90 Miles From Tyranny

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Fascist Antifa Brownshirts attack train passengers medically exempted from wearing masks

Black Is The New Brown: Antifa gangs in Germany have started checking compliance with the mask requirement on Berlin's public transport system and assaulting those not wearing a mask.

They are also said to have thrown off passengers without a mask from a train, even though they had a medical certificate that exempted them from the mask requirement.

Berliner Zeitung, a news outlet which belongs to the Springer Group, reported gleefully on this development.

Accordingly, the self-proclaimed “anti-fascists” made themselves felt with the slogan: “Antifa mask control!” When presented with the medical certificates of the affected passengers, they rejected these and instead assaulted them. The attackers told a journalist: “The certificates are probably not real. Now we have to do the job of the police.”

The train passengers were injured in the Antifa assault.

Around 650 police officers were on duty to monitor illegal demos and gatherings in the city.

A registered car parade against Corona measures was on the way through the city from Friedrichsfelde at lunchtime with 80 cars and more than 170 participants. Antifa thugs also attacked the motorcade. Eleven men and three women were...

Uh, hey Joe, I heard you shot your woman down,

you shot her down.

Uh, hey Joe, I heard you shot you old lady down,

you shot her down to the ground. Yeah!

Yes, I did, I shot her,

you know I caught her messin' 'round,

messin' 'round town.

Uh, yes I did, I shot her

you know I caught my old lady messin' 'round town.

And I gave her the gun and I shot her!

Elizabeth Warren Endorses Plan To Expand the Supreme Court

Senator says court packing is necessary to balance conservative justices

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) is backing legislation to expand the Supreme Court, accusing Republicans of hijacking the tribunal to subvert democracy.

Warren announced Tuesday that she will add her name to a court-packing bill that Democrats introduced in April. That legislation would add four seats to the High Court, bringing the total number of justices from 9 to 13.

The endorsement makes Warren the new frontman for court-packing, which has attracted support in Congress from a handful of low-profile lawmakers. Her support is a needed jolt to the expansion campaign, which gives every sign of sputtering out for the time being. President Joe Biden's Supreme Court commission refused to endorse Supreme Court expansion, and top Democratic lawmakers in both chambers are refusing to entertain the court-expansion bill.

Democrats offer shifting rationales for the legislation. House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler (D., N.Y.), who introduced the bill in July, described it as a benign management necessity. Each justice handles administrative matters for 1 or 2 of the 13 federal appeals courts. Nadler said four seats ought to be added to the Court so that there is one justice per appeals court, which would reduce the strain of those administrative responsibilities.

There is no evidence that the justices are struggling to keep pace with their work—the Court is hearing its lowest number of merits cases per term since the Civil War—and the various circuit courts do not produce Court-caliber cases at an equal rate.

Warren was more forthright about her motives in a short video released Tuesday morning. She connected the Supreme Court's conservative majority with a broader Republican scheme to cleave to power by using "broken rules" such as the filibuster and the Electoral College.

"Republicans steal power to ram through an extremist, unpopular agenda. Basic protections like Roe v. Wade, supported by 70 percent of Americans, are hanging by a thread," she said. "And that's just the tip of the iceberg."

Warren ticked off a litany of grievances with the Supreme Court, citing decisions that favor corporate political spending and a 2018 ruling that forbade public-sector unions from collecting mandatory dues.

Studies show that left-wing groups and Democratic campaigns significantly outpace Republicans on so-called dark-money spending. And in the aftermath of...

Now everybody
Have you heard
If you're in the game
Then the stroke's the word

Don't take no rhythm
Don't take no style
Got a thirst for killing
Grab your vial

United Nations Grantee Uses U.S. Tax Dollars To Fund Illegal Immigration

Monthly cash for food, lodging, and 'movement' assistance amounts to material support for illegal immigration. It influences decisions to cross.

AUSTIN, Texas – During a recent trip to a Reynosa, Mexico migrant camp, I took photos of a United Nations-supported International Organization for Migration (IOM) operation to hand out cash debit cards to intending and repeat border crossers.

