90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Thursday, May 28, 2020

Girls With Guns


Never Again Assholes...



Pop Goes The Weasels



Minneapolis Looters Savagely Attack Disabled Woman in Wheelchair


Trump Campaign On Fighting Leftist Social Media Hegemony....





'Voter fraud'? California man finds 83 ballots stacked outside home








Jerry Mosna was gardening outside his San Pedro, Calif., home Saturday when he noticed something odd: Two stacks of 2016 ballots on his mailbox.

The 83 ballots, each unused, were addressed to different people, all supposedly living in his elderly neighbor’s two-bedroom apartment.

“I think this is spooky,” Mosna said. “All the different names, none we recognize, all at one address.”

related: Up to 15% of Noncitizens in US Are Voting, Alleges Expert

His wife, Madalena Mosna, noted their 89-year-old neighbor lives by herself, and, “Eighty people can’t fit in that apartment.”

They took the ballots to the Los Angeles Police Department, but were directed to the post office. They felt little comfort there would be an investigation, and called another neighbor, John Cracchiolo – who contacted the Los Angeles County Registrar's office.

A spokeswoman for the Registrar said the office will investigate. Both Cracchiolo and Jerry Mosna told FoxNews.com they think they stumbled upon a case of fraud.

“Yes, there is voter fraud. We saw it with our own eyes,” Cracchiolo said.

In a statement, the office of the Registrar said, “We are carefully reviewing our records and gathering information to fully identify what took place. Our preliminary assessment is that this appears to be an isolated situation related to a system error that occurred causing duplicate ballots to be issued to an address entered for a single voter. We are working directly with the system vendor to ensure the issue is addressed and to identify...

Missing ...Forever...



Fight Against Democrats Trying To Steal The Election...

27-Year-Old Former Feminist Urges Young Women to Start Families: ‘I’m Sorry We Lied to You’



She is blowing the whistle against the scam of women’s liberation.

A 27-year-old former feminist is blowing the whistle about women’s liberation and urging young women not to make the same mistake she has made.

The Australian career woman, who goes by the name of Georgia, believes she was sold a lie and deprived of years of happiness because she believed the lies of feminism. As her biological clock has ticked downward, she has realized the failure of the ideology.

“Working women are more often jealous of and less happy than stay-at-home moms, but we told you it was the other way around. I am sorry we lied to you,” the woman said in her video addressed to young women.

Although she is not opposed to women in the workplace, Georgia warns young women that being focused only on their career and not their family can result in great unhappiness.

“We taught you that happiness is in freedom, and that part at least is true, but we told you that freedom was outside of the family home and oppression was inside the family home,” she explained.

“We told you indirectly that you should be ashamed of being a house wife – just a house wife – that it was a dirty word, that it would waste your potential, that it was the easy way out, and those that did do that were a disappointment and were degrading themselves,” she added. “And so when the time crunch came for you to choose your pathway when you were 17, you knew that the only formula for happiness and success was in career.”

She described the endless propaganda blitz to con young women into serving their corporate masters, rather than their families. As a direct consequence, the future of Western Civilization is in jeopardy because women have shirked natural roles as mothers and caregivers.

“We lied to you because we were lied to as well. We thought we were helping you, but now we know better and we are wrong. We need to stop scorning our brightest sisters who choose to spend time with children,” she said.

“We used to do it because we thought they were stupid, but now we do it because we are envious of them. We are jealous and we are bitter, and it is easier to scorn them than face the fact that we made the wrong choice,” she added.

The powerful video can be seen here in its entirety:



“We don’t know how it started but it has to end with you now. True empowerment comes with being properly informed about your choices. I am sorry we didn’t...


Here We Zoom In On Two Hardened Criminals Discussing Their Crimes...



Democrats Are Running Out of Arguments







With a brisk economic revival and continued retrenchment of the virus, it is going to be increasingly difficult for the Democrats to prevail on the merits.

The battle lines on the issue of ending the economic shutdown are drawn more sharply each week. The terror campaign conducted by the media when the coronavirus outbreak began effectively compelled President Trump and most governors to follow the advice of the audible scientists and “flatten the curve” with a comprehensive shutdown requiring huge numbers of people to stay at home.

As the unemployment figures that resulted mounted swiftly toward 40 million, the American Left, now including almost all the official Democrats and almost all the national political media, became instantly addicted to the prospect of holding the president responsible at the election in November for creating an immense economic depression.

When the president recognized the extent of the alarm over the virus in March, he decided he had no alternative politically (and probably none in terms of public health, either) but to shut the country down, acknowledging the authority of the governors to decide exactly how extensively in each state. He took care to announce, as he did this, that the shut-down would be reversed as soon as possible and that his objective was a V-shaped economic recovery: a return almost as vertical as the inevitable decline.

Starting in early April, the president moved more or less subtly to encourage governors to begin reopening their states. Predictably, Republican governors tended to respond positively and promptly to this proposal and their Democratic analogues were more or less sluggish. For a time, both sides moved with relative caution to preserve the fiction that this was a matter of lives, public health, national welfare and, above all things, was beyond politics.

Of course, every observant person knew that in this presidential term nothing has been above politics, (and little has been beneath politics, either). The president cautioned the Republican governor of Georgia Brian Kemp about a general opening of almost all small businesses, but the governor seems to have been justified in taking that step and the president subsequently has applauded it. The apparent Democratic presidential nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden—the personification of the shutdown, now lumbering determinedly through his third subterranean month in Delaware—urged caution.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo was at pains to emphasize that the status of New York as a “hot spot” required him to go slowly, though the debate in New York was overtaken by allegations against the Democrat of responsibility for the deaths of thousands of elderly people by requiring COVID-19 sufferers be returned to nursing homes.

At the outset of the coronavirus crisis there was what proved to be an exaggerated fear that the hospital system would be overwhelmed with coronavirus patients. As a result of that belief, surplus capacity was quickly built in or moved to the larger cities and, instead of the homes for the elderly being protected and insulated from the start, they were in many cases allowed to become infestations of the illness swiftly transmitting the infection among residents. We now know that about one-third of the country’s fatalities from COVID-19 happened in long-term care facilities.

As President Trump has steadily encouraged relaxation of the economic shutdown, public opinion—which once appeared committed to the shutdown and responded so uniformly to the calls for sacrifice—has drifted back to approval for a reopening somewhat timidly. But the tactical trap is closing in slow motion on the Democrats. Since the president’s greatest vulnerability would be if he could not get the shutdown lifted in good time for the country to see the economy reviving before the election, the Democrats have lost the opportunity to flop back to complaints that are now becoming quite audible, that the shutdown should never have been imposed in the first place.

This weekend the president stated that had the experts known more about the virus in March, this comprehensive shutdown would not have been imposed. The Democrats thus are stuck with the shutdown and are stuck with an argument for continuing the shutdown that rests entirely on the continued propagation of exaggerated and unseemly fear.

So far, where the return from the lockdown has proceeded quickly—as in the Republican-governed states of Texas, Florida, and Georgia—the incidence of coronavirus has not risen. (Meanwhile, in Georgia, there has been the leitmotif of Democratic gubernatorial candidate and inveterate seeker of this year’s vice presidential nomination, Stacey Abrams, that she won the election which she lost by 55,000 votes to Kemp).

The rabidly Democratic media who effectively are conducting the campaign for the beleaguered official Democrats, are left clinging to an indefinite shutdown that only panic can justify and that an increasing number of people, now including the president, believe should not even have been...

The President Illustrates Why Corrupt Democrats Want Mail-In Voting...


President Trump On The George Floyd Case: