Wednesday, November 3, 2021
CDC Recommends Prophylactic Ivermectin for Migrants and Immigrants
Anyone remember this “folksy” tweet trying to get people to not take Ivermectin because it was for farm animals? Horse dewormer and all, and definitely not-not-not for use in human beings, evah?
So now is the time where we JUXTAPOSE.
Look here, Immigrant, Refugee, and Migrant Health, (and CDC, I’ve screenshotted this, PDFed it, and got it so emailed out and distributed you’ll never disappear it). Here’s the intro (note the website URL at the top which I’ve circled):
And the key section, Intestinal Parasite Guidance (no circling, it’s obvious):
According to a search – screenshot below – Ivermectin is mentioned 47 times (funny how they mention something that many times for PEOPLE coming to the US if it’s not meant for PEOPLE, no?):
Never-Before-Seen Rittenhouse Video Shows the Moment the Mob Almost Got Him, Could Be Key to His Defense
Never-before-seen footage of the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting appears to clear the teenager of wrongdoing.
Human Events Daily obtained the footage which the outlet’s senior editor — Jack Posobiec — alleges is “never-before-seen FBI footage of the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting.”
Rittenhouse, who is 18 years old, currently faces homicide charges for fatally shooting Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26. He is also facing attempted homicide charges for shooting Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, among various other lesser charges.
In a subsequent tweet published hours later, Posobiec alleged that the FBI “refused to allow this video to be broadcast publicly, and covered up the testimony of the pilot who flew the plane.”
Toward the end of the video in question, near the 1 minute and 40-second mark, aerial footage appears to show Rittenhouse fleeing a group of men.
Three men — presumably Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz — can then be seen chasing after him.
After doing his best to create distance, it appears that Rittenhouse only fires as the first pursuer, who CNN identifies as Rosenbaum, came within mere feet of him.
The website of Rittenhouse’s legal defense fund alleges the shooting event unfolded as follows:
After a man — Joshua Ziminski — brandished a handgun and confronted Rittenhouse, bystanders began yelling threats at him. It was then that Rittenhouse looked over his shoulder and saw Rosenbaum running at him, according to the legal fund.
Kyle then fled from Rosenbaum, heard Ziminki fire his weapon and turned to see Rosenbaum “inches from him” and “grabbing for his weapon.”
The new footage appears to back up this story.
It’s difficult to watch these events unfold and not come to the conclusion that Rittenhouse’s life was in danger, therefore justifying...
Toward the end of the video in question, near the 1 minute and 40-second mark, aerial footage appears to show Rittenhouse fleeing a group of men.
Three men — presumably Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz — can then be seen chasing after him.
After doing his best to create distance, it appears that Rittenhouse only fires as the first pursuer, who CNN identifies as Rosenbaum, came within mere feet of him.
The website of Rittenhouse’s legal defense fund alleges the shooting event unfolded as follows:
After a man — Joshua Ziminski — brandished a handgun and confronted Rittenhouse, bystanders began yelling threats at him. It was then that Rittenhouse looked over his shoulder and saw Rosenbaum running at him, according to the legal fund.
Kyle then fled from Rosenbaum, heard Ziminki fire his weapon and turned to see Rosenbaum “inches from him” and “grabbing for his weapon.”
The new footage appears to back up this story.
It’s difficult to watch these events unfold and not come to the conclusion that Rittenhouse’s life was in danger, therefore justifying...
How Much of Your Money Will Democrats Spend To Buy Elections???
An Infinite Amount, Infinite.
The more Democrats recklessly print and spend money, the more likely it is that The USA will lose its Reserve Currency status, which would be an absolute disaster for Americans.
Blogs With Rule 5 Links
A Little Late!
