Wednesday, October 23, 2019
2 Proud Boys Get 4 Years In Prison Each For Defending Themselves Against Antifa
Two Proud Boys members were sentenced to four years in prison for defending themselves against antifa.
Two Proud Boys Sentenced to Four Years in Prison Each for Fighting Back Against Antifa thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/two-pr…
From The Gateway Pundit:
Two members of the Proud Boys have been sentenced for four years in prison for fighting back against Antifa by a Manhattan judge.
Maxwell Hare, 27, and John Kinsman, 40, had got into a fight with members of Antifa that were protesting a speech at the Metropolitan Republican Club by Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes.
“Both defendants faced as much as 15 years. They were convicted last August at trial of attempted gang assault, attempted assault and riot stemming from the Oct. 12, 2018, melee,” the New York Post reports.
Judge Mark Dwyer compared the fight to political brawls in “1930s Europe” as his reason for such a harsh sentence. During sentencing, he said “I know enough about history to know what happened in Europe in the ’30s when political street brawls were allowed to go ahead, we don’t want that to happen in New York.”
“The judge basically called me Hitler,” McInnes told the Gateway Pundit.
Beyond parody.
FOUR YEARS IN PRISON FOR DEFENDING CONSERVATIVES FROM ANTIFA THUGS.— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) October 22, 2019
Republicans cannot get fair-play Anglo-Saxon Law in liberal jurisdictions. The country needs to split up.https://t.co/g90xYderj6
As a reminder, antifa outside their event were calling for them to be killed:
Pierre Delecto Is In Flagrante Delicto
Timeline: Mitt Romney’s History of Backstabbing Donald Trump
Mitt Romney Cozies Up to Pelosi on Impeachment
How Is Junior Senator Mitt Romney Just Like Stormy Daniels...
Select All Images That Contain A U.S. President:
Worries grow over the Fed’s efforts to fix funding issues: ‘This is all likely to get much worse’
- Federal Reserve officials have been working feverishly to address issues that popped up more than a month ago in the overnight bank lending market.
- The central bank last week started a new bond-buying program that is expected to grow its balance sheet by $60 billion a month to start.
- J.P. Morgan Chase analysts, among others, worry that recent additional hiccups in overnight lending are symptoms of bigger problems that will grow worse as the year comes to a close.
The central bank has been working feverishly to address issues that popped up more than a month ago in the repo market, the overnight lending place where banks go to borrow money from each other. A cash crunch led to a spike in several rates, leading the Fed to institute programs to maintain proper liquidity levels.
While the effort has worked fairly well so far — rates rose last week, though not nearly as much as in mid-September — finance professionals fear that the market problems are not fixed and funding issues can happen again.
“The repo market has been drugged into submission by the Fed,” said Jim Bianco, head of Bianco Research. “That’s fine for a while. But what I am getting concerned about is that they’re not figuring a way to get it off the drug and get it back to normal, and that will be a problem longer term for them.”
Investors have long complained about the Fed hand-holding the market, injecting trillions of dollars in liquidity and keeping interest rates artificially low during and after the financial crisis.
This is a different situation, though.
Rather than looking to goose the economy back to health, the Fed is now using its balance sheet to make sure banks have enough reserves and an adequate amount of capital is flowing through the system to keep things...
Transgender Activist Who Tried to Force Beauticians to Wax Male Genitalia Loses Case
Females can’t be forced to wax hairy balls.
Transgender activist Jessica Yaniv, who accused three women of “discrimination” when they refused to wax Yaniv’s male genitalia, has lost the case.
Yaniv filed complaints with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal against the female aestheticians for their refusal to wax his balls.
He subsequently bragged about getting a cosmetics store shut down after it refused to provide the same service.
However, a Canadian official has ruled against Yaniv, saying women have the right to refuse to wax male genitalia.
“Human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax. … There are differences between waxing the genitals of a person with a vulva and a person with a penis and scrotum,” said the deciding official in the quasi-judicial British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
However, “The 61-page decision implies that women will have to provide the intimate service to men if the Canadian licensing boards require cosmeticians to learn how to do the service,” writes Neil Munro.
Human rights lawyer Devyn Cousineau said he “generally” agreed with Yaniv that refusing to provide services based on their...
Stephen Miller pushback: ‘Permanent bureaucracy a mortal threat to America’
Anonymous efforts by anti-Trump federal bureaucrats to thwart the White House agenda through leaks and complaints to friendly reporters and congressional allies are a “mortal threat” to democracy and the 2016 election results, according to a top administration official.
“This is a mortal threat to the American system of government,” said Stephen Miller, the senior adviser for policy.
In 2016, President Trump ran against Washington’s “deep state” and “permanent bureaucracy,” said Miller, and they remain so angry that they are lying, leaking, and attacking the administration’s agenda.
The latest example is the planned book written by an anonymous inside critic and that follows efforts by bureaucrats to thwart Trump policies with leaks to liberal media and Democrats on Capitol Hill.
In an interview, Miller called inside attacks a “very grave threat,” and he explained it this way:
“It is best understood as career federal employees that believe they are under no obligation to honor, respect, or abide by the results of a democratic election. Their view is, ‘If I agree with what voters choose, then I’ll do what they choose. If I disagree with what voters choose, then I won’t, and I’ll continue doing my own thing. So basically it’s heads I win, tails you lose.
“‘If you elect Hillary Clinton, then I’ll implement all of her policies very faithfully, and if I see massive evidence of corruption on Hillary Clinton’s part, then I’ll keep it all a secret. If you elect a candidate I disagree with, then I’ll lie, I’ll leak, I’ll cheat, I’ll smear, I’ll attack, I’ll persecute, and I will refuse to implement, and I will obstruct at every single step of the way.’”
But, said Miller, Trump’s most loyal nonfamily staffer who also worked on the 2016 election, said that the president isn’t “cowed” by the attacks. In fact, he said the criticisms steel the president.
“We’ve made clear that your leaks will backfire and your sabotage will fail, and we’ll simply implement the policy doubly,” he said. “Not only will you not change the outcome, but the more that you try to leak and disrupt, the more determined the president will be in his course to accomplish that which he was sent here to...
Study Finds the Wealthy & Celebrities Aren’t Changing Their Flying Habits to Reduce CO2 Emissions
Some are responsible for a thousand times more CO2 emissions than the average.
A new study by Swedish academics has found that most wealthy people and celebrities are not changing their flying habits to help reduce climate change, with some responsible for a thousand times more CO2 emissions than the average.
Imagine my shock.
The study, carried out by researchers from from Lund University, reviewed the social media accounts of well known celebrities and wealthy philanthropists, many of who relentlessly virtue signal about climate change.
Based on the information posted relating to travel, researchers calculated the starting point and destination for flights and then worked out likely CO2 emissions.
Climate activist Bill Gates was responsible for approximately 1,600 tonnes of carbon dioxide, while flights used by Paris Hilton and Jennifer Lopez emitted 1,260 tonnes and 1,050 tonnes respectively.
These figures compare to a global average of 100 kilos per person per year for air travel, or in other words more than a thousand times higher.
According to the researchers, only a minority of the individuals studied have altered their behavior to minimize or stop flying.
“Their lifestyles are norm-setting and identity-building. Above all, young people dream of traveling around the world in a similar way, without having to...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)