90 Miles From Tyranny

infinite scrolling

Friday, July 30, 2021

Like A Hollywood Movie, The January 6th Commission Is Scripted And The Conclusion Is Already Known....

 


There's A Bunch Of Thespians In That There Room....

Acting! Acting!

No All Capital Police Are Lying Shit Bags, But This One Is...

 


ACTING! ACTING!

The 2021 Downgrade....


 

Among All Of These, We Went From A Model That Speaks 7 Languages To A Self Important Narcissistic Dementia Caretaker....

Republican Lawmakers Barred From Entering D.C. Jail to Visit Jan. 6 Political Prisoners


A group of Republican lawmakers on Thursday were locked out of the Washington DC prison where the January 6 political prisoners are being held, and accused of trespassing.

“My colleagues and I were locked out of the Deplorable Jail!” tweeted Marjorie Taylor-Greene (R-Ga.).

After they were initially allowed in the entrance way, and given masks, an officer told the House republicans that they were trespassing, and locked them out.

“My gosh, the government is upside down,” Gohmert, a former judge, exclaimed.

“Every day in America people are locked in prison, it’s not every day people are locked out of a prison, but that is what happened to multiple members of Congress today, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) said during a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol afterward.

Reps Gaetz, MTG, Bob Good (R-Va.), Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) and Louis Gohmert (R-Tex.) attempted to tour the facility to see how the detainees are being treated.

Gaetz said in his remarks that they were just denied the ability to carry out their two “principle responsibilities” as congressmen—to appropriate funds, and to conduct oversight.

“How does the Biden administration expect us to participate in the representative Republic when they deprive us of access to information that would inform our oversight work and our appropriations decisions?” Gaetz complained.

The same group of conservative lawmakers Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) were barred from entering the Department of Justice on Tuesday, while leftists attempted to disrupt their press conference. The lawmakers held the presser outside the DOJ to condemn the harsh treatment of the January 6th political prisoners and demand answers from Attorney General Merrick Garland on a number of issues regarding...

Pop Goes The Wheelie!


More great GIFS:

THANKS GLOBAL WARMING!

Don't You Know That You Are A Shooting Star?

Wood You Please Find The Driver?

The North Korean Tiger Inspects His Assault Weapons...

And....Ouch!

The Tragedy Of Alcohol Abuse...

New FBI Initiative Will Put "Hate Crime" Quotas On Local Law Enforcement - Guess Who They Are After?


The Department of Justice and the FBI have a message for local police departments: start charging more white people with hate crimes or invite an investigation.

Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta told an assembly of FBI agents yesterday that they are now tasked with hounding police departments in their district if they do not register any "hate crimes."

Gupta and FBI Deputy Assistant Director of the Criminal Investigative Division Jay Greenberg have declared "hate crimes" by "racially motivated violent extremists" (a euphemism generally reserved for right-wing white men) to be a national threat priority -- a rare designation.

According to Greenberg, the FBI will be increasingly specialized in pursuing "hate crimes" through increased training in the matter, an aggressive media campaign designed to recruit victims in "underrepresented and targeted populations," and putting federal pressure on local law enforcement to charge and report hate crimes when they otherwise wouldn't.

Hate crimes laws are political and racially motivated. Blacks and Jews are heavily overrepresented as supposed victims in the FBI's "hate crime" database, while whites are charged at higher rates than general crime rates. Blacks are rarely charged with hate crimes when they commit bias crimes against whites. For example, last month a black man who shot five white men in a multi-state shooting spree told police his sole motive was that he hated white people, yet neither local prosecutors or the FBI have charged him with a hate crime.

According to the FBI's 2019 hate crime report, blacks are 49% of victims of racial bias while Jews are 60% of crimes motivated by religious animosity. Most of the blacks in the data were victims of "intimidation," an often Constitutionally dubious charge. A large number of reported hate crimes targeting both blacks and Jews are hoaxes, as seen in famous cases like the Jussie Smollett incident and the thousands of bomb threats targeting Jewish community centers that were the work of a Jew in Israel.

Just yesterday, a white man was charged with "ethnic intimidation" for putting up stickers that say "I Love Being White." The FBI wants more police departments to exploit the legal gray area and lack of First Amendment advocacy groups for white dissidents to juke crime statistics and distort the reality of crime. Blacks commit roughly 90% of violent interracial felonies, a statistic the Critical Race Theorists at the FBI find inconvenient.

The mad rush for white racists at the FBI is bound to cause more embarrassments for the increasingly discredited agency. Last year, the theater put on by the FBI over NASCAR driver Bubba Wallace's "noose," which turned out to be a hoax, served to reveal the...

We Are So F*cked


 

Lloyd J. Austin III


No Salute???

RON PAUL WARNS THAT THE JAN. 6 ‘SHOW TRIALS’ STAGED BY PELOSI, DEMOCRATS ‘THREATEN ALL’ AMERICANS


The recent felony conviction and eight month prison sentence of Jan. 6 protester Paul Hodgkins is an affront to any notion of justice. It is a political charge and a political verdict by a political court. Every American regardless of political persuasion should be terrified of a court system so beholden to politics instead of justice.

We've seen this movie before and it does not end well.

Worse than this miscarriage of justice is the despicable attempt by the prosecutor in the case to label Hodgkins – who has no criminal record and was accused of no violent crime – a terrorist.

As journalist Michael Tracey recently wrote, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Mona Sedky suggested Hodgkins was a 'terrorist' in the court proceedings not for committing any terrorist act, not for any act of violence, not even for imagining a terrorist act.