One of two workers at a plastic folding table inside the Reynosa camp, which was filled to capacity with at least 1,200 mostly U.S.-expelled Central Americans, said they were distributing the cards for IOM to help migrants waiting until they cross the Rio Grande at greater leisure to claim asylum, for which most will be declared ineligible years later. Many parents, for instance, got about $400 every 15 days, I was told, or $800 a month if they were still there to collect it, although the support level varied.

My photos of this posted to Twitter and related dispatch for the Center for Immigration Studies drew outrage among some Republican lawmakers. They saw the images as evidence that the U.S. taxpayer-funded IOM was providing material support to an ongoing mass migration harmful to America’s national interest.

A couple of weeks later, Texas Rep. Lance Gooden, R-Texas, and 11 other House Republican co-sponsors introduced the “No Tax Dollars for the United Nations Immigration Invasion Act” bill. It would prohibit the $3.8 billion in contributions currently proposed in the White House 2022 budget to the IOM and other UN-supported organizations. A Daily Caller story that broke news of the bill’s introduction quoted Gooden citing my Reynosa photos.

When I took the photos, I wasn’t exactly sure of exactly what I was seeing in Reynosa. But here’s what I have learned since: The money card is confirmed beyond doubt, but also “hard cash in envelopes” and “movement assistance”; and an online IOM “Emergency Manual” describes what I saw as part of a program it terms “Cash-Based Interventions,” or...

Bow down before the one you serve
You're going to get what you deserve
Bow down before the one you serve
You're going to get what you deserve

God money's not looking for the cure
God money's not concerned about the sick among the pure
God money, let's go dancing on the backs of the bruised
God money's not one to choose

Texas prison study shows zero benefit for vaccinated

A large team of researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Department of Justice found in a study in a Texas prison that vaccinated inmates were infectious for exactly as long and as seriously as unvaccinated inmates.

This study can hardly be more official. The researchers were not critics of vaccination either.

They studied a Corona outbreak in a prison in Texas in July 2021. In the following weeks, regular smears and tests were taken from a selected group of inmates. The result: There is no difference whatsoever between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated inmates.

No statistically significant difference was detected in the duration of viral culture positivity between participants who were fully vaccinated (median: 5 days) compared with those who were not fully vaccinated.

Not a single one of the infected prisoners died of Covid-19, although over 70 percent were overweight or obese, according to the study. One vaccinated and one unvaccinated were hospitalized. The most common symptoms were a runny nose, impaired sense of taste and cough. Since a prison is a confined space, the results are very revealing for hospitals, nursing homes, office complexes and enclosed spaces in general.

As this study shows, every vaccinated nurse or doctor is infectious for as long and just as severely as an unvaccinated doctor or nurse. This gene therapy does not bring about clinical or sterile immunity.

They warned health practitioners to “consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons. These findings are critically important, especially in congregate settings where...

A Call for Eye Specialists to Routinely Examine Eyes Of “Vaccinated” People to Check for Eye Strokes and Thromboses

Hosted by UK Column, last Friday Doctors for Covid Ethics (“D4CE”) held their second symposium, “Sounding the Call.” The symposium comprised 15 experts in science, medicine, finance, media, and the law who spoke as they should – freely and honestly.

Dr. Carsten Stümke is a German ophthalmologist who has been practising medicine for 25 years. He specialised in ophthalmology after having taken an in interest in the subject during an academic internship in Prague as early as 1993. Dr. Stümke combines modern academic medicine with holistic approaches of taking into account the needs of each individual patient as a human being. Special emphasis is given to nutritional medicinal consulting for patients.

In his presentation, Dr. Stümke discussed four cases of small vessel disease of the retina and the optic nerve found in patients who were attending routine eye examinations. None of the patients indicated to Dr. Stümke they had experienced any problems with their vision. All four patients had received either two or three doses of Covid injections.

Dr. Stümke used three techniques to examine patients’ eyes: ophthalmoscopy, field of vision and optical coherence tomography (“OCT”).

