Tuesday, March 8, 2022
Florida Department of Health Officially Recommends AGAINST COVID-19 Vaccines For Healthy Children
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced on Monday that the Florida Department of Health will become the first state agency to officially recommend against COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children.
Monday morning, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Ladapo hosted a roundtable discussion in West Palm Beach to discuss the “”the Curtain Close on COVID Theater.”
“Lockdown politicians and the medical establishment have continually ignored data, instead choosing to stoke fear and push for lockdowns and mask mandates in their fruitless attempts to ‘stop the spread,’” the governor’s office stated in a news release ahead of the discussion. “Governor DeSantis will highlight the efforts his administration has taken on behalf of Floridians over the past year.”
Ladapo said the medical establishment figures behind the disastrous mask, lockdown, and mandate policies should not be given a free pass for being wrong about everything.
“One thing that’s very important at this point is to not let these people get away with it,” he said.
The governor and surgeon general were joined by numerous physicians, virologists and epidemiologists to discuss how the regime’s failed COVID policies affected Americans, particularly children.
Doctors who participated in the roundtable included Dr. Robert Malone, an American physician and biochemist; Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor of Epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine; Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research; Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician and epidemiologist at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital; and Dr. Sunetra Gupta, an Indian-born British infectious disease epidemiologist and a professor of theoretical epidemiology at the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford.
Gupta, Kulldorff, and Bhattacharya are the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, a statement published in October of 2020 that advocated an alternative approach to the COVID-19 pandemic which to avoid the societal harm of COVID-19 lockdowns and mandates. Nearly 16,000 medical and public health scientists signed the declaration, and nearly 47,000 medical practitioners signed on.
“Almost from the beginning of the pandemic, we adopted policies that seemed like they were tailor made to harm children,” Bhattacharya said. “Throughout the country, schools closed in the early days, and in many places schools stayed closed.” Bhattacharya said the effect of school closures on children has been catastrophic.
During the discussion, DeSantis asked Malone for his take on why the government was so hostile to early treatment COVID options like repurposed drugs and monoclonal antibodies.
“You never heard Fauci talking about that at all. We started using it [monoclonal antibodies] in Florida and were criticized for it,” the governor noted. “It was almost like—lockdown, mask until there’s a vaccine, and there was a hostility to even discussing the idea of...
Why the Washington Post Cannot 'Correct' Its Trayvon Tribute
Before listing the problems, let me establish my credentials to comment. I attended George Zimmerman's trial and wrote a book on the subject: If I Had a Son: Race, Guns, and the Railroading of George Zimmerman. I have since gotten to know George and his family well. In 2019, I edited Joel Gilbert's brilliantly researched book (and film), The Trayvon Hoax. I have a Ph.D. in American studies from Purdue.
Now for the problems:
Charles Blow tells us, “The contemporary civil rights movement unfolded directly in response to the murder of Trayvon Martin.” George Zimmerman was rightfully acquitted of murder. To launch a civil rights movement on a lie is a bad way to start one.
Barack Obama expressed his outrage at “the idea that this teenager who was walking down the street could be considered so threatening that a private citizen could initiate a confrontation resulting in that teenager’s death.”
Well, Trayvon wasn’t walking down the street. He was lurking in the shadows on a rainy night in a housing development plagued with break-ins and home invasions by young black men, and Zimmerman did not initiate the confrontation.
In the Post video, we hear George Zimmerman’s edited call to the dispatcher. What follows is the actual exchange:
Happy 308 Day!
I'll tell you a little something that my daddy told to me.
My basic fundamentals if you want to be free.
'cause son, there's something wrong internally.
So, if you want your freedom son.
Don't want your country to be overrun.
You got to keep America number one.
My daddy told me "son, don't let 'em take your gun.
That's what they tryin' to do.
Son, don't let 'em take your gun.
They're takin' your bill of rights away from you."
My daddy said "son, don't let 'em take your gun.
That's what they tryin' to do.
Son, don't let 'em take your gun.
Don't let 'em take your gun away from you."
Group Biden Removed from the Terror List Hopes That, Allah Willing, Its Missiles Will Soon Reach NY
The frightening fantasies of Biden's foreign policy.
The Houthis, the Iran-backed Shi’a jihad group in Yemen, recently held a student rally in the Yemeni city of Hajjah, but they weren’t exactly cheering on their favorite soccer team. The rally, which was televised on the Houthi network Al-Masirah TV, featured a student proclaiming, “Placing their trust in Allah, our missile forces are continuing to strike deep inside Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Allah willing, our UAVs will reach Tel Aviv and New York in the very near future.” A UAV is an unmanned aerial vehicle, that is, a drone. No one in New York needs to worry about Houthi drones anytime soon, but the statement in itself once again revealed that Biden’s handlers’ foreign policy is based on fantasy and wishful thinking, not any rational assessment of reality.
This is because in February 2021, just weeks after Old Joe Biden began his pretend-to-be-the-president act, the administration removed the Houthis from the list of terrorist groups. An unnamed State Department wonk explained, “Our action is due entirely to the humanitarian consequences of this last-minute designation from the prior administration, which the United Nations and humanitarian organizations have since made clear would accelerate the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.”
The Houthis were only designated a terror group for a few weeks, so this humanitarian crisis could not possibly have been very severe. Donald Trump’s administration added the Houthis to the terror list in January 2021, not long before Trump left office. As was always the case with anything and everything that Trump did, the Leftist political and media establishment was outraged. No fewer than twenty-two aid groups that were operating in Yemen demanded that the designation be revoked “immediately.” Old Joe obliged when he began his president act, but now, Trump has been proven right yet again. If any group deserves to be considered foreign terrorists, it’s the Houthis.
The student’s hope that Houthi drones would one day bomb New York didn’t come out of thin air. In November 2021, the Yemeni media outlet Al-Masdar Online reported that Houthis stormed our embassy (closed since 2015) in Yemen’s nominal capital, Sana’a, seizing “large quantities of equipment and materials.” Just days before that, according to...
Gas Prices Are Now Even Higher Than A Modern Classic Apocalypse Movie Predicted
Trump accurately predicted $7 gas if Biden was elected
Gas prices have surged to all time highs and are now even more expensive than a fairly recent movie predicted they would be during the APOCOLPYSE.
Prices in areas of California have surpassed $7 per gallon, as the national U.S. average price surged beyond $4 per gallon on Sunday.
It certainly doesn’t bode well for what is to come.
All of this was entirely predictable of course.
During a 2020 rally, President Trump warned that gas prices would surge to $7 if Biden was elected:
Tech Trojan Horse: How the Senate is Poised to Codify Censorship of Social Media
Beware of politicians bearing reforms. Since the Trojans first wheeled a wooden horse into their fortified city, many are leery about “gifts” that may be heavily laden with dangers. That is true with the Trojan horse legislation just offered by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.). In the name of “reforming” the internet and bringing tech monopolies to heel, Klobuchar has penned a “Nudge Act” that would expand corporate censorship and speech controls.
Even the name is designed to be non-threatening. After all, who could oppose an act titled “Nudging Users to Drive Good Experiences on Social Media”? It is enough to garner the support of Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.). The act, however, is less of a nudge and more of a shove toward approved content and choices.
For years, President Joe Biden and Democratic members of Congress have pushed for greater and greater censorship on the internet and on social media. Liberals have found a winning strategy in using corporate censorship to circumvent constitutional limits on governmental speech controls. Senators like Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) warned social media companies that they would not tolerate any “backsliding or retrenching” by “failing to take action against dangerous disinformation,” and demanded “robust content modification” to block disfavored views on subjects ranging from climate control to elections to the pandemic.
The Nudge Act is arguably the most insidious of these efforts. Under the Act, Congress would enlist the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) to recommend sweeping design changes to Big Tech platforms like Facebook, Instagram and YouTube to “reduce the harms of algorithmic amplification and social media addiction.”
The Act is a masterpiece of doublespeak. It refers to developing “content-agnostic interventions” that could ultimately be enforced by a commission and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). That sounds great; after all, many of us have called for years for a return to content neutrality on social media where sites function more as communication platforms, similar to telephone companies. However, that is clearly not the intent of the bill’s sponsors, who see it as a weapon against...
Even the name is designed to be non-threatening. After all, who could oppose an act titled “Nudging Users to Drive Good Experiences on Social Media”? It is enough to garner the support of Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.). The act, however, is less of a nudge and more of a shove toward approved content and choices.
For years, President Joe Biden and Democratic members of Congress have pushed for greater and greater censorship on the internet and on social media. Liberals have found a winning strategy in using corporate censorship to circumvent constitutional limits on governmental speech controls. Senators like Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) warned social media companies that they would not tolerate any “backsliding or retrenching” by “failing to take action against dangerous disinformation,” and demanded “robust content modification” to block disfavored views on subjects ranging from climate control to elections to the pandemic.
The Nudge Act is arguably the most insidious of these efforts. Under the Act, Congress would enlist the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) to recommend sweeping design changes to Big Tech platforms like Facebook, Instagram and YouTube to “reduce the harms of algorithmic amplification and social media addiction.”
The Act is a masterpiece of doublespeak. It refers to developing “content-agnostic interventions” that could ultimately be enforced by a commission and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). That sounds great; after all, many of us have called for years for a return to content neutrality on social media where sites function more as communication platforms, similar to telephone companies. However, that is clearly not the intent of the bill’s sponsors, who see it as a weapon against...
Russian CDS Hit Record 2,757bps After Morgan Stanley Says Russia Set For Venezuela-Style Default...
Bondholders said they received cash to pay off the bonds Monday, according to the people with knowledge of the payments, who declined to be identified because they aren’t authorized to speak publicly about the matter.News of the coupon payment sent the price of the bond sharply higher after crashing to 50% of par last week and was repaid at par today.
“We see a default as the most likely scenario,” Simon Waever, the firm’s global co-head of emerging-market sovereign credit strategy, wrote in a Monday note. “In case of default, it is unlikely to be like a normal one, with Venezuela instead perhaps the most relevant comparison.”
Waever believes that the default may come as soon as April 15, which will mark the end of a 30-day grace period on coupon payments the Russian government owes on dollar bonds due in 2023 and 2043.
According to Bloomberg, Russian bonds due 2023 are trading at around 29 cents on the U.S. dollar, though there appears to have been no trades at those levels. In the days before Russia invaded Ukraine last month, both bonds were trading above par.
While it is rare for sovereign debt to tumble to the single digits, Morgan Stanley said Russia’s bonds “could get close.” Lebanon and Venezuela are the only recent examples of a country’s debt slipping so low.
“The potential for significant further selling will put additional downside pressure on...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)