Before You Click On The "Read More" Link,
Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.
If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.
Please Leave Silently Into The Night......
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #1280
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Monday, March 1, 2021
Blogs With Rule 5 Links
Extremely Late!
The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Cathryn Li
Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around
The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style
EBL has: Rule 5 And FMJRA
The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama
The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup
The 'Drug Trafficker, Pimp, and Rapist Relief Act'
Hidden within President Biden's amnesty bill is a "sleeper" provision that grants amnesty to criminal aliens — or at least makes them eligible to seek it. The fact is, the difference is not that great, as I will explain. You could call it the "Drug Trafficker, Pimp, and Rapist Relief Act" (and include murderers, child sex offenders, and those who convicted of slavery, too).
You have to get down to section 1204, at p. 73, to find the provision, euphemistically named "Restoring Fairness to Adjudications". Sounds reasonable. Until you read it.
That section would add new waivers to sections 212(c) and 237(a)(8) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Let me give you some history to better explain how breathtakingly lenient those provisions are.
History of Section 212(c) of the INA
There had been a waiver in section 212(c) of the INA since 1952, but that was removed in 1996 by Congress in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). Why was section 212(c) removed by IIRIRA?
Because it provided relief to some pretty unsavory criminal aliens. Here's how that provision read, from 1952 to 1990:
Aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence who temporarily proceeded abroad voluntarily and not under an order of deportation, and who are returning to a lawful unrelinquished domicile of seven consecutive years, may be admitted in the discretion of the Attorney General without regard to [their excludability under section 212(a) of the INA].I will stop right there to explain what that means. The old 212(c) waiver was originally only available to aliens with green cards, and only then if they had been living in the United States for seven years. And it was originally meant to grant them a waiver if they were returning from abroad.
In 1976, however, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that it also applied to green card holders who had not left the United States, finding on due process and equal protection grounds that it was not fair to treat returning immigrants differently. That made section 212(c) waivers a form of relief from deportation.
In 2001, the Supreme Court held that: "The extension of § 212(c) relief to the deportation context has had great practical importance, because deportable offenses have historically been defined broadly." In other words, if you were a lawful permanent resident criminal who had not left the United States, until 1976, you were likely to be deported (because that is what Congress wanted).
And it was granted pretty liberally: Between 1989 and 1995, more than 10,000 aliens were granted 212(c) relief, many if not most because those green-card holders were deportable on criminal grounds. One immigration judge (IJ) before whom I appeared told me that she would usually grant it to an alien at least...
China Announces Its February Employee Of The Month...
What A Shining Star China Has As An Employee!
Honey you are my shining star
Don't you go away, oh baby
Wanna be right here where you are
Till my dying day, yeah baby
"Al Qaeda Is On Our Side In Syria" – Joe Biden’s National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan
Jacob Sullivan serves as the National Security Advisor to U.S. President Joe Biden. He was previously senior policy advisor to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential election campaign and Deputy Chief of Staff at the Department of State. He was exposed in a leaked email claiming – Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria.
American President Joe Biden’s National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan emailed then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that Al-Qaeda was “on our side” during the Obama administration.
The email was released by WikiLeaks during the escalation of the Syrian Civil War when Jake Sullivan was Director of Policy Planning in the Obama White House.
Now the National Security Adviser to President Biden, Sullivan revealed that Al-Qaeda was “on our side” in Syria.
In full, the email to Clinton entitled SPOT REPORT 02/12/II reads:
See last item – AQ is on our side in Syria.
Otherwise, things have basically turned out as expected...
Burn The Witches Of The Wicked Talking Box!!!
Or Drown Them....
I'm the man in the box, buried in my shit
Won't you come and save me, save me?
Feed my eyes, can you sew them shut?
Jesus Christ, deny your maker
He who tries, will be wasted
Feed my eyes, now you've sewn them shut
I'm the dog who gets beat, shove my nose in shit
Won't you come and save me, save me?
Trump talks about Jan 6th riot: Pelosi’s people rejected 10K Natl Guard troops I recommended
Former President Trump had a busy day Sunday, first closing out the annual CPAC gathering in Orlando, Fla., where he offered a very forward looking message on the future of the Republican Party, and then doing a phone-in interview later in the evening on Fox News.
It was toward the end of that interview on “The Next Revolution With Steve Hilton,” that Trump spoke about the storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. for the first time, putting to rest some rumors — see fake news — about his actions.
Host Steve Hilton said the media reported that Trump was watching events unfold and liked what he was seeing “because you felt that it was your people fighting for you.”
“Do you get how bad it was? And is there anything, looking back on it now, that you would have done differently that day?” the Fox News host asked.
“Well, that’s incorrect reporting,” the former president replied. “First of all, I wasn’t watching TV. I turned it on later on when I heard about it and did a lot of moves.”
Trump said “we” talked to the “top person” at the Department of Defense about the expected crowd size “days before we had the rally.”
“I requested, I said, ‘Look, this rally is going to be bigger than anyone thinks’ … and it was, I think, the largest crowd that I’ve ever spoken before … and I said that I think you should have 10,000 — I think I gave the number, I definitely gave the number of 10,000 National Guardsmen — I think you should have 10,000 of the National Guard ready,” he said.
“They took that number, from what I understand, they gave it to the people at the Capitol, which is controlled by Pelosi,” Trump continued. “And I heard they rejected it because they didn’t think it would look good. So, you know, that was a big mistake.”
Not exactly the actions you would expect from someone who was allegedly trying to incite an insurrection.
Perhaps, this explains why Democratic impeachment managers suddenly backed off on calling witnesses during Trump’s Senate impeachment trial — it was reported at the time that his defense team planned to call Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Pressed on how he felt about what was taking place that day, Trump was very clear in saying he...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)