The Other McCain has: Rule 5 Sunday: Danielle Rose Russell
Proof Positive has: Best Of Web Link Around
The Woodsterman has: Rule 5 Woodsterman Style
EBL has: Rule 5 And FMJRA
The Right Way has: Rule 5 Saturday LinkORama
The Pirate's Cove has: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup
The Supreme Showdown: Bruen Has The Makings of a Major Second Amendment Victory
The case concerns concealed-carry restrictions under N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f) that require a showing of “proper cause.” Lower courts have upheld the New York law, but there are ample constitutional concerns over its vague standard, such as showing that you are “of good moral character.” New York wants to exercise discretion in deciding who needs to carry guns in public while gun owners believe that the law flips the constitutional presumption in favor of such a right.
There are few constitutional rights that have been debated so long in this country as gun rights. Indeed, before other Englishmen were given a written guarantee of the right to bear arms, colonists in Virginia in 1607 were given such a written guarantee by the Crown. Since that time, the right to bear arms has been an engrained part of our culture and ultimately our Constitution.
Despite that history, the meaning of the right has remained the subject of heated debate. That is evident from the fact that it was not until 2008 that the Supreme Court finally recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v. Heller. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court ruled that this right applied against the states.
This is actually the second time in two years that the New York State Rifle Association has come knocking on the door of the Supreme Court. The Association previously challenged a New York law that imposed stringent conditions on the ability of gun owners to even transport their guns outside of their homes. The law was viewed by some of us as unconstitutional under existing case law, but New York politicians insisted that it would be defended all the way up to the Supreme Court. However, when the Court called their bluff and accepted the case, those politicians quickly changed the law and pulled the case before the Court could rule.
The bait-and-switch incensed members of the Court who delayed in the dismissal of the case. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas specifically called out New York for “manipulating” the docket by withdrawing an unconstitutional law just before a final opinion. Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined in the condemnation and added menacingly that “some federal and state courts may not be properly applying Heller and McDonald. The Court should address that issue soon, perhaps in one of the several Second Amendment cases with petitions for certiorari now pending before the Court.”
They ultimately did precisely that and took another case by the very same plaintiffs: the New York State Rifle Association.
The current court membership is arguably the strongest Second Amendment bench in decades. That includes Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote a strong defense of...
Virginia's New Lieutenant Governor Is A Screaming Night Terror Nightmare For Leftists...
#winsomesears
Winsome Sears, a conservative Republican, will be Virginia's next lieutenant governor, breaking barriers as the first female and the first woman of color in the office in the commonwealth's 400-year legislative history.
It’s Happening: Here Are the Best Meltdowns From MSNBC Prime Time
MSNBC again turned to Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, and Nicolle Wallace to lead their coverage from 6:45 p.m. to 11 p.m. Eastern and, quite simply, it was a rhetorical bloodbath with unhinged hatred about Republicans having “turned the suburbs” into a bastion of racist insurrectionists hellbent on opposing critical race theory in schools.
And despite numerous false claims by a litany of MSNBCers that Critical Race Theory wasn’t “not taught” in schools, their utterances didn’t change the fact that CRT does exist in schools.
Above are the worst MSNBC meltdowns between 8:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Eastern, presented in no particular order in a Notable Quotables-style format. To see the worst from when the trio took over at 6:45 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern, check out....
Terry McAuliffe Refuses to Concede Election as Glenn Youngkin Declared Winner
Virginia Democrat gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe said Tuesday night that he will not yet concede the election as major news outlets have called the election for Republican Glenn Youngkin.
Major news outlets have reported that political outsider Youngkin will defeat McAuliffe in the Virginia gubernatorial election, marking a drastic transformation for Republicans ahead of the pivotal 2022 midterm elections.
However, even though Youngkin is poised to win the election, McAuliffe said Virginia should count all of the votes before declaring a winner.
“So, we still got a lot of votes to count, we have about 18 percent of the vote out,” McAuliffe said.
He emphasized that “every single Virginian should have their vote counted.” McAuliffe wrote in a statement:
Folks, not everything is counted and we’re still waiting for a lot of votes to come in. And we want to ensure every Virginians’ voice is heard. To all my supporters across Virginia who knocked doors, made phone calls, and talked to their neighbors: I am eternally grateful.
“We know that the long-term path of Virginia is toward inclusion and openness and tolerance. We can and will never stop...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)