAY.

This Is The Time...And This Is The Record Of The Time...



It Is Time To Vote. Stop Whatever You Are Doing. Go Vote.


This Is Why You Need To Vote Today And Vote Red!


19-year-old Muslim migrant ‘RAPES TEACHER at Swedish high school after threatening to kidnap her family if she did not have sex with him’

(Pamela comments:)
Of course, his devout family defended the 19-year-old rapist, claiming that the rape “may have been a misunderstanding between her and him.” Yes she obviously hadn’t read the Quran — the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must (eventually) win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

‘My son is not like that. We are a traditional family, and he would never do something like that,’ the mother of the suspect told Expressen.

Uh huh.

Story:
  • Teenage student charged with raping a teacher at a high school in Sweden
  • The 19-year-old from Syria had allegedly threatened teacher on Snapchat
  • Media reports he said he’d kidnap someone in her family if she didn’t comply
  • Prosecutors claim he locked teacher in a room and sexually assaulter her

A 19-year-old man from Syria has been charged with raping a teacher at a high school in southern Sweden.

The teenage student allegedly pushed the mother-of-two into a room, locked the door and sexually assaulted her at the school in Nässjö, near Jönköping.

In the weeks before the incident, the student allegedly sexually harassed the teacher, after which he sent her a Snapchat message in which he threatened to rape her, court documents reveal.

Prosecutors claim the student said he would kidnap someone in the woman’s family if she did not comply and have sex with him, Smalands Dagblad reports.

Allegations: The high school teacher claims the 19-year-old student pushed her into a room at the school in Nässjö, southern Sweden, and sexually assaulted her.

After the alleged attack took place in mid-September, the alleged victim, who is in her 30s, wrote about the incident on her blog, stating ‘a no is a no’.

‘And no, it doesn’t matter that you have an amazing figure. No, it doesn’t matter that your clothes are sexy and tight. No, it doesn’t matter that you know the person. No, it doesn’t matter that no one else saw it or heard it. A no is a f***ing no.’

She writes in the blog, which has since been made inaccessible, how she tried to fight back, begged the attacker to stop and that she felt ‘like a fragile bunny that the hunter was about to shoot with his gun.’

She also claimed that the attacker, whom she does not identify, had told her he had assaulted her ‘because my body was so irresistable [sic]. So curvy, so sexy, so hot that you just had to...

Your Choice, Mobs Or Jobs?


HOW TO MAKE MONEY STOPPING ILLEGAL ALIEN CARAVANS

If you think immigration enforcement is expensive, try not enforcing it.

There are over 12,000 American military personnel stationed in Italy. It’s a larger active-duty military presence than Afghanistan. We maintain seven bases in Italy at a cost of billions of dollars.

But as President Trump dispatched a mere 5,000 troops, the first wave of a reported 15,000, to secure the border against the migrant caravan invasion, the media threw a tantrum over the cost.

The Washington Post warned darkly that the deployment could cost as much as... $200 million. That would be more impressive if our annual defense budget weren’t hovering around $600 billion.

And those are only the parts that we know about.

To put that into perspective, President Trump has proposed that we spend 0.03% of our military budget on the core mission of the military, protecting our own borders from an invasion. It’s as if he had suggested that we spend at least 0.03% of NASA’s budget on space exploration, instead of global warming and Muslim self-esteem, or 0.03% of the Department of Education’s budget on education instead of on closely monitoring the sexual habits and Halloween costumes of college students.

Deploying soldiers abroad is far more expensive than deploying them at home. And it’s a lot cheaper to stop drug dealers, gang members and terrorists at the border than it is inside the country.

What does $200 million buy us when it comes to national defense?

$200 million is being spent on special glasses and goggles for pilots to protect their eyes from laser devices fired into cockpits. We spend around $260 million on military bands. The military ad budget is in the high hundreds of millions of dollars.

We’re spending $200 million on military aid to Ukraine. If we can spend that much money to help the Ukrainians keep the Russians away, perhaps we can spend some that money to keep gang members and drug dealers out of our own backyard. The Russians are a menace, but they won’t be chopping up our children with machetes tomorrow. The MS-13 thugs riding along in that caravan just might.

If the media really has a problem with that, let its talking heads pretend that the caravan is Russian.

Every dollar we spend on border security is a fortune we don’t have to spend on police officers, surveillance cameras, insurance, ER visits, prisons, funerals and the larger sense of insecurity.

Let’s put that $200 million into its proper perspective.

An audit this year found that the Defense Logistics Agency couldn't account for $800 million in construction projects.

The money that President Trump may end up spending to protect our border from an invasion could fit four times over into a government accounting error.

None of this is to suggest that the work the military does at home and abroad isn’t vitally important. We should be protecting our pilots; military bands serve a vital purpose and so does our presence in Italy.

But if we don’t have a country, then it doesn’t matter how good our military bands are.

If there’s no United States of America, then why bother having seven bases in Italy? Why does the political establishment expect taxpayers to spend a fortune on geopolitics, but not on the home-front?

The purpose of the United States military is not to protect Italy, it’s to protect America. We built bases and stationed forces across Europe, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and South America for our own needs.

If we can’t use our own soldiers to protect our own country, what is the whole thing for?

While the media is notoriously parsimonious with the military budget, Obama’s presidential center will cost taxpayers $199 million. Throw in another million and that’s the cost of keeping more gang members from reaching Chicago and boosting the summer weekend death toll from...

Remember On You Can Prevent Democrats From Getting Into Office!


President Trump Brutally Destroys CNN Day Before Election

President Donald Trump just torched CNN and the Democrats the network campaigns for by accusing them of working to rig the midterm elections.

The president tore into the network’s election eve polls which, he believes, are being used to suppress the Republican vote.

He also warned Democrats that if they attempt their scam of illegal voting law enforcement would be watching, The Daily Mail reported.

President Donald Trump suggested Monday that CNN’s final pre-Election Day congressional poll is an example of a ‘suppression poll’ designed to persuade Republicans that voting on Tuesday would be a pointless effort.

The CNN survey found that Democratic candidates hold a whopping 13-point edge over their GOP opponents when voters are asked who they plan to support.

A Politico/Morning Consult poll released at the exact same time found that gap at only 3 points. Another from ABC News on Sunday put the margin at 8.

‘So funny to see the CNN Fake Suppression Polls and false rhetoric. Watch for real results Tuesday,’ the president tweeted.

‘We are lucky CNN’s ratings are so low. Don’t fall for the Suppression Game. Go out & VOTE. Remember, we now have perhaps the greatest Economy (JOBS) in the history of our Country!’

The CNN and ABC polls sampled self-identified ‘likely voters.’ Politico’s survey included registered voters, whether or not they said they were likely to vote.
So funny to see the CNN Fake Suppression Polls and false rhetoric. Watch for real results Tuesday. We are lucky CNN’s ratings are so low. Don’t fall for the Suppression Game. Go out & VOTE. Remember, we now have perhaps the greatest Economy (JOBS) in the history of our Country!
Law Enforcement has been strongly notified to watch closely for any ILLEGAL VOTING which may take place in Tuesday’s Election (or Early Voting). Anyone caught will be subject to the Maximum Criminal Penalties allowed by law. Thank you!
According to CNN’s pollsters, the GOP’s 13-point gap is largely the product of a 62-35 margin with women. Republicans have a single-point edge among men.
Eighty-eight per cent of black voters and 66 per cent of Latino voters also favor Democrats, according to CNN.

An average of polls maintained by Real Clear Politics gives Democrats a 7.3 per cent advantage. The only recent poll to put Republicans ahead is Rassmussen Reports, whole results predicted the 2016 election’s outcome better than those of every TV network and nearly every national newspaper.

It’s possible that Democrats’ national lead is concentrated in asmall number of districts where they hold such enormous sway that Republicans seldom contest congressional seats.

A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll released over the weekend showed that Democrats have only a 3-point lead, on average, in congressional races that are considered...