Sedky wrote in her sentencing memo, 'the Government…recognizes that Hodgkins did not personally engage in or espouse violence or property destruction.' She added, 'we concede that Mr. Hodgkins himself is not under the legal definition a domestic terrorist.'

Yet Hodgkins should be considered a terrorist because the actions he took – entering the Senate to take a photo of himself – occurred during an event that the court is 'framing…in the context of terrorism.'

That goes beyond a slippery slope. He is not a terrorist because he committed a terrorist act, but because somehow the 'context' of his actions was, in her words, 'imperiling democracy.'

In other words, Hodgkins deserved enhanced punishment because he committed a thought crime. The judge on the case, Randolph D. Moss, admitted as much. In carrying a Trump flag into the Senate, he said, Hodgkins was, 'declaring his loyalty to a single individual over the nation.'

As Tracey pointed out, while eight months in prison is a ridiculously long sentence for standing on the floor of the 'People's House' and taking a photograph, it is also a ridiculously short sentence for a terrorist. If Hodgkins is really a terrorist, shouldn't he be sent away for longer than eight months?

The purpose of the Soviet show trials was to create an enemy that the public could collectively join in hating and blaming for all the failures of the system. The purpose was to turn one part of the population against the other part of the population and demand they be 'cancelled.' And it worked very well…for awhile.

In a recent article, libertarian author Jim Bovard quoted from Solzhenitsyn's “Gulag Archipelago” about how average people turned out to demand “justice” for the state’s designated 'political' enemies: 'There were universal meetings and demonstrations (including even school-children). It was the newspaper march of millions, and the roar rose outside the windows of the courtroom: 'Death! Death! Death!''

While we are not quite there yet, we are moving in that direction. Americans being sent to prison not for what they did, but for what they believe? Does that sound like the kind of America we...

The Kangaroo Kourt Is In Da House!!!


 

Pelosi Uses Capitol Police as Her Own Personal Stasi, Demands Arrest of All Non-Mask Wearers in the Capitol


U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is having her Capitol Police goon squad arrest everyone at the U.S. Capitol – whether they are a staffer or a visitor – if they do not submit to force masking.

With the COVID-19 experimental vaccines failing to live up to expectations, the country is turning back to mask submission, and this time, it will be enforced through incarceration if Pelosi has her way.

“On July 27, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued new mask guidance that all individuals, vaccinated and unvaccinated alike, should wear a mask in indoor spaces to reduce the spread of the Delta variant of COVID-19,” a bulletin to the Capitol police reads.

The bulletin continues: “According the CDC, the Delta variant has become “the dominant coronavirus in the United States and continues to challenge aspects of disease control, public health, and the urgency to complete vaccination for unvaccinated individuals.”’

“Based on this information, the Office of Attending Physician (OAP) advised that Congress follow the CDC’s guidance to require mask wearing in interior spaces to help reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection,” the bulletin adds.

Later in the memo, the call for visitors or staffers to be arrested if they refuse to comply with the regime of forced masking is made.

“If a visitor or a staff member fails to wear a mask after a request is made to do so, the visitor or staff shall be denied entry to the House Office Buildings or House-side of the U.S. Capitol. Any person who fails to comply or leave the premises after being asked to do so would be subject to an arrest for Unlawful Entry,” the bulletin reads.

Pelosi’s Orwellian memo to the U.S. Capitol police can be seen here:
Big League Politics has reported on how Capitol Police officers are becoming Pelosi’s personal Stasi, reciting scripts of fiction in order to justify a domestic police state crackdown against...

The Answer To This Question Is: NO


 

My Love Is Vengeance...

Which Biden Official Asked The NSA To Unmask Tucker Carlson?



Immediate steps must be taken to stop this abuse of U.S. intelligence agencies to weaponize intelligence against American journalists.

Last week, a National Security Agency (NSA) investigation quietly confirmed Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s allegation that it had collected his electronic communications. The NSA also admitted the content of Carlson’s communications was leaked to the press after they “unmasked” Carlson’s name to a Biden administration official.

The NSA cannot legally target the communications of Americans without an order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) court. However, such communications are often “incidentally” collected when an innocent American communicates with a legitimate NSA target, such as someone believed to be under the control of or collaborating with a hostile foreign power.

When this happens, the name of the innocent American is supposed to be “masked,” or redacted. Senior U.S. officials are permitted to request the name of a masked American cited in an NSA report if the name is necessary to understanding the report. If the NSA approves an unmasking request, the name of the masked American is only briefed to the requesting official, who is advised that this information is extremely sensitive and cannot be revealed to others without the NSA’s permission.

After the Obama administration abused this process to obtain information from NSA reports about Trump campaign officials in 2016, the Trump administration adopted strict rules for unmasking requests.

The leaks to the press of NSA collection of Tucker Carlson’s electronic communications suggest the Biden administration either did away with the Trump administration’s rules on unmasking requests, or is ignoring them. In light of this obvious partisan abuse of a U.S. intelligence agency, Congress must press the Biden administration to answer several questions about the Carlson matter:

First, who made the unmasking request for Carlson’s name from NSA reporting? And will this person be held accountable for leaking classified information?

Second, does the Biden administration have a policy on requests by senior officials to unmask the names of Americans from intelligence reports? If so, how is this policy being enforced?

The leaking of Carlson’s identity by Biden officials is a serious matter because it appears to confirm the Biden administration’s use of U.S. intelligence agencies to target its political enemies. But there’s an even more serious concern here: spying on journalists and leaking...