90 Miles From Tyranny

Monday, July 27, 2020

If you climb on top of and beat an innocent stranger's car, you're a violent criminal who deserves prison

Not even the nicest parts of the American city is safe. The riots have come to Georgetown, the picturesque enclave of some of D.C.'s most decadent denizens, on par with Brentwood or the Upper West Side.

According to the organizing group, Saturday night's Totally Peaceful Protest was predicated on criminal behavior. The rioters planned on obstructing Georgetown traffic, a feat explicitly forbidden by D.C. law, while engaging in a "noise pollution" campaign. Because George Floyd, or something.

That the rioters could have obstructed emergency vehicles was bad enough, but soon the demonstration escalated as rioters climbed on top of and beat the car of a woman who, according to one of the rioters, had simply tried to avoid the riots by driving through a gas station.

Apparently, this needs to be said, but there is no "Karen" in this situation. There is an innocent victim who initially tried to avoid the riots and then tried to escape them as peacefully as possible, and then there are violent criminals who deserve prison time.

It goes without saying, but this is getting out of control. The violence isn't just in CHAZ or on the footsteps of a Portland federal court. It's slowly percolating across entire cityscapes, and unless these criminals are treated as such, there is zero incentive for this to end.

It's time to throw the book at individual offenders instead of waiting until mobs grow to the point the cops resort to using tear gas. Nip these escalations in the bud, lest we become Seattle, where law enforcement is so restrained they're warning property and business owners that they can no longer...

Why Marxist Organizations Like BLM Seek to Dismantle the "Western Nuclear Family"

One of the most oft-cited and criticized goals of the Black Lives Matter organization is its stated desire to abolish the family as we know it. Specifically, BLM’s official website states:

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.

This idea isn’t unique to BLM, of course. “Disrupting” the “nuclear family” is a commonly stated goal among Maxist organizations. Given that BLM’s founders have specifically claimed to be “trained Marxists,” we should not be surprised that the organization's leadership has embraced a Marxian view of the family.

But where does this hostility toward the family originate? Partly, it comes from the theories of Marx and Engels themselves, and their views that an earlier, matriarchal version of the family rejected private property as an organizing principle of society. It was only later that this older tribal model of the family gave way to the modern “patriarchal” family, which promotes and sustains private property.

Clearly, in the Marxian view, this “new” type of family must be opposed, since the destruction of this family model will make it easier to abolish private property as well.

Early Family Units in Tribal Life

Frederick Engels’s 1884 book The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State provides a historical perspective of the Marxian view of the development of the modern Western family unit and its relation to property rights. (Engels, of course, was the longtime benefactor of and collaborator with Marx.)

In reconstructing the origins of the family within a Marxian framework, Engels traces back to the “savage” primeval stage of humanity that, according to his research, revealed a condition in which “unrestricted sexual intercourse existed within a tribe, so that every woman belonged to every man, and vice versa.”

Under such conditions, Engels explained, “it is uncertain who is the father of the child, but certain, who is its mother.” Only female lineage could be acknowledged. “[B]eing the only well known parents of younger generations,” Engels explained, women as mothers “received a high tribute of respect and deference, amounting to a complete women’s rule [gynaicocracy].”

Furthermore, Engels wrote, tribes were subdivided into smaller groups called “gentes,” a primitive form of an extended family of sorts.

These gens were consanguineous (i.e., included people descended from the same ancestor) on the mother’s side, within which intermarrying was strictly forbidden. “The men of certain ‘gens,’ therefore, could choose their wives within the tribe, and did so as a rule, but had to choose them outside of their ‘gens,’” Engels explained. And “marriage” at this stage was a “communal” affair, meaning that multiple partnerships between men and women was closer to...

And Democrats Victims? There Is No Justice...

The Clinton's Haitian Divorce...

Another Suspicious Clinton Related Death: Haiti Official, Who Exposed The Clinton Foundation, Found Dead In Miami

US Surgeon, Who Exposed Clinton Foundation Corruption In Haiti, Found Dead

Actions Speak Louder Than Words...

The Clinton Foundation Swindled Haiti..

Hillary: Haiti Isn't A Shithole, It's A Goldmine!!

Haiti Has A Message For The Clinton Foundation...

When Will Hillary Finally Pay Haiti What She Owes Them?

On Stealing Disaster Funds In Haiti...

POP QUIZ: Guess WHich One The Clinton Foundation Paid For...

Clinton Foundation's chickens coming home to roost in Haiti?

