Monday, February 14, 2022
Overwhelming majority of Dems want Hillary Clinton investigated for Russiagate scandal, now
The Democrat Bench is Looking So Weak, They May Need To Get Dukakis To Ride In A Tank Again...
According to a survey conducted by TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics in New Jersey, an overwhelming majority of Democrats want Hillary Clinton investigated over her alleged role in the Russiagate scandal along with her top campaign advisers.
The New York Post is reporting that the survey polled 1,308 Americans in January concerning the investigation by Special Counsel John Durham into Clinton’s alleged efforts to manufacture dirt against former President Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Nearly three out of four of those polled on the explosive investigation believe it is important that prosecutors look into Clinton’s actions in connection to Russiagate. That includes 66 percent of Democrats who have been following the investigation. That number is up 20 points from last October which is very bad news for Clinton’s aspirations of running for the presidency again.
Ninety-one percent of Republicans and 65 percent of Independents also want Clinton to be investigated in the matter.
The Durham investigation has been an extremely slow crawl towards justice but he did charge Clinton campaign subcontractor Igor Danchenko for allegedly lying about the sourcing behind the debunked Steele dossier he helped compile against the former president. The document was reportedly a brazen attempt to frame Trump as a Kremlin agent.
The indictment against Danchenko states that the former Brookings Institution analyst completely fabricated the source for the dossier’s most explosive allegations. It was also revealed that...
Working Age Deaths Are Up 40% in America and Nobody’s Allowed To Ask Why
Pfizer has dropped an application for emergency-use authorization of its Covid-19 vaccine in India, after refusing to cooperate with the regulator’s demands for local safety trials.
The decision by Pfizer means their vaccine will not be available for sale in the world’s two most populous countries, India and China, in the near future.
Unlike other companies conducting studies in India for foreign-developed vaccines, Pfizer had sought an exemption citing approvals it had received elsewhere including the United States. When the regulator insisted on a local safety trial, Pfizer pulled the pin.
The news days after Moderna’s CEO was caught dumping hundreds of millions of dollars of Moderna stock and deleting his Twitter account. Another senior Moderna executive also dumped a huge amount of stock in the Big Pharma Company.
Pfizer also admitted last week that a safety audit could wipe billions off their stock market valuation.
Reuters report: The U.S. company, which was the first drugmaker to seek emergency approval in India for its vaccine developed with Germany’s BioNTech, made the withdrawal decision after a meeting with India’s Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) on Wednesday.
The drug regulator said on its website its experts did not recommend the vaccine because of side effects reported abroad were still being investigated. It also said Pfizer had not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in India.
“Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time,” Pfizer said in a statement.
“Pfizer will continue to engage with...
Visage à trois #41
La petite mort bonus video:
Videos That Are:
- Usually Short.
- Usually Timely.
- Usually Scraped, Gleaned And Pilfered From Social Media.
Visage à trois #37
Visage à trois #40
La petite mort bonus video:
Videos That Are:
- Usually Short.
- Usually Timely.
- Usually Scraped, Gleaned And Pilfered From Social Media.
Visage à trois #37
Will the 'Unvaxxed' Have the Last Laugh?
For over a year now, the messaging from our “health experts” and government leaders has been as dreary as it has been monotonal: Take the covid “vaccine” or die.
That talking point was reiterated by President Biden* just a few weeks ago when he warned the “unvaxxed” would face “a winter of severe disease and death.” And that was before New Jersey’s resident rodent meteorologist, Milltown Mel, shuffled off this mortal coil just prior to Groundhog Day. So I guess that means, in New Jersey at least, another six weeks of severe disease and death.
Originally, of course, we were told the mRNA injections would prevent people from contracting the disease. “If you get vaccinated, you won’t get covid” was the mantra recited for months, in various forms and multiple forums, by Drs. Fauci, Walensky, and Murthy, President Biden*, and many others. We were also assured that sufficiently jabbed people don’t spread the virus, with Fauci claiming the injections constitute a “dead end for covid.”
It's important not to forget those statements, as the same people now insist they never promised any such thing. Perhaps that’s because, in the face of overwhelming evidence, they’ve been forced to admit jabbed people can and do get covid and can and do give it to others. Said Walensky just a few weeks ago, “what [the vaccines] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.” Even Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was forced to acknowledge that his products now offer “limited, in any, protection.”
But what about the vaunted “death benefit” from the mRNA injections? They still protect against serious illness and death, right? Well, yes, that does seem to be the case—but the effect is waning fast. Moreover, the claim itself comes with several asterisks.
There have always been questions about how we count “covid deaths,” as both the CDC and the UK’s National Health Service have recently acknowledged. But if anything, those problems have been amplified in the way we differentiate between “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” deaths.
For one thing, the most commonly cited number to prove “vaccine efficacy”—“90 percent of covid deaths are among the unvaccinated”—is fundamentally flawed because it goes back to the earliest days of the injections when almost no one had gotten them. Obviously, nearly all who died of (or with) covid in January and February of 2021 were “unvaccinated.”
Moreover, our health officials have been engaged for over a year in a kind of statistical sleight of hand, categorizing people who have taken the injections as “unvaccinated” up until 14 days after their second shot, which means at least five or six weeks have passed since their first shot. In doing so, they ignore evidence that the shots actually make people more susceptible to the virus in the short term. So if you contract covid after getting both shots, but prior to the closing of the 14-day window, and then die, you are considered an “unvaccinated” death. (They’re playing this same trick with the booster shots, too.)
This method also does not account for those who die as a result of immediate adverse reactions to the shots. Such deaths are generally numbered among the “unvaccinated,” even though it was the “vaccine” that killed them. But that’s a topic for another day.
Another fact the Covidians like to conveniently gloss over is that most people who die from covid, still, are elderly and/or infirm. In many cases, they’re already at death’s door, too sick even to be injected, which for them would simply hasten the inevitable with no appreciable benefit. Yet when they do die, they’re chalked up as “unvaccinated.” That clearly skews the numbers.
Unfortunately for the vaccinators, the “death benefit” narrative is beginning to erode, much like the “you won’t get covid” narrative before it. The latest statistics out of the UK (whose numbers are more accurate and honest than ours, although still not completely transparent), as broken down by Igor Chudov on Substack, show protection against death waning in all age groups, week over week, by an average of seven percent. Worst is the 40-49 age group, which just saw a 12 percent decline.
In addition, the director of the coronavirus ward at Israel’s Ichilov Hospital, Prof. Jacob Giris, reports that at his institution, “between 70 and 80 percent of…severe cases are vaccinated” and boosted, with “at least three injections.” He goes on to conclude, in an interview with a local news channel, that “the vaccine has no significance regarding severe illness.”
And then there’s this: a new study out of The Netherlands claims to have determined the reason for the apparent “death benefit”—and it’s not good news. As you may recall, way back at the beginning of the pandemic, we were told it's often not the coronavirus itself that kills but rather the immune system’s extreme overreaction to the virus—the “cytokine storm.” Remember that?
Well, the Dutch researchers think they know why the injections seem to prevent some deaths: because they impede the immune system’s response to the point where such extreme reactions are less likely. From the study: “We observed a significant reduction in...
The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #929
Before You Click On The "Read More" Link,
Please Only Do So If You Are Over 21 Years Old.
If You are Easily Upset, Triggered Or Offended, This Is Not The Place For You.
Please Leave Silently Into The Night......
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #1629
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)