Ophthalmoscopy or retinal examination is a test that allows an ophthalmologist, or eye doctor, to look at the back of the eye. It can be used to screen for eye diseases and conditions that can affect blood vessels.

OCT is a non-invasive medical imaging technique, using light waves, to produce images of the back of an eye (the retina). Many conditions form at the very back of the eye, and OCT allows identification of changes in, for example: the vitreous (the jelly-like substance that fills the eye); retina (the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye); macula (an area at the centre of the retina responsible for central vision); and, the optic nerve (transmits light impulses to the brain to produce the images we see).

The first case that Dr. Stümke presented was a patient who had three Covid injections: two doses of Moderna and one dose of Pfizer-BioNTech. He observed an arterial disturbance of the optic nerve and a thinning of the retina.

In the second case the patient had been given three Pfizer-BioNTech injections. Dr. Stümke observed this patient had micro-thrombosis near the fovea. The fovea is a tiny part of the eye’s anatomy that makes a huge difference in eyesight. Resting inside the macula, the fovea provides our absolute sharpest vision.

The third and fourth patients both had two Pfizer-BioNTech injections. Dr. Stümke observed these patients had vein occlusions and swelling of the retina. Occlusions, or eye strokes, are when blockages occur in arteries or veins in the retina, causing vision loss.

Dr. Stümke concluded that all four patients had high blood pressure, diabetes or high cholesterol. Patients with these diagnoses have higher risk of vascular disease in the eye and venous thrombosis in big or small vessels.

Considering the age of the patients it is possible these findings were not related to the Covid injections however, “we know that Covid vaccination also can cause vascular disease – like venous thrombosis of the vessels in the brain or gastrointestinal tract – and also stokes and heart attacks,” he said, “None of these patients complained of any symptoms … but the abnormal findings in the eye are clearly visible … this is remarkable.” Dr. Stümke on average only sees these diagnoses once a year but “these four clinical cases … all appeared within a time period of only five weeks!”

Dr. Stümke appealed to all ophthalmologists to look for...

In a press conference on Dec. 10, DeSantis announced new rules affecting daycare facilities around the state that would prohibit the issuance or renewal of any license to facilities that house unaccompanied alien minors for resettlement in Florida without a cooperative agreement between state and federal governments. DeSantis proposed this action in response to the Biden administration’s practice of paying daycare providers $500 to $1,400 per day to care for illegal immigrant children who arrived unaccompanied to the United States.

The revised language in the DCF Emergency rule enacts a directive that DeSantis laid out in an Executive Order from Sept. 28, 2021, designed to protect Floridians from the dangerous impacts of the Biden border crisis.

Under the new emergency rule, the federal government’s resettlement of illegal aliens (unaccompanied minors) from outside Florida does not constitute evidence of need as required for issuance or renewal of a state license for a child-care facility. This means that no licenses will be issued or renewed with respect to any child-care agency that provides services to illegal aliens transported to Florida from outside the state.

The press secretary for Governor DeSantis, Christina Pushaw, told PJ Media in an email:

The Biden Administration is incentivizing our state-licensed childcare facilities to provide for unaccompanied minors – instead of providing care for Florida kids in need. The federal government pays $500-$1400 per bed, per day to operators who take unaccompanied minors. The state simply cannot compete with this rate; Florida uses a more cost-effective method to determine rates for group home providers. The state’s payment is also tied directly to benefit the child, so providers are only paid when services are provided (whereas the federal government pays the same rate per bed, whether or not all those beds are being used). Florida’s average daily rate is $158 for each child served.

Pushaw called the federal government’s payment structure and less restrictive standards “unnecessary and unfair competition” that harms the children of Florida.

“Diverting resources away from kids in need in Florida,” Pushaw said, “to illegal aliens being smuggled here by the Biden Administration for clandestine resettlement does not serve the people of our state.”

DeSantis made the remarks at a press conference with a wider emphasis on what Florida can do to fight back against Biden’s border crisis and legislative proposals he’s made for...