California State University’s Mandate of Ethnic, Social Justice Studies Driven by Hatred of America

Pan-African studies are “the intellectual arm of the revolution,” the unrepentant communist Angela Davis triumphantly told students at California State University, Los Angeles, in a candid moment in 2016. Well, that arm got a lot longer this week.

The entire California State University system just announced Thursday that it was making ethnic and social justice studies mandatory for everyone who wants a degree.

Yes, that means that ethnic and social justice studies will now have pride of place along with English and science as subjects that must be mastered by those brandishing a bachelor’s degree from the vast California system.

Not that ethnic or social justice studies will do one iota to help these young Americans master their fields or become future leaders, which used to be one of the aims of what was formerly called higher education.

No, ethnic and social justice studies are political indoctrination.

Critics would say, hang on, wouldn’t ethnic and social justice studies help Americans get along better in a diverse workforce, body politics, classrooms, etc.? Those critics, of course, would have very little understanding of what actually is taught in ethnic studies or social justice studies.

Ethnic studies teach the members of what in today’s lexicon we call “minorities” (really, any American who belongs to a group that the activists have convinced the bureaucracy to officialize as marginalized) that they have a long list of grievances against the United States, and particularly against whites.

To Americans who have been cordoned off into the groups thought of as belonging to the “oppressor” classes, ethnic and social justice studies classes instruct them to forthwith act submissively, assume the burden of collective guilt for...

Burn That Motha Down.

Democrats, Media Push Dangerous Conspiracy Theory, Trump Prepping Military for ‘Stealing’ Election

In a sure sign that regardless of their bluster Democrats and their media allies believe Donald Trump will win re-election in November they are now pushing a dangerous new conspiracy theory claiming the President is prepping the military to steal the November election.

Here’s a “supercut” video that blows the whole sordid thing wide open:

So now all of the polls showing Biden ahead by big numbers, both nationally and in battleground states, make sense.

Their purpose is to hopefully propel Biden to an actual lead in the polls and help push the narrative that the only way Trump can win in November is by stealing the election.

What’s crystal clear is that Democrats are willing to literally burn down America, and destroy our country, if it could help them defeat Donald Trump.

They are vile despicable people, and...

Purple Haze all in my brain,

lately things don't seem the same,

actin' funny but I don't know why

'scuse me while I kiss this guy.

CNN Forces Sinclair Broadcast Group To Axe Interview With ‘Plandemic’ Author Dr Judy Mikovits

Cable network created an outrage campaign that convinced broadcaster to pull scheduled interview.

CNN created an online campaign to bombard conservative broadcast company Sinclair over an interview it was scheduled to broadcast with Dr Judy Mikovits, the author and creator of the ‘Plandemic’ film and book, and it worked as Sinclair eventually agreed to pull the interview.

Mikovits, who contends that the Coronavirus outbreak is being inflated and used to push vaccines on people, had already filmed the interview with ‘America This Week’ host Eric Bolling, but the interview did not air this weekend as planned.

Despite the interview also featuring a doctor who refutes Mikovits’ claims, CNN complained that it didn’t push back hard enough.

Leftists on Twitter then made it their mission to get Sinclair to drop the broadcast.

Initially, Sinclair refused to do so declaring that “at no juncture are we aligning with or endorsing the viewpoints of Dr Mikovits.”

But just hours later the broadcaster had completely capitulated to the censorship mob:

Sinclair also noted that “we valiantly support Dr Fauci and the work he and his team are doing to further prevent the spread of Covid-19,” referencing the criticism Dr Mikovits has levelled at Fauci.

related: Dr. Anthony Fauci's ex-employee, was jailed, finally tells all.

The decision means that the interview will not have the opportunity to reach Sinclair’s audience, which equates to around 40 percent of...

The rioters have been given a free pass.

The Seattle Police Department began informing small business owners in the city on Friday that the force will have little to no means to prevent crimes from vandals and rioters targeting their businesses, after the Seattle City Council passed an ordinance preventing the city police from using even less-lethal crowd control measures such as pepper spray to deter violent crowds.

Ordinance 119805 prevents the Seattle police from using common law enforcement tools such as pepper spray and tear gas.

The stark admission was made in a letter addressed to Seattle small businesses.

“Simply put, the legislation gives officers NO ability to safely intercede to preserve property in the midst of a large, violent crowd.

For these reasons, Seattle Police will have an adjusted deployment in response to any demonstrations this weekend- as I will never ask our officers to risk their personal safety to protect property without the tools to do so in a safe way.”

Downtown Seattle has suffered from a whopping 525% increase in crime since the start of the now-dismantled Capital Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) project, an anarchist commune in which several people were murdered by...

90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling