90 Miles From Tyranny

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #1139

You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?

It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,

from the beautiful to the repugnant,

from the mysterious to the familiar.

If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,

you could be inspired, you could be appalled.

This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.

You have been warned.

Girls With Guns

The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Phoebe Kline

Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around

The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style

EBL has: Rule 5 And FMJRA

The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama

The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

The Death Of All That Is Good In America...

Can I Have Some Remedy?

[Verse 1]

Baby, baby why can't you sit still?

Who killed that bird out on you window sill?

Are you the reason that he broke his back?

Tell me, did I see, you think I'd laugh about that? Alright!

[Interlude]

If I come on like a dream

Will you let me show you what I mean?

Will you let me come on inside?

Ohh, will you let it glide?

[Chorus]

Can I have some remedy?

(All I want is a remedy)

Remedy for me, please

(For all of the things I really do need)

If had some remedy

(oh, I'd take another one)

I'd take enough to please me (please me), yeah!

[Verse Two]

Say, baby, baby why you dye your hair?

Why you always keeping with your mother's dare?

So baby, why's who's who?, I said who knows you too?

Tell me, did the other children scold on you?

Man Is Not Free Unless Government Is Limited...

More Ronald Reagan:

Democrats: If It Moves, Tax It, If It Keeps Moving Regulate It, If It Stops Moving, Subsidize It..

Ronald Reagan On The Moral Courage Of Free Men And Women..

Jan 20, 1981: Iran Hostage Crisis ends - Thank you Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan Quotes

The Gipper vs The Dipper...

Then And Now..

Happy Birthday Ronald Reagan

Individual Responsibility

Real Leadership Looks Like This

A Shining City on a Hill

Ronald Reagan has a Message for us for 2013

The Difference Between A Socialist And An Anti-Socialist...

There Is No Security, No Safety, In The Appeasement Of Evil...

WHO Flip-Flops Again, Now Says COVID-19 Lockdowns Are Bad

After instigating a global panic about the corona-virus pandemic, the World Health Organization now insists that governments should not use lock-downs in combating the virus

In a flip-flop of monumental proportions, the World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19 is urging world leaders not to use lockdowns as the chief weapon against the virus.

David Nabarro, the special envoy named by the embattled organization, told reporters that lockdowns should be used sparingly and for only specific situations, temporary in nature.

“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Nabarro said in an interview October 8, 2020. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”

Nabarro specifically pointed to the devastation lockdowns have caused the economies of the world, and to the severe societal damage they cause to communities and the those below the poverty line.

“This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe, actually,” he said. “And so we really do appeal to all world leaders: Stop using lockdown as your primary control method, develop better systems for doing it, work together and learn from each other, but remember – lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.”

Nabarro joins a growing community of medical and public health scientists and medical practitioners who are advocating for the abandonment of generalized lockdowns and mass quarantines.

A significant group of dignitaries from the scientific and medical fields have signed a document titled...

Associated Press Redefines Packing the Supreme Court as ‘Depoliticizing’ It

The Associated Press described Democrats’ proposal to “pack” the Supreme Court with liberal justices in new seats as merely an effort to “depoliticize” it in a report on Saturday.

For more than a year, Democrats have proposed “packing” the Supreme Court by adding more justices, increasing the total from the current nine to at least eleven, and then filling the seats with liberals.

Those calls have become louder and more intense in the days since the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Former Vice President Joe Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), have refused to say whether they would pack the courts. On Friday, Biden went further, telling an interviewer that voters do not deserve to know his view before the election.

Court-packing is traditionally unpopular — so much so that Democrats opposed the idea when their own president, Franklin D. Roosevelt, proposed it in the 1930s.

Left-wing pundits have attempted to reframe the issue as merely “depoliticizing” the existing court.

The AP article in question was about the Senate race between Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D) and incumbent Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT). The issue of court-packing came up during...