Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
CBS Sides with China Commies Over America, Peddles Piles of Fake News on Coronavirus
From the newscast that brought you the infamous Bill and Hillary Clinton interview, Dan Rather’s fake news on George W. Bush, and one Obama love letter after another, CBS’s 60 Minutes added a new chapter Sunday to its embarrassing history by peddling Chinese coronavirus propaganda.
Throughout the lengthy report, Scott Pelley dutifully touted one piece of fake news after the next, including a deceptively-edited clip of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (hours after NBC had their own kerfuffle).
Pelley largely relied on EcoHealth head Peter Daszak, who’s worked with (and defended) the Wuhan Institute of Virology to peddle the tiresome premise that scientists aren’t political and only want facts.
The nonsense started from the get-go as Pelley bemoaned EcoHealth losing an NIH grant as “the kind of politics which might seem ill-advised in a health crisis” and that “President Trump is blaming China’s government for the pandemic.”
Our friend Ryan Saavedra had a devastating takedown at the Daily Wire and began with Pelley’s cowardice in downplaying China’s failures: “Both the White House and the Chinese Communist Party have been less than honest and so, in China, and in the U.S., the work of scientists like Peter Daszak is being undercut by pandemic politics.”
For the sake of space, be sure to check out Saavedra’s entire piece, including his ten-point takedown of the above claim.
Pelley ensured that China wasn’t the villain, but instead were the President, Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL), and Newsmax’s Emerald Robinson.
To reiterate because it’s so farcical, EcoHealth and the Wuhan lab were painted as Avengers looking out for mankind (even though the initial genetic sequence was made available in January)
DASZAK: We’re a nonprofit research organization that focuses on understanding where the pandemics come from, what’s the risk of future pandemics and can we get in between this pandemic and the next one and disrupt it and stop it.
PELLEY: In China, EcoHealth has worked for fifteen years with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Together they’ve catalogued hundreds of bat viruses, research that is critical right now.
DASZAK: The breakthrough drug, Remdesivir, that seems to have some impact on COVID-19 was actually tested against the viruses we’ve discovered under our NIH research funding.
PELLEY: And so that testing would not have been possible ---
DASZAK: No, it would not.
PELLEY: --- if it hadn’t been for the work that you did with the NIH grant?
DASZAK: Correct.
PELLEY: But his funding from the NIH, the U.S. National Institutes of Health, was killed two weeks ago by a political disinformation campaign targeting China’s Wuhan Institute.
(….)
PELLEY: On April 14th, Florida Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz claimed China’s Wuhan Institute had, "birthed a monster." Gaetz is a vigorous defender of the President. He’s been under investigation by the House Ethics Committee for allegedly threatening a witness against Mr. Trump and he led a protest to delay impeachment testimony.
GAETZ: The NIH gives this $3.7 million grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They then advertise that they need coronavirus researchers. Following that, coronavirus erupts in Wuhan.
PELLEY: There never was a $3.7 million U.S. grant to the Wuhan lab. But the falsehoods spread like a virus in the White House, and without verification, in the briefing room.
ROBINSON: There’s also another report that the NIH, under the Obama administration, in 2015 gave that lab 3.7 million dollars in a grant. Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?
(….)
DASZAK: [T]he idea is that we know that viruses that affect people and pandemics tend to come from wildlife, so our strategy is to go to the wildlife source, find out where the viruses are, and try and shift behaviors like hunting and killing wildlife that would lead to the next outbreak. We also get the information into vaccine and drug developers so they can design better drugs. Expand
Saavedra also exposed how, again, Daszak and Pelley lied as the above parties were citing an April 11 Daily Mail item, so it wasn’t conceived on the dark web.
It should also be stated that Gaetz’s impeachment actions had nothing to do with the virus.
Next, Pelley almost did the right thing in citing a Washington Post column detailing concerns U.S. Embassy staff made two years ago (in a diplomatic cable) about the lab’s safety protocols.
