Or: How To Kill Off All The Old White Men....
Wednesday, November 11, 2020
The Problem of False Chinese Economic Data
China has a long history of opaqueness when it comes to reporting economic statistics.
Although the communist regime claims the economic numbers it reports are factual, a new report by the New York Federal Reserve shows China’s gross domestic product growth volatility is incredibly—and unbelievably—low compared to other countries.
The report details how China’s reported data is too smooth over time compared to authentic statistics, and debunks it further by comparing it with other sources of information, such as satellite images of nighttime lights, which reveal wider fluctuations in economic activity than the official Chinese statistics.
Unfortunately, opaqueness in Chinese GDP growth rates is just the tip of an iceberg of secrecy. As a recent report by The Heritage Foundation notes:
The statistics China provides cannot be trusted, however; and their inaccuracies have wide implications for global markets in commodities, international investments, and for companies doing business with China.
How China sets its overall budget, the actual size of its military budget, the relationship among various political factions, and even how specific decisions may be staffed are all elements that the [People’s Republic of China] deliberately strives to conceal.
Nonetheless, as the world’s second-largest economy, as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, and as a major power, the PRC has to provide some information about its economy, its political positions, and its various national and international endeavors, if only to interact with other states and economies.
As China becomes more integrated with global markets, the risk of surprise shocks or unforeseen...
Anti-racism professor Ibram Kendi: Term ‘legal vote’ is racist
The phrase “When everything is racist, then nothing is” these days probably applies best to Boston University’s Ibram Kendi, author of the book (appropriately titled) “How To Be An Antiracist.”
It was bad enough when Kendi, the founder of BU’s Center for Antiracist Research, posited during the Amy Coney Barrett SCOTUS hearings that white people who adopt black children are “colonizers”; now, in the midst of the hotly contested 2020 presidential election, the professor says the term “legal vote” is “racist.”
In a series of tweets this past Saturday, Kendi compared the (alleged) racism of “legal vote” to that of “illegal alien,” “personal responsibility” and “race neutral.”
It’s “rarely the […] literal meaning” which makes a term racist, Kendi said, but the “historical and political context in which the term is being used.”
Kendi noted it’s no surprise areas targeted with “misinformation” about voting irregularities, such as Philadelphia and Detroit, are “where Black and Brown voters predominate.”
“No matter what GOP propaganda says, there’s nothing wrong with...
VOTE FRAUD Proven: time series analysis proves synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.
This is based on their proprietary "Edison" data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press.
The CSV is available here:
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id145669…
And the script to generate it is here:
What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.
One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots.
As we can see on this log-log plot, for many of the counting progress updates, we see an almost constant ratio of #Biden to #Trump. It's such a regular pattern that we can actually fit a linear regression model to it with near-perfect accuracy, barring some outliers.
How could this be possible? Is this a telltale sign of fraud?
Surprisingly, as it will be shown, the answer is no! This is actually expected behavior. Also, we can use this weird pattern in the ballot counting to spot fraud!
Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again.
and again
and again
Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again.
and again
and again
Free Speech Platform Parler Adds 4.5 MILLION New Users as Conservatives Flee Big Tech Authoritarianism and Censorship
Follow me at @MikeMiles I will follow back!
https://parler.com/profile/MikeMiles/posts
Parler is exploding
The CEO of free speech social media platform Parler announced that almost five million people have signed up for his service in the aftermath of the disputed US presidential election, representing a tidal wave of conservatives, right-wingers, and nationalists sick and tired of Twitter’s overbearing and constant left-wing censorship tactics.
“People from all walks of life, fed up with opaque, biased content curation, inconsistent agenda-driven fact checking, and manipulative algorithms built on data mining, are joining Parler to speak free. Since Friday, over 4.5 million new people have created accounts, and engagement has surged. Over 5 million individuals were active on Parler yesterday, an 8-fold increase from daily activity just a week ago. Our session activity has increased by well over 20 times during the same period,” Parler CEO John Matze said in a statement.
Parler took the #1 spot on Apple’s app store, an encouraging development for First Amendment principles. However, the platform’s rising popularity may be met with the usual tactics of cowardly censorship from Apple, a company that has shown itself to be more than willing to block software that allows for free expression on the internet.
Matze cited Twitter’s and Facebook dishonest and deceptive marketing tactics and censorship as the driving factor in growing the popularity of Parler.
