Monday, December 6, 2021
Unvaccinated Austrians Face Prison Time, Huge Fines For Non-Compliance
Booster jabs would also be mandatory.
Austrians who refuse to take a mandatory COVID-19 vaccine before a government imposed deadline face prison sentences and huge compounding fines for non-compliance.
After initially placing the unvaccinated under lockdown, a policy that completely failed, Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg announced that the jab would become compulsory from February 1.
Questions as to what would happen to those who still refused to take it have now been answered in the form of a draft that was leaked to the media.
“Under the bill, anyone who refused to attend a scheduled vaccination appointment would receive an official summons from local authorities. If an individual failed to show up, they would then be summoned one more time within the next four weeks,” reports RT.
“Should the second official request be ignored as well, the person would face a fine of €3,600 ($4,061) or four weeks in prison. The fine would increase to €7,200 ($8,000) for those who had already been fined twice for violating the vaccination requirement.”
No one will be “forcibly brought” to a vaccination center to get jabbed against their will, although rest assured, they will be “forcibly” placed behind bars if they continue to refuse.
If it passes, the legislation will stay in place for three years, with the government deciding if having recovered from COVID is a...
They're pickin' up the prisoners and puttin' 'em in a pen
But Not These Guys, These Guys Are The Useful Idiots Of The State.
They're pickin' up the prisoners and puttin' 'em in a pen
And all she wants to do is dance, dance
Rebels been rebels since I don't know when
And all she wants to do is dance
Molotov cocktail - the local drink
And all she wants to do is dance, dance
Mix em up right, in the kitchen sink
And all she wants to do is dance....
Crazy people walkin' round with blood in their eyes
And all she wants to do is dance, dance
‘Capitol Punishment’ Is the January 6 Film You Must See
Pre-dawn FBI raids were conducted by dozens of armed agents transported in tactical vehicles to terrorize January 6 protesters and their neighbors. Citizens were ratted on by their friends and colleagues. Families were bankrupted and traumatized by the Biden regime’s ongoing crusade to punish hundreds of Americans who protested his unlawful election. People are held behind bars and denied bail based on their political views as trials are delayed far into 2022. And then there was the near point-blank execution of Ashli Babbitt at the hands of a Capitol Police lieutenant, who still is praised as a hero by the media and lawmakers of both parties while facing no criminal consequences for his actions that day.
These are just a few of the alarming stories included in Nick Searcy’s exceptional documentary, “Capitol Punishment.” Searcy, an accomplished actor and film producer, traveled around the country for months talking to Americans ensnared in the Justice Department’s abusive and punitive investigation into the events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Interviews include Dr. Simone Gold, Michael Waller, Jack Posobiec, Lt. General Michael Flynn, Representative Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) and Aaron Babbitt, the widow of Ashli Babbitt.
According to the producers, access to the documentary is being suppressed by Big Tech overlords.
Trailer here: Capitol Punishment Official Trailer (imdb.com)
Purchase the film here: Capitol Punishment | Western Journal Movies
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being On An FBI False Flag Team....
The Unbearable Lightness Of Having A Kinkos:
The Unbearable Lightness Of Not Being....
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being A First World Marxist When Your Party Is In Control....
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being White...
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Democrat....
The Unbearable Lightness Of Becoming Venezuela...
The Unbearable Lightheadedness Of Being Joe Biden...
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Inappropriately Awkward...
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Tasered - An Anonymous Tale Of Discovery...
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Vegan
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Jerry Nadler
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Joe Biden...
The Unbearable Lightheadedness Of Being Joe Biden...
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Inappropriately Awkward...
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Tasered - An Anonymous Tale Of Discovery...
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Vegan
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Jerry Nadler
The Unbearable Lightness Of Being Joe Biden...
‘Peng Is Not Free’: How The Olympics’ Leaders Are Endangering Chinese Tennis Star Peng Shuai
At every development of international criticism, Peng Shuai has either magically appeared or someone has provided something claiming to be from her to counter such criticism.
The below open letter was written to the International Olympic Committee’s leaders and originally published here on Dec. 2. The emphasis in the letter is original. It is republished here in full.
Dear IOC, President Bach, Chair Terho,
With the NGO Safeguard Defenders, I have been paying very close attention to the worrying situation of Peng Shuai in the People’s Republic of China. Peng has been disappeared, at least temporarily, only to appear in a series of ever-stranger and rather obviously staged appearances. This practice is eerily similar to a recurrent CCP tactic of stage-managed (TV) appearances, where victims are paraded and forced to perform by the police, often in an effort to counter international criticism.
While you may not have been fully aware of this practice at the outset of Peng’s disappearance, the behaviour of the IOC has taken a serious turn for the worse following your December 2 press release on a second closed-door video-call with Peng.
Contrary to your latest statements, the actions of the IOC are directly putting Peng at greater risk. If this continued error is indeed due to ignorance, this open letter will at least be one step to remedy such lack of knowledge, information, and understanding.
The practice of stage-managed appearances is most often referred to as forced televised confessions, though recently PRC police will more often resort to posting such videos on their social media channels or have newspapers carry them on their websites. In every scenario, the purpose remains the same: to either attack the person her- or himself, or to counter international criticism.
Safeguard Defenders is without a doubt among the world’s premier authorities on the PRC’s practice of forced TV confessions and the system for disappearances often employed to “prepare” the victims for their “performance” (RSDL — Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location). We therefore feel it is our duty to address some of the issues related to Peng’s situation and the IOC’s actions. As I have personally been through both of these experiences — disappearance in RSDL and subsequently forced into a scripted, stage-managed, public appearance — strengthens me in my belief I should write you this letter.
Peng is not free. You know — or should know — that she is not free. You have seen the initial letter claiming to be from her — where she retracts the allegations of rape against former high-level CCP cadre and State leader Zhang Gaoli. If she is not under control by the police, why in the world would she do that? Her first “re-appearances” in a restaurant and claimed meetings with friends have been dissected and shown to be ludicrous at best.
At every development of international criticism, like clockwork, Peng has either magically appeared or someone has provided something claiming to be from her to counter such criticism.
As said, at the outset, doing the bidding of the Chinese State and Police might have been forgivable due to lack of awareness, as with your first publicized video call. However, the following and widespread criticism of your actions means there is simply no way that you are not aware of how wrong your actions were. Yet now you have engaged in...
Remember: Taking Out The Trash Is DAILY Chore....
The Earlier The Better Like At Sunrise:
Sunrise, new day, hear my song
I am tired of fightin' and foolin' around
But from now till who knows when
My sword will be my pen
And I'll love you, love ya
For all of my time.
Social-Emotional Learning: The Insidious Teaching Tool You’ve Never Heard Of
What is social-emotional learning?
By now, many Americans are aware of critical race theory, which makes race the focus of all aspects of American life. The philosophy categorizes individuals into groups of oppressors and victims, and is currently making its way through the political sphere, the military, and of course, education.
But less well known is its ideological cousin, social-emotional learning. The program seeks to indoctrinate kids into leftist ideology by reinforcing a series of critical race theory-based morals and values.
Jennifer McWilliams was working as a reading teacher at Frankton Elementary School in Indiana when she noticed that social-emotional learning was being taught as part of the curriculum at her school. When she voiced her concerns about the racist ideology, she was summarily fired.
McWilliams says there’s nothing good about social-emotional learning, and that it’s based in racist critical race theory.
“It is all negative,” she says, “When you understand the program fully, and you understand the framework and the ideology behind it, you will understand that it is not good. The entire social-emotional learning framework is based on the critical race theory ideology.”
Listen to the interview on “The Daily Signal Podcast” or read a lightly edited transcript below.
Doug Blair: Our guest today is Jennifer McWilliams, an Indiana teacher who was fired from her job after she criticized the use of social-emotional learning in her school’s curriculum, as well as the founder and CEO of Purple for Parents Indiana. Jennifer, welcome to the show.
Jennifer McWilliams: Thank you for having me. I’m excited to be here.
Blair: Excellent. Well, we are very excited to have you as well. Before we get into some of the story behind your firing, let’s start by defining our terms. What exactly is social-emotional learning?
McWilliams: Social-emotional learning, it is a teaching method that has for the past five, six years transformed the education and system. And it comes from CASEL, which is the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Basically, they sold it to the public education system as a way to teach children life skills that they are not receiving.
But through my two years of research and understanding of this program, it really is the key to what parents across this country are looking for right now. Social-emotional learning is the psychological manipulation of our children to adopt the critical race theory ideology.
Blair: You mentioned critical race theory, which is something that The...
Omicron Detected in 38 Countries, But Officials Says the New Variant Hasn't Claimed a Single Life
The Little Omicron That Couldn't
Despite the pronouncement that the omicron variant is a “deadly virus,” no one has yet died from it, according to the World Health Organization.
The WHO said Friday that the omicron variant has spread to 38 countries, but that to date no deaths had been attributed to the variant, despite what Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has claimed.
The WHO said that a full understanding of the variant’s lethality could still be weeks away, according to The Guardian.
“We’re going to get the answers that everybody out there needs,” WHO Emergencies Director Michael Ryan said.
Although the report of no deaths is good news, the WHO said it has the potential to cause more than half of Europe’s COVID cases this winter.
The variant could also impact the globe by...
DoJ Releases Memo Completely Exonerating Trump of Planning J6 & WOW
The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials, Reuters reports.
Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.
“Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. “Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”
They called groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys “cells” as if they were terrorists, but admit these groups had no plans of what to do inside the Capitol.
Reuters accused Donald Trump of making an “incendiary speech.” What is incendiary about telling protesters to march peacefully? His speech was a typical stump speech.
So read the following excerpt from the memo and ask yourself why the dimwit Stalinists on the J6 committee are wasting our tax dollars investigating J6:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)