Ninety miles from the South Eastern tip of the United States, Liberty has no stead. In order for Liberty to exist and thrive, Tyranny must be identified, recognized, confronted and extinguished.
infinite scrolling
Monday, August 22, 2022
Diversityland
It continues to be a “strength” in London.
6 murders in 4 days in London.
Riots and looting.
Sadiq Khan blames…
The school holidays and the weather.
In reality, he should blame himself...
The 90 Miles Mystery Video: Nyctophilia Edition #1118
The 90 Miles Mystery Box: Episode #1818
You have come across a mystery box. But what is inside?
It could be literally anything from the serene to the horrific,
from the beautiful to the repugnant,
from the mysterious to the familiar.
If you decide to open it, you could be disappointed,
you could be inspired, you could be appalled.
This is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended.
You have been warned.
Sunday, August 21, 2022
Horrifying Thai study finds evidence of heart damage in 2.33% of vaccinated school-aged participants...
I’m late to this disturbing study of 301 Thai adolescents aged 13 to 18, who were monitored for cardiac symptoms following Dose 2 of Pfizer. Nearly a third reported effects of some kind, and 2.33% of the participants (3.5% of the males) exhibited biomarkers indicating damaged heart muscle. The rates are substantially higher than those found in prior studies, probably because “the study protocol … required determining baseline troponin-T, CK-MB, ECG and echocardiography before vaccination” (p. 11). In other words, the authors established individual baselines for each patient to better detect subtler anomalies.
Those are terrible, terrible numbers – orders of magnitude above what we’d expect in this demographic, which faces essentially no risk from Corona infection. It’s probably for this reason that the authors are especially eager to lard their analysis with the familiar excuses:
[T]he incidence of COVID-19-associated cardiac injury or myocarditis is … estimated to be 100 times higher than mRNA COVID-19-related myocarditis. Moreover, mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis is characterized by overall mild presentation and favorable outcomes … Overall, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination has an extremely favorable outcome and should be recommended for all adolescents. (p. 12)
I doubt that anyone (still less the authors) could believe this facile nonsense. Given the vastly higher rate of cardiac side-effects from vaccination their study detected, wouldn’t it be more reasonable to assume that rates of “COVID-19-related myocarditis” merely appear higher due to reporting bias? Is it in any sense appropriate to characterise myocarditis, with the potentially permanent damage to the heart that it entails, as “mild” and likely to end in “favourable outcome”? And how can anyone compare the risk from vaccination and from infection as if the two were alternatives? Finally, given that SARS-2 poses statistically zero risk to healthy adolescents aged 13 to 18, what could it mean to write of the vaccines having...
Those are terrible, terrible numbers – orders of magnitude above what we’d expect in this demographic, which faces essentially no risk from Corona infection. It’s probably for this reason that the authors are especially eager to lard their analysis with the familiar excuses:
[T]he incidence of COVID-19-associated cardiac injury or myocarditis is … estimated to be 100 times higher than mRNA COVID-19-related myocarditis. Moreover, mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis is characterized by overall mild presentation and favorable outcomes … Overall, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination has an extremely favorable outcome and should be recommended for all adolescents. (p. 12)
I doubt that anyone (still less the authors) could believe this facile nonsense. Given the vastly higher rate of cardiac side-effects from vaccination their study detected, wouldn’t it be more reasonable to assume that rates of “COVID-19-related myocarditis” merely appear higher due to reporting bias? Is it in any sense appropriate to characterise myocarditis, with the potentially permanent damage to the heart that it entails, as “mild” and likely to end in “favourable outcome”? And how can anyone compare the risk from vaccination and from infection as if the two were alternatives? Finally, given that SARS-2 poses statistically zero risk to healthy adolescents aged 13 to 18, what could it mean to write of the vaccines having...
The CDC isn't finding any vax deaths because they aren't looking for them
Are you surprised?
Executive summary
I'll explain how people will see nothing when they are punished if they see anything. This goes for the CDC, FDA, doctors, the medical community, medical examiners, etc. It's a corrupt system with a positive feedback loop that exacerbates the problem. When the doctors are silenced, the people and the media believe everything is fine. Which makes it easier for more doctors to believe the narrative. The media can justify their bias to only report one side of the narrative because it look like the vaccine is working exactly as advertised.
But the root of the problem is the CDC.
They haven’t found any deaths because they have not told any medical examiners and pathologists how to spot a vaccine-related death.
They know that to make an association with a death and the vaccine, specialized stains and procedures are required. They will not even request anyone to do this, and they will not ask for this staining to be done for any of the autopsy reports they have received. They could easily do this to find out the truth. They don’t do it because they don’t want to know and nobody in Congress is ever going to hold them accountable as long as the Democrats are in control.
It’s not like the protocols aren’t available. I document a very accurate protocol here. If the CDC doesn’t like it, then they should promote a protocol that finds even more association than that one.
So why haven’t they done this?
Because they are rewarded based on the # of shots delivered, not the # of lives saved.
How do I know that?
I talked to someone who used to work there.
Why the CDC hasn’t found any deaths due the vaccine
The news media can “justify” their bias by claiming that the CDC hasn’t found anyone who died from the vaccine.
But I was able to do this very easily. Check out this video of an obvious death caused by the vaccine (it was verified by multiple doctors who reviewed the records). The video has details of how the hospital and medical examiner cover it up.
and I know why they haven’t found anything: it’s because they aren’t looking. See this article.
The protocols the CDC should be recommending to medical examiners and pathologists
Anyone who dies within 30 days of a COVID vaccine should be checked to see if the vaccine caused the injury. Why would we not demand that this be done?
Simple! They don’t want to know.
Why the CDC hasn’t found a connection between vaccine injuries and the vaccine
Again, because nobody is looking
We are responding on behalf of Dr. Avi Nath, the NINDS Senior Investigator for the NINDS Section of Infections of the Nervous System, who has received your communications expressing concerns about injuries and side effects of vaccines. The mission of NINDS is to...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)