Sadly, he chose to stay a Chinese Communist Party hack by boasting that they “the cable….emphasized the Wuhan Institute is critical to future outbreak prediction and prevention.”
Josh Rogin’s Post column cited a U.S. official who summarized the cable as “begging people to pay attention to what was going on,” so that sure doesn’t sound like everything’s squeaky clean.
Pelley tacked on a throwaway line about a key doctor who “was silenced by local officials” before dying from the virus, but that’s as far as Pelley went. He then pivoted back to Trump-bashing, trusting China’s official death toll, and misleading viewers on Pompeo’s statements about...
The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #286
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #985
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Monday, May 11, 2020
Cotton: Publicly Available Cell Phone Data Suggests Roads Around Wuhan Lab Were Closed in Mid-October
Sunday, during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) highlighted how cell phone data suggests the Chinese government had closed the roads around the Wuhan Institute of Virology in mid-October.
This is significant, as Cotton points out, that some believe the Wuhan facility is the origin of the COVID-19 virus.
“Reports emerged yesterday in the media that publicly available cell phone data suggests that roads around the lab in Wuhan was closed in the middle of October,” he said. “Again, this information is publicly available. American media has used it to analyze mobility patterns in states to see if our people are practicing social distancing. So the reports indicate that on major roads around these labs, Wuhan, you obviously had thousands and thousands of cell phones pinging towers day in and day out. And then, all of a sudden, it stopped. And it remained stopped for several days. That would suggest, without any further information, that those roads were blocked for some reason.”
“Now, we need to go confirm that,” Cotton continued. “We need to look at the data carefully. We also need to try to use other means to verify if there were, in fact, shutdowns of roads around those labs in the middle of October. The Chinese Communist Party could obviously help us with that if they would open up and allow us to investigate what happened in Wuhan. But if it is confirmed that roads around that lab were shut down for a number of days in mid-October, it is highly coincidental that there was a major shutdown of those roads at about the time one might have expected this virus to first get transmitted to humans, whatever the origins may have been. But this would be another piece of circumstantial evidence that there was some kind of accident or outbreak from those labs, not from the seafood market or anywhere else. That’s why it’s so important we get to the bottom of this data.”
As Cotton explains, Wuhan is larger than New York City, and closing roads as the government had would require a significant reason.
“Remember, Wuhan is a city that is larger than New York City. So, obviously, its roads are highly trafficked and heavily congested. So to shut down roads around the lab would suggest that they had...
This is significant, as Cotton points out, that some believe the Wuhan facility is the origin of the COVID-19 virus.
“Reports emerged yesterday in the media that publicly available cell phone data suggests that roads around the lab in Wuhan was closed in the middle of October,” he said. “Again, this information is publicly available. American media has used it to analyze mobility patterns in states to see if our people are practicing social distancing. So the reports indicate that on major roads around these labs, Wuhan, you obviously had thousands and thousands of cell phones pinging towers day in and day out. And then, all of a sudden, it stopped. And it remained stopped for several days. That would suggest, without any further information, that those roads were blocked for some reason.”
“Now, we need to go confirm that,” Cotton continued. “We need to look at the data carefully. We also need to try to use other means to verify if there were, in fact, shutdowns of roads around those labs in the middle of October. The Chinese Communist Party could obviously help us with that if they would open up and allow us to investigate what happened in Wuhan. But if it is confirmed that roads around that lab were shut down for a number of days in mid-October, it is highly coincidental that there was a major shutdown of those roads at about the time one might have expected this virus to first get transmitted to humans, whatever the origins may have been. But this would be another piece of circumstantial evidence that there was some kind of accident or outbreak from those labs, not from the seafood market or anywhere else. That’s why it’s so important we get to the bottom of this data.”
As Cotton explains, Wuhan is larger than New York City, and closing roads as the government had would require a significant reason.
“Remember, Wuhan is a city that is larger than New York City. So, obviously, its roads are highly trafficked and heavily congested. So to shut down roads around the lab would suggest that they had...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)