“Facebook and Twitter’s suppression of election information was a catalyst, causing many people to lose their trust. But the movement away from these platforms was already well underway. Many of you have been activists alongside us, calling out the lack of transparency and unjust...
Parler is exploding
The CEO of free speech social media platform Parler announced that almost five million people have signed up for his service in the aftermath of the disputed US presidential election, representing a tidal wave of conservatives, right-wingers, and nationalists sick and tired of Twitter’s overbearing and constant left-wing censorship tactics.
“People from all walks of life, fed up with opaque, biased content curation, inconsistent agenda-driven fact checking, and manipulative algorithms built on data mining, are joining Parler to speak free. Since Friday, over 4.5 million new people have created accounts, and engagement has surged. Over 5 million individuals were active on Parler yesterday, an 8-fold increase from daily activity just a week ago. Our session activity has increased by well over 20 times during the same period,” Parler CEO John Matze said in a statement.
Parler took the #1 spot on Apple’s app store, an encouraging development for First Amendment principles. However, the platform’s rising popularity may be met with the usual tactics of cowardly censorship from Apple, a company that has shown itself to be more than willing to block software that allows for free expression on the internet.
Matze cited Twitter’s and Facebook dishonest and deceptive marketing tactics and censorship as the driving factor in growing the popularity of Parler.
“Facebook and Twitter’s suppression of election information was a catalyst, causing many people to lose their trust. But the movement away from these platforms was already well underway. Many of you have been activists alongside us, calling out the lack of transparency and unjust...
Why Scott Adams of Dilbert Fame And I Say Trump Wins This Thing - Bigly
Ok, sit back from your sleepless nights and fury every time you turn on Fox News and put down the Chardonnay and take a long, deep breath. Please!
On Monday, Scott Adams of Dilbert fame, who is one of the finest critical minds in the podcast world quoted AmericanThinker.com’s article that said Trump was probably going to win this thing. Scott Adams agreed!
Biden is at 290 Electoral votes; awarded by the mainstream media. Nothing is truly awarded until the state legislatures do so in mid-December, so chill. However, the mainstream media is screwing with your heads by calling this election because they hate the guy who called them FAKE NEWS.
And you are letting them do it. Stop!
Let’s do some arithmetic.
Biden needs 270 Electoral votes or more to come out of the basement and become the first chief executive of the most powerful force on the planet with early stage dementia. It is a civil rights thing so deal with it. If you think that is wrong, you are a racist.
The 290 Electoral vote total includes 20 from Pennsylvania. There is a ton of fraud in that state and you are seeing all kinds of reports of ballots coming in at 4:00 AM and all that. Skip it. That does not matter.
Focus people on the Justice Alito Supreme Court Order. Justice Alito, not a man with whom to trifle, is in charge of day-to-day activities for a group of states and Pennsylvania is one of them. The Justice told Pennsylvania to “segregate” any vote that came in after 8:00 PM on election night. You will recall, DJ was winning bigly (a Scott Adams word) at that point.
Around midnight, Texas time, the Pennsylvania vote counters stopped counting. Then the truckloads of new ballots came in, reportedly voting for Biden and no other candidate for any lower office.
The Supreme Court ruled, sort of, in this case already. They said, with 4 Justices led by Justice Alito that ONLY the Pennsylvania legislature can make or modify voting rules. Read the opinions – this thing is NOT going to go to Biden.
It is black and white, in the United States Constitution, a dusty document tourists see in the National Archives in DC.
The Pennsylvania legislature did not allow such voting changes, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, a quite partisan body, did. And the grown-ups at the U.S. Supreme Court said that was judicial overreach. That is not a good thing for Biden.
This week, Justice Alito again said all votes coming in after 8:00 PM on election night need to be segregated. That is what is called a Federal Court Order. That’s no parking ticket.
The leftists will say this is a racist thing because of the word “segregated.” Maybe separated would be more politically correct.
Anyway, it is pretty clear with Justice Amy Barrett on the Supreme Court, those votes in Pennsylvania are getting backed out right after Rudy Giuliani makes his case. The mainstream media know that; thus, they are screwing with your heads and you are up all night eating popcorn looking for any shred of...
Veterans Day: Once A Soldier, Always A Soldier.
11 Quotes On Courage.. For Veterans Day...
Remember: Memorial Day is the day to remember those men and women who died while serving in our nation’s armed forces, whereas Veterans Day is a day to celebrate the service of all U.S. military veterans.
Today we celebrate the service of all U.S. military veterans.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)